Link to USGS home page Link to USGS home page
Coastal and Marine Geology Program
Coastal & Marine Geology Program > South Carolina Coastal Erosion Study > Open File Report 2004-1013

Maps Showing the Stratigraphic Framework of South Carolina's Long Bay from Little River to Winyah Bay

USGS Open File Report 2004-1013

by: Wayne E. Baldwin, Robert A. Morton, Jane F. Denny, Shawn V. Dadisman, William C. Schwab, Paul T. Gayes, and Neal W. Driscoll

Introduction
Setting
Geophysical Data:
Acquisition
Processing &
Interpretation
Mapping Results:
Bathymetry &
Sidescan Sonar
Seismic
Stratigraphy
Summary
Acknowledg-
ments
References
List of Figures
Disclaimer

Setting

South Carolina's Long Bay fronts approximately 100 km of the state's northeastern coast, known as the Grand Strand, located between the North Carolina border and the tidal estuary of Winyah Bay (Figure 2). In general, the vertical stratigraphic sequence landward of the study area consists of indurated to unconsolidated Cretaceous, Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary units. Table 1 (Colquhoun and Muthig, 1991; Colquhoun and others, 1991) summarizes the names and estimated ages of formations mapped within the Lower Coastal Plain, including Horry and Georgetown Counties. Hayes (1994) describes the coastal compartment from Bogue Inlet, North Carolina (located just south of Cape Fear) to Debidue Island, South Carolina as consisting of predominantly wave-dominated, welded barrier islands and barrier spits, interrupted by segments of Pleistocene mainland beach. Several small tidal inlets and swashes separate these beaches and barriers, providing localized drainage for adjacent upland areas. Seaward, the inner continental shelf is low relief and largely sediment-limited, covered by a patchy and discontinuous sand sheet. Where sediment comprising the sand sheet is relatively thick (2 - 6 m) it has been reworked into bedforms of varying scale. In other locations the sand sheet is absent, exposing underlying Cretaceous/Tertiary strata and paleochannel fill at the seafloor (Wright and others, 1999; Ojeda and others, 2001; Baldwin, 2002). This coastal configuration is largely the result of regional tectonics, eustacy, and modern coastal processes.

Table 1. Table of Cretaceous to Holocene Formations identified within the northeastern South Carolina Coastal Plain. Modified from Colquhoun and others, 1991 (Pliocene and younger units), and Colquhoun and Muthig, 1991 (Eocene and older units). [Download a 44 KB PDF version of Table 1].
  Formation Estimated Age Reference
Waiter Island Holocene DuBar and others, 1974
Ocean Forest Peat Holocene 6-3 ka DuBar and others, 1974
Wando Formation ca. 120 to 90 ka Owens, 1990
Fluvial Terrace I Late Pleistocene DuBar and others, 1974; DuBar, 1987
Fluvial Terrace II Late Pleistocene DuBar and others, 1974; DuBar, 1987
Socastee Formation Middle? Pleistocene DuBar, 1971; Blackwelder, 1981a,b; Cronin and others, 1981; Liddicoat and Opdyke, 1981
ca 200 ka Wehmiller and Belknap, 1982
ca 450 to 200 ka McCarten and others, 1982, 1983
ca 200 ka Owens, 1990
Fluvial Terrace III Middle to Late Pleistocene DuBar and others, 1974
Canepatch Formation Middle or Late Pleistocene DuBar and others, 1974; DuBar, 1987; Cronin and others, 1981
Mollusk Zone M2 Blackwelder, 1981a
Middle Pleistocene McCarten and others, 1982
Middle Pleistocene Wehmiller and Belknap, 1982
460 ± 1 ka Szabo, 1985
ca. 450 ka Owens, 1990
Penholoway Formation Early to Middle Pleistocene 1.6 to 0.76 Ma Owens, 1990
Waccamaw Formation Pliocene Various Authors
Early Pleistocene DuBar and others, 1974; DuBar, 1987
1.6 to 1.25 Ma Blackwelder, 1981b
1.8 to 1.6 Ma Owens, 1990
Bear Bluff Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene? DuBar, 1971; DuBar and others, 1974
Late Pliocene Owens, 1990; DuBar, 1987
Duplin Miocene Dall, 1898
Pliocene Campbell and others, 1975; DuBar and others, 1974; DuBar, 1987
Santee Limestone Middle Eocene Sloan (1908); Van Nieuwenhuise and Colquhoun, 1982a,b; Colquhoun and others, 1983
Black Mingo Grp. Unnamed Unit Lower Eocene
Walliamsburg Formation Paleocene (Thanetian)
Rhems Formation Paleocene (Danian)
  Pee Dee Formation Cretaceous (Maastrichtian/Campanian)

