Long-Term Water-Quality Constituent Trends in the Little Arkansas River, South-Central Kansas, 1995–2021

Scientific Investigations Report 2023-5102
Prepared in cooperation with the city of Wichita, Kansas
By:  and 

Metrics

3
Crossref references
Web analytics dashboard Metrics definitions

Links

  • Document: Report (5.5 MB pdf) , HTML , XML
  • Tables:
    • Table 2.1 (20 KB xlsx) - Summary statistics for continuously (hourly) measured turbidity data measured with different sensors at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas; Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans.; and Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans., 2004–19
    • Table 2.1 (2.2 KB csv)
    • Table 3.1 (27 KB xlsx) - Relative percentage differences for discrete replicate pairs and detection percentages for blank discrete water-quality samples for the Little Arkansas River sites near Sedgwick, Kansas, 1995–2021
    • Table 3.1 (6.3 KB csv)
    • Tables 7.1–7.3 (108 KB xlsx)
    • Table 7.1 (12 KB csv) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season estimated mean, flow-normalized, and generalized mean concentrations for primary ions at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., 1995–2021
    • Table 7.2 (10 KB csv) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season estimated mean, flow-normalized, and generalized mean concentrations for nutrients and carbon species at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., 1995–2021
    • Table 7.3 (8 KB csv) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season estimated mean, flow-normalized, and generalized mean concentrations or densities for sediment, indicator bacteria, and trace elements at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., 1995–2021
    • Tables 8.1–8.3 (112 KB xlsx)
    • Table 8.1 (12 KB csv) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season estimated mean, flow-normalized, and generalized mean fluxes for primary ions at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., 1995–2021
    • Table 8.2 (10 KB csv) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season estimated mean, flow-normalized, and generalized mean fluxes for nutrients and carbon species at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., 1995–2021
    • Table 8.3 (9 KB csv) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season estimated mean, flow-normalized, and generalized mean fluxes for sediment, indicator bacteria, and trace elements at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., 1995–2021
    • Table 11.1 (51 KB xlsx) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season estimated yearly water-quality constituent loads at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas and near Sedgwick, Kans., 1998–2021
    • Table 11.1 (14 KB csv)
  • Figure: Figure 1.1 (2.7 MB pdf) - Relations between turbidity sensors, 2004–19. A, YSI 6026 (YSI6026) and YSI 6136 (YSI6136) at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas
  • Appendixes:
    • Appendix 4 (1.1 MB zip) - Surrogate Regression Model Archive Summaries for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas
    • Appendix 5 (2.7 MB zip) - Surrogate Regression Model Archive Summaries for the Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kansas
    • Appendix 6 (2.6 MB zip) - Surrogate Regression Model Archive Summaries for the Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kansas
    • Appendix 9 (35 MB zip) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Graphical Output at station 07143672
    • Appendix 10 (46 MB zip) - Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Graphical Output at station 07144100
  • Dataset: USGS National Water Information System database —USGS water data for the Nation
  • Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shawn Maloney and Scott Macey of the city of Wichita for technical assistance and providing information about the Equus Beds aquifer storage and recovery project. The authors appreciate the assistance of Vernon Strasser and the laboratory staff at the city of Wichita Municipal Water and Wastewater Laboratory for providing a substantial proportion of the chemical analyses used for model development.

The authors thank the U.S. Geological Survey staff that assisted with data collection, analysis, and interpretation, including Trudy Bennett, John Rosendale, David Eason, and Diana Restrepo-Osorio. The authors also thank U.S. Geological Survey technical reviewers Kyle Juracek, Luis Garcia, and Brent Hall.

Abstract

The Equus Beds aquifer and Cheney Reservoir are primary sources for the city of Wichita’s current (2023) water supply. The Equus Beds aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) project was developed by the city of Wichita in the early 1990s to meet future water demands using the Little Arkansas River as an artificial aquifer recharge water source during above-base-flow conditions. Little Arkansas River water is removed from the river at an ASR Facility intake structure, treated using National Primary Drinking Water Regulations as a guideline, and is infiltrated into the Equus Beds aquifer through recharge basins or injected into the aquifer through recharge wells for later use. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the city of Wichita, completed this study to quantify and characterize Little Arkansas River water-quality data. Data in this report can be used to evaluate changing conditions, provide science-based information for decision making, and help meet regulatory requirements.

Continuous (hourly) physicochemical properties were measured, and discrete water-quality samples were collected from three Little Arkansas River sites located along the easternmost extent of the Equus Beds aquifer during 1995 through 2021 over a range of streamflow conditions. The Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, streamgage (U.S. Geological Survey station 07143672; hereafter referred to as the “Highway 50 site”) is located upstream from the other two sites, and the Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., streamgage (U.S. Geological Survey station 07144100; hereafter referred to as the “Sedgwick site”) is located downstream from the other two sites; these two sites bracket most of the easternmost part of the Equus Beds aquifer. The Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans., streamgage (U.S. Geological Survey station 375350097262800; hereafter referred to as the “Upstream ASR site”) is located between the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, about 14.7 river miles (mi) downstream from the Highway 50 site, about 1.7 river mi upstream from the Sedgwick site, and immediately upstream from the ASR Facility intake structure. Surrogate models for water-quality constituents of interest (including bromide, dissolved organic carbon, 2-chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine [deethylatrazine], atrazine, and metolachlor) were updated or developed using continuously measured and concomitant discrete data. These surrogate models, along with previously developed regression models, were used to compute concentrations (at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites) and loads (at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites) during the study period. Federal criteria were used to evaluate water quality. Where applicable, water-quality data were compared to Federal national drinking-water regulations. Flow-normalized water-quality constituent trends were evaluated using Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS) statistical models and water-quality trends were described using WRTDS bootstrap tests.

