Skip past header information
USGS - science for a changing world
NOAA Logo with link to NOAA Home Page.Massachusetts CZM Logo with link to MA CZM Home Page.  

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1222

Sea-Floor Geology and Sedimentary Processes in the Vicinity of Cross Rip Channel, Nantucket Sound, Offshore Southeastern Massachusetts


Methods

Skip past contents information
Click on figures for larger images
Thumbnail image of figure 6 and link to larger figure. Photograph of the NOAA ship Thomas Jefferson.
Figure 6. Port-side view of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ship Thomas Jefferson at sea.
Thumbnail image of figure 7 and link to larger figure. Photograph of the launch used in the survey.
Figure 7. Image showing launch 3102 being deployed from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ship Thomas Jefferson.
Thumbnail image of figure 8 and link to larger figure. Photograph of the launch used in the survey.
Figure 8. Starboard-side view of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration launch 3102 at sea.
Thumbnail image of figure 9 and link to larger figure. Photograph of a multibeam echosounder used in the survey.
Figure 9. The RESON Seabat 8125 multibeam echosounder hull-mounted to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration launch 3101.
Thumbnail image of figure 10 and link to larger figure. A photograph of a multibeam echosounder used in the survey.
Figure 10. The RESON 7125 multibeam echosounder hull-mounted to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Ship Thomas Jefferson.
Thumbnail image of figure 11 and link to larger figure. A photograph of equipment used for sound velocity corrections.
Figure 11. Brooke Ocean Technology Moving Vessel Profiler with a Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc., conductivity-temperature-depth profiler used to correct sound velocities for the multibeam data.
Thumbnail image of figure 12 and link to larger figure. A photograph of the CTD used in the survey.
Figure 12. Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc., SEACAT conductivity-temperature-depth profiler.
Thumbnail image of figure 13 and link to larger figure. A photograph of the RV Rafael.
Figure 13. Image shows a port-side view of the U.S. Geological Survey RV Rafael that was used to collect bottom photography and sediment samples during USGS cruise 2011-006-FA.
Thumbnail image of figure 14 and link to larger figure. A photograph of the device used to collect sediment and photographic data in the study area.
Figure 14. View of the small SEABOSS, a modified Van Veen grab equipped with still and video photographic systems, mounted on the aft starboard side of the RV Rafael.
Thumbnail image of figure 15 and link to larger figure. A map showing station locations in the study area.
Figure 15. Map showing the station locations used to verify the acoustic data with bottom sampling and photography during U.S. Geological Survey cruise 2011-006-FA.
Thumbnail image of figure 16 and link to larger figure. A chart showing grain-size relationships.
Figure 16. Correlation chart showing the relationships between phi sizes, millimeter diameters, size classifications, and ASTM and Tyler sieve sizes.
Thumbnail image of figure 17 and link to larger figure. A chart showing sediment classification.
Figure 17. Sediment classification scheme from Shepard (1954), as modified by Schlee (1973) and Poppe and others (2004).
Multibeam Bathymetry

The NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson and two 8.5-m aluminum Jensen launches (3101 and 3102) deployed from the ship acquired multibeam bathymetric data from the study area over an approximately 10.4-km² area during 2009 (figs. 6, 7, 8). The multibeam echosounder (MBES) data were collected with a hull-mounted RESON SeaBat 455-kilohertz (kHz) 8125 shallow-water system aboard launch 3101 (fig. 9) and RESON single frequency (400-kHz) 7125 systems aboard launch 3102 and the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson (fig. 10). Original vertical resolution of the multibeam bathymetric data was 0.5 m for water depths less than 20 m and 1 m for the deeper parts of the survey area. The bathymetric datasets were acquired and digitally logged with HYPACK Hysweep, and processed by NOAA using CARIS Hydrographic Image Processing System (HIPS) software for quality control, to incorporate sound velocity and tidal corrections, and combined into a 1-m grid to produce the final digital terrain model (DTM). A more detailed description of the acquisition parameters and processing steps performed by NOAA and the USGS to create the datasets presented in this report are included in the metadata files. These files can be accessed through the Data Catalog section of this report. Vertically exaggerated (5x), hill-shaded (illuminated from 0° N. at an angle of 45°) imagery was created using CARIS HIPS software.

Horizontal positioning was by differential global positioning systems (DGPS); Hypack 2009 was used for acquisition-line navigation. Sound-velocity corrections were derived with frequent conductivity-temperature-depth profiles. A Brooke Ocean Technology Moving Vessel Profiler (MVP) with an Applied Microsystems Smart Sound Velocity and Pressure (SV&P) sensor was used to collect sound-speed profile data from the ship (fig. 11). Manually deployed Seabird Electronics SBE-19+ CTD units were used to collect sound-speed profile data from the launches (fig. 12). Tidal-zone corrections were calculated from data acquired by the National Water Level Observation Network station at Nantucket Island, Massachusetts (8449130). The vertical datum is mean lower low water. Detailed descriptions of the MBES acquisition and processing can be found in the Descriptive Report (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2009a) and in the Data Acquisition and Processing Report (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2009b).

Sampling and Photography

Sediment sampling and bottom photography were conducted in June 2011 aboard the RV Rafael (fig. 13) during cruise 2011-006-FA. Surficial-sediment samples (0-2 cm below the sediment-water interface) and bottom photography were collected at 24 stations with a modified Van Veen grab sampler equipped with still- and video-camera systems (fig. 14, 15). The photographic data were used to appraise intra-station bottom variability, faunal communities, and sedimentary structures (indicative of geological and biological processes) and to observe boulder fields where samples could not be collected. A gallery of images collected as part of this project is provided in the Bottom Photography section of this report; locations of the bottom photographs can be accessed through the Data Catalog section.

In the laboratory, the sediment samples were disaggregated and wet sieved to separate the coarse and fine fractions. The fine fraction (less than 62 microns) was analyzed by Coulter Counter, the coarse fraction was analyzed by sieving, and the data were corrected for salt content. Sediment descriptions are based on the nomenclature proposed by Wentworth (1922; fig. 16) and the size classifications proposed by Shepard (1954; fig. 17). A detailed discussion of the laboratory methods employed is given in Poppe and others (2005). Because biogenic carbonate shells commonly form in situ, they usually are not considered to be sedimentologically representative of the depositional environment. Therefore, gravel-sized bivalve shells and other biogenic carbonate debris were ignored. The grain-size analysis data can be accessed through the Data Catalog section of this report; a data dictionary is available in the Sediment Distribution section.

To facilitate interpretations of the distributions of surficial sediment and sedimentary environments, these data were supplemented by sediment data from compilations of earlier studies (Poppe and others, 2003) and unpublished datasets from the National Geophysical Data Center. The interpretations of sea-floor features, surficial-sediment distributions, and sedimentary environments presented herein are based on data from the sediment-sampling and bottom-photography stations, on tonal changes in backscatter on the imagery, and on the bathymetry. For the purposes of this report, bedforms are defined by morphology and amplitude. Sand waves are higher than 1 m; megaripples are 0.2 to 1 m high; ripples are less than 0.2 m high (Ashley, 1990). The bathymetric grids and imagery released in this report should not be used for navigation.


To view files in PDF format, download a free copy of Adobe Reader.

 

Skip USGS links group

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USAGov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
End of USGS links group