Limited sediment supply has played an important role in the evolution of the area since the late-Cretaceous/early-Paleocene, when uplift of the Cape Fear Arch (CFA), or Mid-Carolina Platform High (MCPH, Riggs and others, 1985; Riggs and Belknap, 1988) was initiated (Colquhoun and others, 1983; Sohl and Owens, 1991, Figure 2). Uplift of this post-rift structural feature has effectively diverted large volumes of Cenozoic sediment into the adjacent Albemarle and Southeast Georgia embayments (Colquhoun and others, 1983, Owens and Gohn, 1985; Gohn, 1988, Figure 2). A stratigraphic cross-section of the Atlantic Southeastern Lower Coastal Plain illustrates the absence of Cenozoic sediment overlying the CFA/MCPH and a gradual thickening of Cenozoic sediment with distance from its axis (Gohn, 1988, Figure 3).

Generalized stratigraphic cross-section along the modern coast line from Florida to North Carolina. Figure 3. Generalized stratigraphic cross-section along the modern coast line from Florida to North Carolina. Adapted from Plate 9 of Maher and Applin (1971) using data in Applin and Applin (1965), Brown and others (1972), Gohn and Others (1977), Valentine (1979), and Applegate and others (1981). The names of the numbered wells are: 1. Bass Enter-Pumpkin Bay; 2. Humble-Collier #1; 3. Humble-Tucson #1; 4. Humble-Carroll #1; 5. Sun Oil-Powell Land #1; 6. Humble-Foremost #1; 7. California-Buie #1; 8. Larue-Jelks and Rodgers #1; 9. U.S.-Parris Island #2; 10. USGS-Clubhouse Crossroads #1; 11. USGS-Brittons Neck #1; 12. USGS-Calabash #1; 13. Karston-Laughton #1; 14. Standard Oil-Hatteras Light #1; a5. Stanard Oil - Esso #2 (from Gohn, 1988). [larger version]

Historically, the major source of sediment to Long Bay has been via Piedmont and coastal plain draining rivers (Figures 2 and 4), which deliver large quantities of sediment, primarily derived from the Appalachian Mountains and the Piedmont (Hayes, 1994). Fluctuation in sea level throughout the Pleistocene caused deposition of beach barrier complexes or "terraces" throughout the lower Coastal Plain (Colquhoun, 1965, 1968 and 1969; Colquhoun and others, 1972; Dubar and others, 1974 and 1980, Figure 4). These barriers diverted the rivers, generally parallel to the coastline. The Myrtle Beach barrier complex (Figure 4) caused significant diversion of the Pee Dee, Waccamaw and Black Rivers to the southernmost extent of Long Bay, where they now share a common confluence at Winyah Bay (Figures 2 and 4). Discharged sediment is now dominantly deposited within the Winyah Bay estuary, which appears to be an efficient sediment sink (Patchineelam and others, 1999).

Geomorphological map of southeastern North Carolina and northeastern South Carolina. Figure 4. Geomorphological map of southeastern North Carolina and northeastern South Carolina (modified from DuBar and others, 1974). Pleistocene and Holocene barrier systems are shown. The sections of these terraces dissected by Piedmont (blue color) and Coastal Plain (brown color) rivers on their way to the coast are also illustrated. [larger version]

Multiple phases of subaerial exposure and marine transgression, associated with fluctuations of sea level, have caused erosional truncation of the Cretaceous/Tertiary sedimentary units that underlie the inner continental shelf within Long Bay. These units crop out in areas where surficial sediment is absent. Without contribution from fluvial sediment sources, the Cretaceous and Tertiary continental shelf strata, and the deposits that comprise the mainland beaches and barriers, become the main source of sediment for the Long Bay sediment budget (Gayes, and others, 2003). Pleistocene transgressions and regressions have assisted in liberating sediment from these sources in the past, and storm events and day-to-day hydrodynamic processes continue to rework this material and incorporate it into the deposits and bedforms observed on the inner continental shelf (Pilkey, and others, 1981).

Introduction | Setting | Geophysical Data: Acquisition | Geophysical Data: Processing & Interpretation | Mapping Results: Bathymetry & Sidescan Sonar | Maping Results: Seismic Stratigraphy | Summary | Acknowledgements | References | List of Figures | Disclaimer

Coastal & Marine Geology Program > South Carolina Coastal Erosion Study > Open File Report 2004-1013


[an error occurred while processing this directive]