Continuously computed primary ion concentrations were generally larger at the Highway 50 site compared to the Sedgwick site. During the study period, the Federal secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) for dissolved solids was exceeded 57 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 38 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site. Computed bromide concentrations were larger at the Highway 50 site and exceeded the city of Wichita treatment threshold about 70, 21, and 19 percent of the time at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. Chloride concentrations exceeded the Federal SMCL about 16 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and did not exceed the SMCL at the Sedgwick site. Continuous arsenic concentrations exceeded the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) 9 to 15 percent of the time at the Sedgwick and Highway 50 sites, respectively, during the study. Atrazine concentrations exceeded the Federal MCL 10 percent of the time at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and 14 percent of the time at the Upstream ASR site during the study; computed glyphosate concentrations at the Sedgwick site never exceeded the MCL during the study.

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized primary ion concentrations during 1995 through 2021 generally had downward trends and decreases were generally larger at the Highway 50 site compared to the Sedgwick site. Dissolved solids and chloride concentrations decreased at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites. Bromide had no trend at the Highway 50 site and a downward trend at the Sedgwick site. Nitrate plus nitrite and total phosphorus concentrations had upward trends at the Highway 50 site but downward trends at the Sedgwick site, whereas total organic carbon had upward trends at both sites. Nitrate plus nitrite, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total organic carbon fluxes had upward trends at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites. Suspended-sediment concentrations had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and had no trend at the Sedgwick site. Arsenic concentrations had downward trends at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites.

About one-quarter to one-half of the Little Arkansas River loads, including nutrients and sediment, were transported during 1 percent of the time during the study. Because streamflows are highly sensitive to climatic variation and an increase of extreme precipitation events in the Great Plains is expected, similar disproportionately large pollutant loading events may increase into the future. Continuous measurement of physicochemical properties in near-real time allowed characterization of Little Arkansas River surface water during conditions and time scales that would not have been possible otherwise and served as a complement to discrete water-quality sampling. Continuation of this water-quality monitoring will provide data to characterize changing conditions in the Little Arkansas River and possibly identify new and changing trends. Information in this report allows the city of Wichita to make informed municipal water-supply decisions using past and present water-quality conditions and trends in the watershed.

Introduction

Wichita, in south-central Kansas, is the largest city in the State of Kansas and has a population of about 395,700 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2021). The Equus Beds aquifer Wichita well field, constructed in the 1950s, and Cheney Reservoir (fig. 1), constructed in the 1960s, are primary sources for the city of Wichita’s current (2023) water supply. An Integrated Local Water Supply Plan was developed by the city of Wichita’s Water Utilities Department to address expected water demands through 2050, primarily by artificial recharge of the Equus Beds aquifer (City of Wichita, 1993). The Equus Beds aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) project diverts water from the Little Arkansas River during above-base-flow conditions, treats it using National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009) as a guideline, and either injects it or recharges it through spreading basins into the Equus Beds aquifer for later use to ensure that the city can meet water demand during an extended drought.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Wichita, completed this study of the Little Arkansas River, which is source water for the Equus Beds ASR project, to quantify and characterize Little Arkansas River water-quality conditions. Long-term Little Arkansas River water-quality data were collected from 1995 through 2021 to complete this study objective. Numerous studies summarizing Little Arkansas River water quality have been completed, including Tappa and others (2015), Stone and others (2016), Rasmussen and others (2016), Stone and others (2019), and Stone and Klager (2022).

Map showing the Little Arkansas River watershed and land use, the extent of the High
                     Plains aquifer, and the Equus Beds boundary in Kansas.
Figure 1.

Location of the study area near Wichita, south-central Kansas.

Equus Beds Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project

The city of Wichita, Kansas, uses the Equus Beds aquifer as a primary municipal water-supply source. Equus Beds aquifer water levels have decreased substantially (Hansen and others, 2014; Whisnant and others, 2015; Klager, 2016) because historically, irrigator, industrial, and municipal pumpage volume exceeded the natural aquifer recharge rate. The Wichita well field is susceptible to saltwater (including chloride) contamination from the Arkansas River and intrusion from existing upgradient plumes near Burrton, Kansas, caused by oil field evaporation pits remaining from the 1930s (Whittemore, 2007; Klager and others, 2014). The Equus Beds ASR project was created by the city of Wichita to help meet future water demands.

The Equus Beds ASR project currently (2023) consists of two coexisting phases:

  1. 1. Phase I began in 2007 and has the capacity to capture 10 million gallons per day (Mgal/d) of Little Arkansas River water and indirect streambank-diversion well water for recharge activity with water injection in four wells and two recharge basins. Directly diverted stream water is treated using membrane filtration and advanced oxidation to reduce sediment and remove organic material before being recharged through the two recharge basins; streambank-diversion well pumped water is not treated further before recharge through the injection wells or basins (Garinger and others, 2011).

  2. 2. Phase II began in 2013 and includes a 30-Mgal/d surface-water treatment facility, a 60-Mgal/d river intake facility equipped to divert 30 Mgal/d and treat 15 Mgal/d, eight recharge-injection wells, and a recharge basin. The facility capacity of 30 Mgal/d requires a streamflow of about 100 cubic feet per second (ft3/s) or greater at the Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., streamgage (USGS station 07144100; hereafter referred to as the “Sedgwick site”; fig. 1) to operate. Water is directly diverted from the Little Arkansas River at the intake structure when streamflow exceeds about 100 ft3/s at this site. The city of Wichita has a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (Kansas Permit number I-LA24-PO01; Federal Permit number KS0099694) to discharge waste from the ASR phase II surface-water treatment facility to the Little Arkansas River.

The ASR facilities have an operational period of April 15 through October 15 to avoid freezing conditions. The total amount of phase I and II recharge water was about 5.1 billion gallons during 2007 through 2021. More information about the city of Wichita ASR project is available at https://wichitaasr.org/.

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of this report is to document Little Arkansas River water quantity and quality; document the development and update of regression models that establish relations between continuous and discrete water-quality data; and characterize and quantify water-quality concentrations, loads, and trends during 1995 through 2021 for primary ions, nutrient and carbon species, sediment, indicator bacteria, trace elements, and pesticides. Water-quality constituents of interest were selected because of their relevance to water-supply or water-quality issues in the Equus Beds aquifer and the Little Arkansas River. Data from this report can be used to document surface-water quality, quantify potential pollutants, evaluate changing conditions, identify environmental factors affecting surface water, provide science-based information for decision making, and help meet regulatory monitoring requirements. Nationally, the methods and results presented in this report provide guidance and perspective for aquifer recharge projects conducted elsewhere.

