Reply to Comment
by Neil Mitchell on
"Fe-Mn Nodule Field Indicated by GLORIA, North of the Puerto Rico
Trench"
Douglas G. Masson, IOS, Wormley, U.K. GU8 5UB
Kathryn M. Scanlon, USGS, Woods Hole, MA, U.S.A. 02543
modified from GeoMarine Letters, 1993.
v.13, p. 244-247.
The quantitative data presented by Mitchell confirm that sidescan
sonars operating at frequencies as low as 4.5 kHz should be able to detect fields of
iron-manganese (Fe-Mn) nodules, and are clear support for our original qualitative
interpretation. We stress that our original paper (Scanlon and Masson,
1992) was entirely qualitative. No claims were made for the efficiency of GLORIA in
assessing nodule abundance within a particular nodule field; indeed, a specific conclusion
was that higher resolution sonar, photography and sampling might all be required to fully
assess a field's economic value. We disagree with the statement that GLORIA is
"potentially unreliable for mapping Fe-Mn nodule fields" as suggested by
Mitchell. At all frequencies analysed by Weydert (1990), all nodule
abundances between 20 and 80% show a backscatter level significantly above that of the
background sediments (see Mitchell"s figure 1). This would generate a recognisable
signal on a sonar record, and thus the sonar would be capable of mapping the field. We
accept that, at low frequency, it may be difficult to relate backscatter character to
nodule abundance within a field, but this will not prevent mapping of the limits of the
field.
To allow comparison of our data with that of Mitchell, we have
calculated the acoustic contrast between the interpreted nodule field and the surrounding
area of sediment covered seafloor north of the Puerto Rico Trench. Relative backscatter
was calculated, from the unprocessed sonar data, along sections parallel to the sonar
vehicle track, to eliminate range dependent backscatter variation and system generated
artifacts. Appropriate corrections were made for the non-linear signal compression in the
recording signal. The increase in acoustic backscatter over our nodule field, relative to
sedimented seafloor, is +11 dB in the near and medium range of the sonar field at the
GLORIA frequency of 6.5 kHz (Fig. 1). An even greater contrast occurs
in the far range, because, at very low grazing angles, the backscatter from sediments
decreases much more dramatically than that from nodules.
Estimates of nodule coverage from seabed photographs (5-25%) exist for
only a few sites within the area we interpret as a Fe-Mn nodule field. If the estimate is
typical of the whole field, then our measured value of +11 dB for the backscatter contrast
between sediments and nodules is considerably higher than the value of about +5 dB
predicted by Mitchell's calculations for this degree of nodule coverage. The observed
contrast could be explained, as a problem of our interpretation, if some geological factor
other than Fe-Mn nodules were contributing to the overall backscatter signal within the
nodule field. This was discussed in our original paper, and was considered unlikely. Areas
of higher nodule coverage could also exist, but the remarkably uniform backscatter of the
whole nodule field argues against this.
An alternative explanation is that the real seabed geology may not
precisely fit the theory. Both Weydert (1990) and Mitchell note the
anomalous backscatter data obtained at 9 kHz in Weydert's original experiment. Such
anomalous backscatter could also occur at 6.5 kHz. In addition, Mitchell assumes that the
nodules can be considered as individual spheres, building on Weydert (1990) who noted
that, in his study area, nodule distribution on the seabed was not random and that nodules
were usually separated from one another by at least one nodule diameter. In contrast, the
seabed photograph in our original paper shows groups of closely packed or even touching
nodules, separated by areas of relatively clear seafloor (Scanlon and Masson, 1992, their
figure 4). In this situation, the relatively large nodule groups may act as large spheres,
thereby generating a stronger backscatter signal than individual nodules. This is,
indirectly, predicted by Mitchell's calculations, leading him to suggest that GLORIA is
most suited for mapping large nodules.
In summary, we believe that GLORIA is capable of mapping the extent of
Fe-Mn nodule fields, but would repeat our original contention that higher frequency sonar
surveys will be required for economic assessment of such fields. Further study of nodule
fields at low frequencies is required to explain some apparently anomalous backscatter
characteristics at these frequencies. GLORIA remains the best tool for reconnaissance
surveys of large areas (e.g. entire Exclusive Economic Zones), even when mapping of Fe-Mn
nodule fields is the main survey objective, because the speed of survey outweighs any
disadvantages in terms of nodule field assessment. Such assessment can only proceed
efficiently after the extent of any nodule field has been mapped.
Acknowledgements
Discussions with M. L. Somers, Q. J. Huggett and T. P. LeBas greatly
assisted in the preparation of this reply. Reviews by D. Twichell and W. Danforth improved
the manuscript.
References
Scanlon, K.M. and Masson, D.G., 1992.
Fe-Mn nodule field indicated by GLORIA, north of the Puerto Rico Trench. Geo-Marine
Letters 12: 208-213.
Weydert, M.M.P., 1990. Measurements of the acoustic
backscatter of selected areas of the deep seafloor and some implications for
the assessment of manganese nodule resources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
88: 350-366.
Figure (click on image for closer view)
Figure 1. Change in backscatter intensity across the boundary of the
Fe-Mn nodule field north of the Puerto Rico Trench. The three backscatter curves show
sections across the boundary (heavy arrow), from the near, mid and far range of the sonar
field. Because the sections were drawn parallel to the sonar vehicle track, each section
is free from range-dependent signal variation, and a simple comparison of backscatter
intensity across the boundary can be made for each section. An average backscatter
contrast (dB) between sedimented seafloor and the nodule field is shown for each section.
These were calculated using an average digital number (DN) value for each acoustic facies,
with appropriate corrections for the non-linear signal compression in the recording
system. See text for a full discussion of the significance of the measured acoustic
contrasts. |
|