USGS - science for a changing world

Data Series 931


Hurricane Sandy Shoreline Response and Recovery at Fire Island, New York: Shoreline and Beach Profile Data, October 2012 to October 2014

Skip Links

Index
Abstract
Introduction
Survey Overview
Data Processing
Error Analysis
Data Downloads
Abbreviations
References
Acknowledgments
 

Survey Overview

Prior to and following Hurricane Sandy in October, 2012, DGPS data were collected alongshore and cross-shore to assess the morphologic impacts of the storm. The survey effort began one day prior to landfall (October 28, 2012), and was repeated three days following the storm (Nov 01, 2012), and at monthly and bi-monthly intervals for 24 months (to October 2014). Data were collected at 0.5-second intervals using an Ashtech Z-Xtreme GPS surveying instrument, and post-processed using positional data from a base receiver to achieve sub-decimeter accuracies.

Cross-shore profiles were collected in western and central regions of Fire Island to capture the storm response in areas that vary morphologically and geologically. In all, ten profile locations were surveyed, extending from just inland of the crest of the dune to the low-tide swash zone. The cross shore profile surveys covered sixteen dates from October 28, 2012 to October 07, 2014.

Alongshore data were collected on shore-parallel tracks to capture the base of the dune, the mid-beach, and the upper and lower foreshore. Over the course of 23 months, 13 surveys were conducted collecting data along shore-parallel tracks to capture the upper and lower foreshore. The alongshore tracks extend from the western boundary of Fire Island National Seashore to the western flank of the Wilderness breach.

Base Station

The original base station at the Fire Island Coast Guard (FICG) station was set on a control point established by the USGS (fig. 2). The control point was established from multiple GPS occupations and processed using the National Geodetic Survey (NGS)—Online Positioning User Service (OPUS) (http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/). The control point was referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) (CORS96) ellipsoid. This base station was used for surveys conducted from October 2012 through January 2014. In the spring of 2014, a permanent survey marker was placed at Robbins Rest (REST) by the National Park Service (fig. 3). The control for REST was established using multiple GPS occupations, processed using OPUS, and referenced to NAD 83 (CORS96). This station was used for June and September 2014 surveys and can be used for future surveys.

Base station at Fire Island Coast Guard station.
Figure 2. Base station at Fire Island Coast Guard (FICG) station. [larger version]
    Base station at Robins Rest
Figure 3. Base station at Robbins Rest (REST), spring 2014. Image on the right shows the permanent survey marker protected inside polyvinyl chloride (PVC) casing. [larger version]

Survey Equipment and Setup

Survey equipment included Asthech Z-Xtreme receivers, Ashtech Choke Ring antenna, Ashtech Geodetic antenna, fixed height tripods, GPS staff affixed to a wheel, and GPS staff affixed to a Polaris ATV. The rover antenna was attached to the ATV by inserting a survey rod into one of the holes in the edge of the cargo bed and hose-clamping to one of the roof supports (fig. 4).

Post-Processing

Raw L1/L2 phase data were collected at the base and at the rover, and the data were post-processed. Post-processing of base data was accomplished by using OPUS, and transformations were done using NGS Horizontal Time-Dependent Positioning (HTDP) (http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/TOOLS/Htdp/Htdp.shtml). Post-processing of kinematic data was done using Novatel/Waypoint Grafnav software. Differential correction post-processing software was used to correct the rover with the control points (FICG or REST) described above.

Quality-Control Measures

Error sources for GPS data collection can be broken down into two categories: uncontrollable random error associated with the signal itself or systematic error associated with the collection of the signal. Since there is no way to control the random error, precautions were taken to minimize the systematic error. To do this the following quality-control measures were implemented in the field. On all base occupations, fixed-height tripods with bubble levels were used to ensure accurate height and true vertical positioning, while tie downs and weighted legs were used to keep the tripod from shifting during data collection (figs. 2–3). A fixed-height wheeled mount (fig. 4) was used for hand-surveying cross-shore profiles. Antenna height for the rover (fig. 5) was measured by hand, using an average of multiple measurements, and a bubble level was used to ensure the antenna placement was as close to true vertical as possible. Finally, to ensure that the control point had not been disturbed between surveys, each base station occupation used for rover control was run through OPUS to ensure its integrity.

Surveying with wheeled rover, and view of all-terrain vehicle setup.
Figure 4. Surveying with wheeled rover, and view of all-terrain vehicle (ATV) setup. [larger version]
    Detailed view of GPS setup in the ATV.
Figure 5. Detailed view of GPS setup in the ATV. [larger version]

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/0931/ds931_survey-overview.html
Page Contact Information: Contact USGS
Page Last Modified: Monday, November 28, 2016, 08:35:37 PM