Description of Study Area and Background Information

The study area is located in south-central Kansas northwest of Wichita (fig. 1). This study has three study sites along the Little Arkansas River. The Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kans., streamgage (USGS station 07143672; hereafter referred to as the “Highway 50 site,” fig. 1) is located upstream from the other sites. The Sedgwick site (fig. 1) is located downstream from the other sites. These two sites bracket a substantial portion of the easternmost part of the Equus Beds aquifer. The Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans., streamgage (USGS station 375350097262800; hereafter referred to as the “Upstream ASR site,” fig. 1) is located between the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, about 14.7 river miles (mi) downstream from the Highway 50 site, about 1.7 river mi upstream from the Sedgwick site, and immediately upstream from the ASR Facility intake structure (not shown). The contributing drainage areas for the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites are about 685 square miles (mi2) and about 1,165 mi2, respectively.

The Little Arkansas River has a contributing drainage area of about 1,266 mi2 (Albert and Stramel, 1966) of primarily agricultural land that produces mainly corn, sorghum, soybeans, and wheat (Kansas Department of Agriculture, 2021). About 65 percent of the Little Arkansas River watershed is cultivated crops and hay (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Fertilizers (such as nitrogen and phosphorus; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2022) and herbicides (such as atrazine, glyphosate, and metolachlor; Kansas Rural Center, 2018) are commonly applied in the drainage basin. Cattle and hogs are the primary livestock raised in the area (Kansas Department of Agriculture, 2021). Long-term mean annual precipitation (1900 through 2021) in the study area, based on data recorded near Mount Hope, Kans. (fig. 1; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2022), was 30.3 inches (table 1). Mean annual precipitation was 33.5 inches during the study period (1995 through 2021; table 1). Rock formations in the Little Arkansas River watershed are not well exposed because of low topographic relief and high erodability; rocks appearing at the land surface include the Wellington Formation and the Ninnescah shale of Permian age. Unconsolidated deposits of clay, silt, sand, and gravel also appear at the surface (Lane and Miller, 1965). Soils in the watershed range from clay and silty clay to sandy silt in the northern part; have developed from loess and alluvial deposits in the northern and central parts that range from clay to silty sand; and have developed from alluvium of Recent age in the southern part that range from clay to fine sand (Albert and Stramel, 1966).

Table 1.    

Annual total and mean annual precipitation during 1995 through 2021, and mean annual precipitation during 1900 through 2021 at the “MT HOPE” (Global Historical Climatology Network–Daily USC00145539) station.

[Data are from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2022)]

Year or period Total precipitation, in inches
1995 38.3
1996 32.7
1997 32.4
1998 35.2
1999 36.9
2000 31.8
2001 28.2
2002 33.6
2003 30.6
2004 39.8
2005 36.8
2006 25.9
2007 36.7
2008 38.5
2009 31.4
2010 34.5
2011 20.3
2012 23.6
2013 45.1
2014 25.0
2015 42.0
2016 41.5
2017 26.8
2018 35.0
2019 41.8
2020 28.3
2021 32.7
Mean annual during 1995 through 2021 33.5
Mean annual during 1900 through 2021 30.3
Table 1.    Annual total and mean annual precipitation during 1995 through 2021, and mean annual precipitation during 1900 through 2021 at the “MT HOPE” (Global Historical Climatology Network–Daily USC00145539) station.

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has listed several streams in the Little Arkansas River watershed as impaired waterways under section 303(d) of the 1972 Clean Water Act (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2022). Section 303(d) of the 1972 Clean Water Act requires States to identify water bodies with impaired water quality and the pollutants causing the impairments. Impairments for streams in or near the study area drainage basin include arsenic, chloride, and nitrate for water supply; dissolved oxygen, selenium, total suspended solids, atrazine, total phosphorus, biology (nutrients and oxygen demand impact on aquatic life), and sediment for aquatic life; and Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria for recreation (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2022). Major pollutants of concern for the Little Arkansas River watershed include atrazine, sediment, nutrients, and E. coli bacteria (Kansas State University Research and Extension and others, 2018).

A total maximum daily load (TMDL) is the maximum amount of a pollutant allowed in a water body while still meeting water-quality standards and are developed for each impairment-causing pollutant to determine reduction targets and management plans for reducing pollutants. The Little Arkansas River has defined TMDLs for atrazine (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2008), nutrients and oxygen demand (biology; Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2000b), sediment (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2000a), chloride (Kansas Department of Health and Environment 2006b), fecal coliform bacteria (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2000c), total suspended solids (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2014), total phosphorus and pH (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2019), and total phosphorus and dissolved oxygen (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2021).

Recent Investigations

The city of Wichita and USGS cooperative efforts began in the 1920s as the city began its water-supply development (Stone, 2017). Since 1995, the USGS has completed several studies to quantify and characterize Equus Beds aquifer and Little Arkansas River water quality. Equus Beds aquifer studies have indicated that the amount of aquifer water volume has recovered since the historic 1993 low because of less pumping, more natural recharge, and ASR (Klager, 2016). The chloride plume near Burrton, Kans., moves about 0.6 foot per day eastward toward the Wichita well field regardless of pumping (Klager and others, 2014). Recharge activity has not resulted in substantial effects on Equus Beds aquifer water quality, at least partially because the total amount of water recharged is small (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2016, 2019). Major recent Little Arkansas River findings include the following:

  1. 1. Little Arkansas River water-quality data were collected before (1995 through 2006) and concurrent with (2007 through 2012) ASR phase I activity as part of an effort to quantify effects that may be related to ASR phase I recharge (Tappa and others, 2015). Water-quality constituents of concern did not increase substantially and were likely more affected by climatological and natural processes than artificial recharge. Little Arkansas River sulfate concentrations rarely exceeded the Federal secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL; 250 milligrams per liter [mg/L]), and chloride concentrations exceeded the Federal SMCL (250 mg/L) about 20 percent of the time, primarily during minimal flow conditions. Little Arkansas River nitrate concentrations rarely exceeded the Federal maximum contaminant level (MCL; 10 mg/L), and arsenic concentrations exceeded the Federal MCL (10 micrograms per liter [µg/L]) about 19 percent of the time, primarily during low-flow conditions. Little Arkansas River dissolved iron and manganese concentrations exceeded their Federal SMCLs (300 µg/L and 50 µg/L, respectively) in about 5 and 50 percent of discretely collected samples, respectively. Atrazine exceeded the Federal MCL (3.0 µg/L) about 28 percent of the time, mostly during the late spring to early fall. Large densities of coliform bacterial indicators (total coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli) were detected in most Little Arkansas River samples (Tappa and others, 2015).

