Hydrogeology, Water Budget, and Simulated Groundwater Availability in the Salt Fork Arkansas River and Chikaskia River Alluvial Aquifers, Northern Oklahoma, 1980–2020
Links
- Document: Report (29.0 MB pdf) , HTML , XML
- Figure: Figure 14, 11" X 17" (9.53 MB pdf)
- Data Releases:
- USGS Data Release - MODFLOW-NWT model used in hydrogeology and simulated groundwater availability in the Salt Fork Arkansas River aquifer, northern Oklahoma, 1980–2020
- USGS Data Release - U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database
- Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core
Abstract
The 1973 Oklahoma Groundwater Law (Oklahoma Statute §82–1020.5) requires that the Oklahoma Water Resources Board conduct hydrologic investigations of the State’s aquifers to determine the maximum annual yield for each groundwater basin. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, conducted an updated hydrologic investigation of the Salt Fork Arkansas River and Chikaskia River alluvial aquifers in northern Oklahoma for the study period spanning 1980–2020 and evaluated the simulated effects of potential groundwater withdrawals on groundwater flow and availability in the Salt Fork Arkansas River alluvial aquifer. A hydrogeologic framework and conceptual model were developed to guide the development of a numerical model.
Three groundwater-availability scenarios were evaluated by using the calibrated numerical model, which was focused on the Salt Fork Arkansas River alluvial aquifer. These scenarios were used to (1) estimate equal-proportionate-share groundwater withdrawal rates, (2) quantify the potential effects of projected well withdrawals on groundwater storage over a 50-year period, and (3) simulate the potential effects of a hypothetical 10-year drought. The 20-, 40-, and 50-year equal-proportionate-share groundwater withdrawal rates for the Salt Fork Arkansas River alluvial aquifer under normal recharge conditions were about 0.63, 0.58, and 0.57 acre-foot per acre per year, respectively. Projected 50-year groundwater withdrawal scenarios were used to simulate the effects of modified well withdrawal rates. Because well withdrawals were less than 2 percent of the calibrated numerical-model water budget, changes to the well groundwater withdrawal rates had little effect on simulated Salt Fork Arkansas River base flows and groundwater storage in the Salt Fork Arkansas River alluvial aquifer. A hypothetical 10-year drought scenario was used to simulate the potential effects of a prolonged period of reduced recharge on groundwater storage. Groundwater storage at the end of the hypothetical drought period was 14.5 percent less than the groundwater storage of the calibrated numerical model without the simulated drought.
Suggested Citation
Gammill, N.C., and Smith, S.J., 2025, Hydrogeology, water budget, and simulated groundwater availability in the Salt Fork Arkansas River and Chikaskia River alluvial aquifers, northern Oklahoma, 1980–2020: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2025–5043, 111 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20255043.
ISSN: 2328-0328 (online)
Study Area
Table of Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Hydrogeology of the Salt Fork Arkansas River and Chikaskia River Aquifers and Surrounding Units
- Hydrogeologic Framework
- Conceptual Groundwater-Flow Model and Water Budget
- Numerical Groundwater-Flow Model
- Groundwater-Availability Scenarios
- Model Limitations
- Summary
- References Cited
Publication type | Report |
---|---|
Publication Subtype | USGS Numbered Series |
Title | Hydrogeology, water budget, and simulated groundwater availability in the Salt Fork Arkansas River and Chikaskia River alluvial aquifers, northern Oklahoma, 1980–2020 |
Series title | Scientific Investigations Report |
Series number | 2025-5043 |
DOI | 10.3133/sir20255043 |
Publication Date | June 25, 2025 |
Year Published | 2025 |
Language | English |
Publisher | U.S. Geological Survey |
Publisher location | Reston, VA |
Contributing office(s) | Oklahoma-Texas Water Science Center |
Description | Report: xii, 111 p.; 1 Figure: 11.00 x 17.00 inches: 2 Data Releases |
Country | United States |
State | Oklahoma |
Online Only (Y/N) | Y |