Link to USGS home page

Table 2. Differences in water-level elevations and hydraulic potential for vertical ground-water flow in monitoring-well clusters

[--, water level not recovered from well installation; NC, not calculated; NA, not applicable because difference was not calculated because one well is discharging a mixture of gas and water]

Site number (fig. 8)

Geologic unit

Hydrogeologic unit

Water-level elevation

Difference in water-level elevations

Hydraulic potential for vertical ground-water flow

W1 Wasatch Formation Wasatch aquifer 4,484.1 45 Downward
C7 Wyodak-Anderson coal bed of the Fort Union Formation Coalbed aquifer 4,439.1
 
W2 Wasatch Formation Wasatch aquifer 4,479.8 47.4 Downward
C9 Wyodak-Anderson coal bed of the Fort Union Formation Coalbed aquifer 4,432.4
 
W6 Wasatch Formation Wasatch aquifer -- NC Cannot evaluate because water level not recovered from installation of well W6 prior to measurement
C14 Wyodak-Anderson coal bed of the Fort Union Formation Coalbed aquifer 4,433.6
 
W7 Wasatch Formation Wasatch aquifer 4,483.7 37.6 Downward
C16 Wyodak-Anderson coal bed of the Fort Union Formation Coalbed aquifer 4,446.1
 
W8 Tongue River Member of the Fort Union Formation Wasatch aquifer 4,024.0 NA Upward
C17 Wyodak-Anderson coal bed of the Fort Union Formation Coalbed aquifer Flowing
 
W5 Wasatch Formation Wasatch aquifer 4,552.5 18.5 Downward
W4 Wasatch Formation Wasatch aquifer 4,534.0
W3 Wasatch Formation Wasatch aquifer 4,479.4 54.6

Go Back Arrow Go Back Go home Arrow Return to Index