  2. 2. A hydrobiological monitoring program was developed and implemented to measure the effects of ASR phase II activity on Little Arkansas River water quality using data collected pre-ASR phase II implementation (2011 through 2012) and post-ASR phase II onset (2013 through 2014; Stone and others, 2016). Little Arkansas River water-quality constituent concentrations were controlled by hydrology rather than phase II ASR activity. Post-ASR nitrate and sediment concentrations were smaller than pre-ASR likely because of larger streamflows, and post-ASR organic carbon concentrations were larger than pre-ASR likely because of larger streamflows and runoff conditions. Pre- and post-ASR habitat, macroinvertebrate community, and fish community scores or metrics were similar (Stone and others, 2016).

  3. 3. Little Arkansas River water-quality data were collected during 2001 through 2016 to evaluate constituents of concern for aquifer recharge activity and compare water-quality data to their respective Federal criteria and to establish baseline conditions before further implementation of ASR (Stone and others, 2019). Little Arkansas River water-quality constituent concentrations did not increase in comparison to sampling that preceded (1995 through 2012) the study. Less than 1 percent of chloride and nitrate, 7 percent of dissolved iron, 48 percent of dissolved manganese, 12 percent of dissolved arsenic, and 39 percent of atrazine detections in Little Arkansas River samples exceeded Federal primary or secondary drinking-water criteria. None of the Little Arkansas River samples exceeded the Federal sulfate criterion, and every sample had detections of total coliform bacteria during the study (Stone and others, 2019).

  4. 4. Previously developed surrogate regression models used to continuously compute Little Arkansas River water-quality concentrations or densities of constituents of interest in real time were updated using data collected during 1998 through 2019 (Stone and Klager, 2022). Surrogate relations allow the concentrations or densities of many potential constituents of concern, including chloride, nutrients, sediment, bacteria, and atrazine to be estimated in near real time and characterized during conditions and time scales that would not be otherwise possible. Little Arkansas River real-time computations of water-quality constituents are available at the USGS National Real-Time Water Quality website (https://nrtwq.usgs.gov). Specific conductance was an explanatory variable for dissolved solids, primary ions, and atrazine; turbidity was an explanatory variable for total suspended solids and sediment, nutrients, total organic carbon, and indicator bacteria; and streamflow and water temperature were explanatory variables for dissolved arsenic (Stone and Klager, 2022).

Methods

Data collection followed protocols (Ziegler and Combs, 1997; Stone and others, 2012) developed for the Equus Beds ASR project. In addition to Ziegler and Combs (1997) and Stone and others (2012), numerous studies detailing Little Arkansas River water-quality sampling, processing, and analysis have been completed, including Ziegler and others (2010), Tappa and others (2015), Stone and others (2016), Stone and others (2019), and Stone and Klager (2022).

Data Collection

Continuous streamflow and physicochemical data and discrete water-quality data were collected from three surface-water sites along the Little Arkansas River over a range of streamflow conditions during 1995 through 2021 to evaluate water-quality conditions. Water-quality data were collected from the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites to quantify water-quality constituents of interest, develop or update previously published water-quality surrogate relations, compute water-quality constituent concentrations and loads, and identify water-quality constituent trends during 1995 through 2021. Data collected by the USGS are stored in the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

Continuous Streamflow and Gage Height Measurements

Continuous (1-hour maximum interval) streamflow was measured at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and continuous (1-hour maximum interval) gage height (stream stage) was measured at the Upstream ASR site. Streamflow has been measured at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites since May 1995 and November 1993, respectively. Gage height was measured at the Upstream ASR site since April 2011. Streamflow and gage height were measured using standard USGS methods (Sauer and Turnipseed, 2010; Turnipseed and Sauer, 2010; Painter and Loving, 2015).

Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring

Continuous (1-hour maximum interval) water-quality physicochemical properties were measured at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites. Water-quality physicochemical properties measured included water temperature, specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and nitrate plus nitrite. Water-quality monitors were installed near the centroid of the stream cross section at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and on the right streambank (facing downstream) at the Upstream ASR site. The Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were equipped with a YSI Incorporated 6600 Extended Deployment System water-quality monitor (YSI Incorporated, 2012a) in May 1998, April 1998, and April 2011, respectively, to continuously (60-minute interval) measure water temperature, specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen (YSI Clark cell or optical dissolved oxygen sensors), and turbidity (YSI 6026 or 6136 turbidity sensors). Nitrate sensors (HACH Nitratax plus sc; HACH Company, 2014) were installed at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites in February 2017, March 2012, and March 2016, respectively.

Some equipment was upgraded throughout the duration of the project. YSI 6026 turbidity sensors were initially installed at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites in October 1998 and September 1998, respectively. YSI 6136 turbidity sensors were installed at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites in January 2007, July 2004, and April 2011, respectively. A YSI EXO2 water-quality monitor (YSI Incorporated, 2012b) equipped with water temperature, specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen, and YSI EXO turbidity sensors was installed in January 2017 at the Highway 50 site, in September 2014 at the Sedgwick site, and in October 2015 at the Upstream ASR site. YSI 6026 and YSI 6136 turbidity sensors were deployed concurrently at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during July 2004 through August 2005 and July 2004 through January 2006, respectively. YSI 6136 and YSI EXO turbidity sensors were deployed concurrently at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites during January 2017 through May 2019, September 2014 through March 2015 (and again March 2017 through July 2019), and May 2017 through July 2019, respectively, to compare turbidity sensor measurements. Water-quality monitors were maintained following standard USGS procedures (Wagner and others, 2006; Pellerin and others, 2013; Bennett and others, 2014; Rasmussen and others, 2014).

