BACKGROUND
Home/Abstract
Site Map
Introduction
Content Overview
How to Reach Us
METHODS
Database
Construction
RESULTS &
DISCUSSION
How
to Access the
Data
Data
Utilization
Data
Tables & Maps
Geographic
Context & Outside Links
CREDITS
References Cited
Collaborators
Acknowledgements
DISCLAIMER
|
EXAMPLE:
The Distribution of Lead in Gulf of Maine Sediments- Query results from
the Contaminated-Sediment Database
RESULTS
A series of questions
are presented with plots and maps that are created from data contained
in the CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS DATABASE FOR THE GULF OF MAINE.
Where are
the highest concentrations of metal contamination in Gulf of Maine sediments?
Both
Lead (Fig 6) and Copper (Fig
7) in modern sediments have highest concentrations near urban centers.
For most common industrial contaminants in New England, the magnitude
of pollution in marine sediments is closely related to the local population
density (Fig 8). This occurs because
most industrial activities are located near cities, sewage disposal
requirements are a direct function of population, and transportation-related
pollution is greatest where there are a lot of people. This differs
from some situations in the western parts of the U.S., where the highest
metal concentrations are associated with sites of historical mining
and smelting activities.
What concentrations of lead occur naturally in
sediments and how can one tell if sediments are contaminated with lead?
Most coastal surface sediments in the Gulf
have lead concentrations no greater than 10 times that of background
(Fig 9). Naturally occurring, i.e.
"background", values of an element differ for differing types
of minerals and sediment types. Samples that are very far from contaminant
sources or samples that were deposited prior to the Industrial Revolution
(those from deep in cores, Fig 10) are
used to determine regional background values. Concentrations that are
greater than background are "enriched" and, if enrichment
is sufficiently great, may be considered contaminated or polluted. In
muddy sediment, background values are around 18 µg/g for Pb and 15 µg/g
for Cu. Backgrounds are lower in sands.
Can
the concentrations of lead found in these sediments cause toxic effects?
One way of estimating the potential for biota
to experience detrimental effects when exposed to particular sediments
is to compare concentrations of individual contaminants
with guidelines for sediment quality criteria
that are determined in laboratory tests. The color coding of Pb (Fig
6, Fig. 11 for area insets) and Cu (Fig
7) concentrations show locations of sediment that have: little or
no enrichment in Pb or Cu (green = background); those which are contaminated
but unlikely to cause any toxic effects (blue < ER-L); those where
some detrimental effects may occur (orange between ER-L and ER-M); and
those with contaminant concentrations so enriched that toxic effects
are likely to occur (red between ER-L and ER-M). The greatest enrichment
observed for Pb and Cu is 400 times the naturally occurring background
values. All urban areas have some samples with sediment concentrations
that may cause some toxic effects in the ecosystem.
Can
the patterns of lead enrichment be used to approximate the distribution
of other contaminants?
Many of contaminants are often introduced to the
environment from common sources. Certain classes of contaminants also
have similar chemical behavior in the ecosystem and will have a common
mobility and fate. When contaminants are shown to correlate (Fig
12), one contaminant can indeed be used as a proxy for another if
no other data are available.
What
do differences between patterns for various elements indicate?
Differing patterns indicate a variation in sources or partitioning
during contaminant transport. Changing elemental ratios, e.g. Pb/Cu,
in samples from different times or places can be used to identify processes.
In Fig 13, the greater input of atmospheric
sources for Pb than for Cu is reflected in a weak trend of increasing
Pb/Cu ratio with distance offshore from population centers.
The use of histograms (Fig 14) allows statistical
comparison of patterns for differing areas, which might have very different
sample coverage.
What
are the dominant factors controlling the distribution of lead in Gulf
sediments?
The present concentration results from a complex interaction of
the input type and location, the variability and sorption capacity of
the sediment substrate, and the mobility of deposited Pb in situ. The
presence of fine-grained sediment is indicative of areas of low energy
(hence net deposition) and high particle surface area (hence large sorption
capacity). Sediment texture (Fig 15) is consequently
often used to estimate regions of contaminant accumulation and for normalization
to remove effects of natural variability in the sediments. Normalization
of the Pb concentration to sediment grain size (Fig
16) does not markedly reduce the spatial heterogeneity of the data
in the Boston Harbor sediments, suggesting that source proximity and
other factors are more important than texture for controlling or predicting
Pb concentrations in this region near shore. The effects of substrate,
source, and mobility cannot be separated in the offshore Gulf of Maine
because there are not enough samples that have both Pb and texture data.
Have lead
concentrations in sediments of the Gulf of Maine decreased with time?
The range in lead concentrations within the Gulf
is so large, ranging from background to highly polluted, that temporal
changes are masked by spatial variability unless the query is carefully
restricted to avoid or normalize for variations in substrate composition.
Inspection of either historical data from a depositional region (Fig
17), or profile data from cores in the database (Fig.
18, Bothner, et al, 1998) show that concentrations in muddy, surface
sediments near urban centers have decreased slightly over the last 20
years. The decrease in surface sediment Pb concentration is less than
reductions in pollutant sources might suggest because sediments deposited
in the past can be moved up to the sediment surface by biological mixing
and sediment transport processes. There is insufficient data to say
what the situation is in the deeper basins of the Gulf where the primary
source of lead contamination is atmospheric deposition.
|