Discrete Water-Quality Data Collection

Discrete surface-water-quality samples were collected at the three study sites across a range of streamflows. Samples were collected using primarily depth- and width-integrated sample collection techniques at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and either single vertical or grab-dip techniques at the Upstream ASR site (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006; Rasmussen and others, 2014). Discrete water-quality constituent datasets used in this report were selected based on the following criteria:

  1. 1. relevance as constituents of concern for either the Equus Beds aquifer or the Little Arkansas River (for example, constituents with Federal or other criteria),

  2. 2. relevance as constituents of concern for water treatment processes (for example, bromide, organic carbon, and pesticides), and

  3. 3. a history of detections in Little Arkansas River water samples (for pesticide datasets; appendix 1.5 in Stone and others, 2019).

Discrete water-quality samples were analyzed for primary ions (hardness, dissolved solids, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bromide, chloride, fluoride, silica, and sulfate), nutrient and carbon species (ammonia plus organic nitrogen, nitrate plus nitrite, total phosphorus, and dissolved and total organic carbon), sediment (suspended solids and suspended-sediment concentration), indicator bacteria (E. coli and fecal coliforms), trace elements (iron and arsenic), pesticides (including deethylatrazine, atrazine, and metolachlor), and absorbance and color at all study sites. Total nitrogen values were computed by summing ammonia plus organic nitrogen and nitrate plus nitrite values. Discrete samples collected at the Sedgwick site included additional nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, orthophosphate, and dissolved phosphorus), strontium, and pesticides (including aminomethylphosphonic acid [AMPA] and glyphosate). Collection and analyses for dissolved and total suspended solids, suspended-sediment concentration, primary ions, nutrients, total organic carbon, arsenic, bacteria, and pesticides followed methods described by Ziegler and Combs (1997), Ziegler and others (1999, 2010), Stone and others (2012, 2016, 2019), Tappa and others (2015), and Stone and Klager (2022). Indicator bacteria analyses were done using methods described by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000a, 2006a, 2006b) and Myers and others (2014). AMPA and glyphosate were analyzed following methods described in Meyer and others (2009).

Primary ions, nutrients, organic carbon, and trace element samples were analyzed by the Wichita Municipal Water and Wastewater Laboratory and the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL; Denver, Colorado). Suspended-sediment concentrations were analyzed at the USGS Iowa Sediment Laboratory (Iowa City, Iowa) following methods described in Guy (1969). Indicator bacteria samples were analyzed by the USGS Kansas Water Science Center (Lawrence, Kans.). Pesticides were analyzed by the USGS NWQL, with the exception of AMPA and glyphosate, which were analyzed by the USGS Kansas Organic Geochemistry Research Laboratory.

Data Analysis

Water-chemistry data were summarized for the Little Arkansas River for the period 1995 through 2021. Surrogate models for water-quality constituents of interest were updated or developed using continuously measured and concomitant discrete data and were used to compute concentrations and loads during the study period. Federal criteria were used to evaluate water quality. Where applicable, water-quality data were compared to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) national drinking-water regulations (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Water-quality trends during the study period also were evaluated.

Continuous and Discrete Water Chemistry Data Analysis

Duration curves were used to summarize continuously measured or select computed Little Arkansas River water-quality data. Duration curves are cumulative distribution functions and were constructed using hourly values to evaluate and compare frequency and magnitude characteristics at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites during the study period. Duration curves are indicative of the percentage of time that specified conditions were equaled or exceeded, or the frequency of exceedance (Searcy, 1959). The Weibull formula (Weibull, 1939; Helsel and others, 2020) was used for plotting position.

Some water-quality constituents had censored values. Summary statistics for constituents that had censored values were calculated using regression on order statistics (Helsel and Cohn, 1988) for datasets with sample sizes less than (<) 50 and having as much as 80 percent censored data and for datasets with sample sizes greater than or equal to 50 and having as much as 50 percent censored data (Helsel, 2005; Bolks and others, 2014). Summary statistics for constituents that had censored values were calculated using maximum likelihood estimation (Helsel and Cohn, 1988) for datasets that had sample sizes greater than or equal to 50 and having between 50 and 80 percent censored data (Helsel, 2005; Bolks and others, 2014). Summary statistics were not computed when greater than 80 percent of data were censored. Statistical summaries were computed using the censtats function in R (version 4.1.3) programming language (R Core Team, 2021).

Surrogate Regression Model Development

Surrogate models were newly developed for constituents of interest at the three study sites and included models for bromide (all sites), dissolved organic carbon (all sites), total organic carbon (Upstream ASR site), 2-chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine (deethylatrazine; all sites), acetochlor (Upstream ASR site), AMPA (Sedgwick site), atrazine (Upstream ASR site), glyphosate (Sedgwick site), and metolachlor (all sites). Surrogate models for atrazine at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were updated from previously published models (Stone and Klager, 2022). Surrogate models were not developed for water-quality constituents of interest that had datasets with greater than 20 percent left-censored data. Additional streamflow-based or gage-height-based models were developed to compute estimates of concentrations or densities during periods when concomitant continuous surrogate measurements were unavailable.

Regression models were developed using ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation for constituents that had datasets without left-censored data (“<” values). Tobit regression methods were used for fitting linear models for constituents that had datasets with left-censored data using absolute maximum likelihood estimation (AMLE; Hald, 1949; Cohen, 1950; Tobin, 1958; Helsel and others, 2020). Discrete datasets containing left-censored data included bromide, deethylatrazine, acetochlor, and metolachlor.

Model datasets and modeled constituents included available concomitant real-time physicochemical properties as explanatory variables during model development. Potential explanatory variables were evaluated individually and in combination and included available concomitant continuously recorded streamflow, water temperature, specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen, YSI EXO turbidity, and nitrate plus nitrite measurements. Periodic functions (seasonal components as sine and cosine variables) also were evaluated as potential explanatory variables using day of the year. Explanatory variables were interpolated within the continuous record based on discrete sample time. The maximum time span between two continuous data points used for interpolation was 2 hours.

Potential linear regression models were evaluated based on diagnostic statistics (coefficient of determination [R2], or adjusted R2 for OLS-estimated models; pseudo-R2 for AMLE-estimated models; Mallow’s Cp (Mallows, 1973) for OLS-estimated models; root mean square error for OLS-estimated models; prediction error sum of squares for OLS-estimated models; and residual standard error for AMLE-estimated models), patterns in residual plots, and the range and distribution of discrete and continuous data (Helsel and others, 2020). Models with the following criteria were selected:

  1. 1. maximized response variable variance explained by the model (R2 or adjusted R2 for OLS-estimated models and pseudo-R2 for AMLE-estimated models),

  2. 2. maximized fit to the data (Mallow’s Cp for OLS-estimated models), and

  3. 3. minimized heteroscedasticity (irregular scatter) in residual plots and uncertainty associated with computed values (root mean square error and prediction error sum of squares for OLS-estimated models and residual standard error for AMLE-estimated models).

If either a sine or a cosine seasonality variable was included in the model, both variables were included in the model. A bias correction factor was calculated for models with logarithmically transformed response variables because transformation of estimates to original units results in a low biased estimate (Duan, 1983; Helsel and others, 2020).

Potential outliers were identified following Rasmussen and others (2009) and Helsel and others (2020). Studentized residuals, leverage, Cook’s D (Cook, 1977), and difference in fit values were used to identify influential data points for OLS-estimated models; and leverage and Cook’s D values were used to identify influential data points for AMLE-estimated models. Studentized residuals were used to identify outliers with high leverage. Cook’s D is a combination of each observation’s leverage and residual value (large values indicate influential observations). Difference in fits is the product of the studentized residual and leverage (large values indicate influential observations). Removing data points that were based only on outlier criteria may overestimate the certainty of the model. Data points that exceeded Cook’s D and difference in fits thresholds for OLS-estimated models and Cook’s D thresholds for AMLE-estimated models were removed from model datasets to avoid erroneous inflation of model-computed values at the upper range of surrogate relations.

Continuous Water-Quality Constituent Concentration and Load Computation

Daily concentrations of selected primary ions (hardness, dissolved solids, calcium, sodium, bromide, chloride, and sulfate), nutrient and carbon species (ammonia plus organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, and total organic carbon), indicator bacteria (E. coli and fecal coliform bacteria), arsenic, sediment (suspended solids and suspended-sediment concentration), and pesticides (deethylatrazine, acetochlor, AMPA, atrazine, glyphosate, and metolachlor) were computed using previously developed (Christensen and others, 2003; Rasmussen and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022) and newly developed models during 1998 through 2021. Daily mean values were used to compute water-quality constituent concentrations because of missing instantaneous streamflow data and periods of missing water-quality data.

Daily concentrations of hardness, dissolved solids, calcium, sodium, chloride, sulfate, and arsenic were computed at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites using surrogate models developed by Stone and Klager (2022). Water-quality constituent models that used turbidity measurements as a surrogate were developed using different turbidity sensors (YSI 6026, YSI 6136, or YSI EXO) and included ammonia plus organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, total organic carbon, E. coli bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, suspended solids, and suspended-sediment concentration. Christensen and others (2003) developed models using continuous YSI 6026 turbidity measurements, Rasmussen and others (2016) developed surrogate relation models using continuous YSI 6136 turbidity measurements, and Stone and Klager (2022) developed surrogate relation models using continuous YSI EXO turbidity measurements at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites. Computed continuous concentrations or densities of ammonia plus organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, E. coli bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, suspended solids, and suspended-sediment concentrations at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were developed using a combination of previously published models by Christensen and others (2003; YSI 6026 turbidity sensor), Rasmussen and others (2016; YSI 6136 turbidity sensor), and Stone and Klager (2022; YSI EXO turbidity sensor) that used continuous turbidity sensor measurements. Computed continuous total organic carbon concentrations at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were developed using a combination of previously published models by Rasmussen and others (2016; YSI 6136 turbidity sensor) and Stone and Klager (2022; YSI EXO turbidity sensor) according to continuous turbidity sensor measurements (Christensen and others [2003] did not include a total organic carbon model). Continuous total organic carbon at the Upstream ASR site was computed using the newly developed surrogate model and continuous YSI EXO turbidity sensor data. Continuous bromide, deethylatrazine, atrazine, and metolachlor concentrations were computed at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites using newly developed models. Continuous acetochlor concentrations were computed for the Upstream ASR site, and continuous AMPA and glyphosate concentrations were computed for the Sedgwick site. Previously published (Stone and Klager, 2022) and newly developed streamflow-based or gage-height-based surrogate models were used to compute continuous water-quality constituent concentrations when continuous water-quality data were unavailable. The streamflow-based or gage-height-based computed constituent concentrations were shifted to the primary water-quality values computed using a surrogate regression model directly preceding and following the streamflow-based or gage-height-based computed concentrations following Porterfield (1972) to align computed concentration differences among model types.

Loads were computed at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites for selected water-quality constituents, including those that have TMDLs. Chloride, nitrate plus nitrite, ammonia plus organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, total organic carbon, suspended solids, suspended-sediment concentration, E. coli bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, and atrazine loads were computed during 1999 (the first full year of water-quality monitor measurements) through 2021. Water-quality constituent loads, with the exception of indicator bacteria, were calculated in tons per day. E. coli and fecal coliform bacteria were calculated in trillions of colony-forming units per day. Loads were computed by multiplying regression model-computed daily concentrations or densities (in milligrams per liter, micrograms per liter, or colony forming units per 100 milliliters) by daily streamflow (cubic feet per second) and a unit conversion factor of 0.0027 (for constituents measured in concentrations of milligrams per liter), 2.7x10−6 (for constituents measured in concentrations of micrograms per liter), or 2.45x10−5 (for constituents measured in densities of colony forming units per 100 milliliters). Annual loads were computed by summing the daily loads. Annual yields (in pounds or trillions of colony-forming units per square mile) were calculated by dividing the annual loads by the contributing drainage area at the Highway 50 (685 mi2) and Sedgwick (1,165 mi2) sites.

Water-Quality Constituent Trends

Water-quality constituent trends were analyzed at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites for discrete datasets that did not have more than 50 percent censored data (Hirsch and De Cicco, 2015) and were not associated with strong seasonality (for example, pesticides [Gilliom, 2007; Ryberg and York, 2020]) and included primary ions (hardness, dissolved solids, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bromide, chloride, fluoride, silica, and sulfate), nutrient and carbon species (ammonia [Sedgwick site only], nitrate plus nitrite, total nitrogen, nitrate [Sedgwick site only], nitrite [Sedgwick site only], orthophosphate [Sedgwick site only], dissolved phosphorus [Sedgwick site only], total phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, and total organic carbon), sediment (suspended solids and suspended-sediment concentration), indicator bacteria (E. coli and fecal coliform bacteria), and trace elements. Water-quality constituent trends were analyzed using the R package Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends (EGRET; Hirsch and De Cicco, 2015). The Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season model (WRTDS; Hirsch and others, 2010; Hirsch and De Cicco, 2015) was run using the EGRET package for long-term flow-normalized water-quality concentration and flux computations and trends. Annual water-quality concentrations and fluxes were estimated using WRTDS with Kalman filtering (WRTDS–K; described in Zhang and Hirsch, 2019). WRTDS–K generally produces more accurate concentration and flux results than the standard WRTDS method (Zhang and Hirsch, 2019). Lee and others (2019) tested 13 methods for computing annual water-quality constituent loads and determined WRTDS–K was the most accurate.

The Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends Confidence Intervals (EGRETci) package was used to quantify WRTDS model uncertainty using a WRTDS bootstrap test (WBT; Hirsch and others, 2015). Hirsch and others (2015) developed WBT trend likelihood descriptive statement definitions (table 2) to provide a method to classify water-quality trends into categories ranging from highly unlikely to highly likely. Water-quality concentrations, flow-normalized concentrations, fluxes, and flow-normalized fluxes were computed annually. Changes in annual flow-normalized concentrations and fluxes were computed at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites for three periods:

  1. 1. the entire 26- or 27-year study period during 1995 (Sedgwick site) or 1996 (Highway 50 site) through 2021,

  2. 2. the 11- or 12-year period before ASR (phase I) operation during 1995 (Sedgwick site) or 1996 (Highway 50 site) through 2006, and

  3. 3. the 15-year period after ASR (phase I) operation onset during 2007 through 2021 (Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites).

Table 2.    

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap test trend likelihood descriptive statement definitions (Hirsch and others, 2015).

[≥, greater than or equal to; ≤, less than or equal to; ˂, less than; ˃, greater than]

Range of posterior mean estimate of increasing trend probability values Upward trend descriptors Downward trend descriptors
≥0.95 and ≤1.0 Highly likely Highly unlikely
≥0.90 and ˂0.95 Very likely Very unlikely
≥0.66 and ˂0.90 Likely Unlikely
˃0.33 and ˂0.66 About as likely as not About as likely as not
˃0.1 and ≤0.33 Unlikely Likely
˃0.05 and ≤0.1 Very unlikely Very likely
≥0 and ≤0.05 Highly unlikely Highly likely
Table 2.    Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap test trend likelihood descriptive statement definitions (Hirsch and others, 2015).

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

OLS regression was analyzed on concurrent YSI 6026/YSI 6136 (Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites) and YSI 6136/YSI EXO (Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites) turbidity sensor measurements for comparisons. The OLS regressions show the relation between the YSI 6026 and YSI 6136 turbidity sensors explained 96 to 97 percent of the variance in turbidity measurements and the relation between the YSI 6136 and YSI EXO turbidity sensors explained 98 to 99 percent of the variance in turbidity measurements (appendix 1). YSI 6136 turbidity sensor measurements were, on average, 46 to 53 percent smaller than YSI 6026 turbidity sensor measurements and 14 to 22 percent larger than YSI EXO turbidity sensor measurements (appendix 2).

Quality-assurance and quality-control (QA/QC) samples were collected to identify, quantify, and document bias and variability in data that may have resulted from collecting, processing, handling, and analyzing samples (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006). QA/QC samples collected for this study included replicate, blank, and standard reference samples for discretely collected water-quality samples. Replicate sample relative percentage difference (RPD) was computed by dividing the difference between replicate pairs by the mean and multiplying that value by 100 for a value that represents the percentage difference between replicate pairs (Zar, 1999). RPDs were not computed for replicate pairs that had consistent nondetections (both values in the replicate pair were censored) or inconsistent detections (one value in the replicate pair was a detected value and the other value was censored; Mueller and others, 2015).

Comparison of field cross-sectional measurements collected during discrete sampling throughout the range of streamflow conditions at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites verified minimal bias in continuous data owing to sensor location within the stream cross section. Median RPDs between continuous in situ and average cross-sectional field water-quality monitor measurements from Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were <4 percent, except for turbidity, which had a median RPDs of 8 percent. Cross-sectional field measurements were not collected at the Upstream ASR site owing to physical site characteristics and safety concerns; instead, the concomitant field measurement was made near the in situ water-quality monitor. Median RPDs between Upstream ASR site continuous in situ and field water-quality monitor measurements were <3 percent, except for turbidity measurements, which had a median RPD of 8 percent.

Continuous data collected during the study period generally required corrections (such as computations to account for instrument fouling or calibration drift) of <10 percent from the original value. Continuous data were missing or deleted because of equipment malfunction, excessive sensor fouling, and extreme low-flow conditions. During the study period, 2 to 4 percent of the streamflow record and 1 percent of the gage height record, 3 to 10 percent of the water temperature record, 5 to 12 percent of the specific conductance record, 3 to 11 percent of the pH record, 6 to 10 percent of the dissolved oxygen and nitrate plus nitrite records, and 6 to 15 percent of the turbidity record were missing or deleted from study sites (table 3).

Table 3.    

Summary statistics for continuously (hourly) measured physicochemical properties for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1995–2021); Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1995–2021); and Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).

[Continuous real-time water-quality data are available on the U.S. Geological Survey National Real-Time Water-Quality website (https://nrtwq.usgs.gov/ks); n, number of measurements; USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; pcode, parameter code; <, less than; --, not applicable]

Site n Minimum Maximum Mean Median Percent missing or deleted data
Highway 50 (streamflow)a 229,998 <1 13,900 217 23 2
Sedgwick (streamflow)b 226,573 <1 19,000 361 56 4
Upstream ASR (gage height)c 93,062 3.5 30 5.8 4.8 1
Highway 50d 199,223 <1 35.2 14.9 15.4 4
Sedgwicke 202,365 <1 35.5 15.2 15.7 3
Upstream ASRf 86,643 <1 36.6 15.8 16.4 10
Highway 50d 196,816 57 2,980 916 921 5
Sedgwicke 195,778 48 1,910 743 763 6
Upstream ASRf 83,251 63 1,910 719 760 12
Highway 50d 197,721 6.1 9.6 -- 8.0 5
Sedgwicke 201,371 6.4 9.2 -- 8.0 3
Upstream ASRf 84,131 6.6 9.3 -- 8.0 11
Highway 50d 194,439 0.3 22.8 9.5 9.0 6
Sedgwickd 197,729 0.1 24.3 9.9 9.5 5
Upstream ASRf 84,446 0.4 21.4 9.3 9.0 10
Highway 50g 191,295 0.3 2,110 89 33 6
Sedgwickh 182,299 0.1 2,010 84 27 11
Upstream ASRi 79,884 1.4 1,280 57 25 15
Highway 50j 40,154 <0.01 8.3 0.9 0.6 6
Sedgwickk 77,627 <0.01 11 1.1 0.9 10
Upstream ASRl 45,764 0.01 6.3 1.1 1.0 10
Table 3.    Summary statistics for continuously (hourly) measured physicochemical properties for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1995–2021); Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1995–2021); and Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).
a

Streamflow data collected during May 1995 through December 2021.

b

Streamflow data collected during January 1995 through December 2021.

c

Gage height data collected during April 2011 through December 2021.

d

Data collected during May 1998 through December 2021.

e

Data collected during April 1998 through December 2021.

f

Data collected during April 2011 through December 2021.

g

Data collected using a YSI 6026 turbidity sensor during October 1998 through December 2006, a YSI 6136 turbidity sensor during January 2007 through January 2017, and an EXO turbidity sensor during February 2017 through December 2021.

h

Data collected using a YSI 6026 turbidity sensor during September 1998 through June 2004, a YSI 6136 turbidity sensor during July 2004 through August 2014, and an EXO turbidity sensor during September 2014 through December 2021.

i

Data collected using a YSI 6136 turbidity sensor during April 2011 through October 2015 and an EXO turbidity sensor during November 2015 through December 2021.

j

Data collected during February 2017 through December 2021.

k

Data collected during March 2012 through December 2021.

l

Data collected during March 2016 through December 2021.

About 10 percent of discrete water-quality samples were QA/QC samples. Sequential, split, and concurrent replicate water-quality samples were collected during the study period over a range of streamflows and gage heights among the sampling sites. Replicate comparisons included 772 primary ion pairs, 520 nutrient and carbon species pairs, 102 sediment pairs, 109 indicator bacteria pairs, 110 trace element pairs, 474 pesticide pairs, and 79 absorbance and color pairs (appendix 3). Median replicate pair RPDs were <5 percent for primary ions and nutrient and carbon species, <10 percent for sediment and absorbance and color, <15 percent for pesticides, and less than or equal to 20 percent for indicator bacteria and trace elements (appendix 3). The RPD values generally were largest when the values were at or near the laboratory reporting level.

Blank samples were collected to measure the magnitude of contaminant concentration introduced into samples during sampling, processing, and analytical procedures (U.S. Geological Survey, 2006). Blank samples consisted of deionized water, inorganic blank water, or pesticide-grade blank water depending on analysis type. During 1995 through 2021, 142 blank samples were collected for this study. Primary ion blank detections were in 5 percent of primary ion blank results and all individual primary ions detections were <10 percent (appendix 3); detections were generally at or near the detection limit. Nutrients and carbon were detected in 9 percent of blank samples and were generally at or near the detection limit. Individual nutrient and carbon detections were <10 percent, except for ammonia (16 percent), nitrate plus nitrite (17 percent), dissolved organic carbon (47 percent), and total organic carbon (30 percent; appendix 3). Generally, dissolved and total organic carbon detections were at or near the detection limit; some organic carbon detections were traced to potentially contaminated blank water used for the samples. Indicator bacteria were not detected, and one trace element (iron) was detected in 1 percent of blank samples (appendix 3). Pesticides were detected in 1 percent of blank samples and detections were at or near the detection limit (appendix 3). Absorbance and color samples had four (6 percent) detections that were at or near the detection limit (appendix 3).

Little Arkansas River Long-Term Water Quality

Continuous measurement of physicochemical properties in near-real time allowed characterization of Little Arkansas River water during conditions and time scales that would not have been possible otherwise and served as a complement to discrete water-quality sampling. Continued data collection during different flow and seasonal conditions can be used to characterize water-quality conditions and potentially identify new and changing trends. Surface-water physicochemical properties and water-quality constituents that frequently exceeded EPA Federal drinking water-quality criteria and those that are of potential interest or concern for artificial recharge operations are discussed in this report to characterize the quality of potential recharge water.

Little Arkansas River Continuous Streamflow

Stream ecosystem structure and function are largely affected by streamflow (Allan and others, 2021). Annual differences in streamflow are primarily attributed to differences in precipitation. The Equus Beds ASR project operations are limited to above-base-flow conditions. Streamflow at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites ranged from <1 to 13,900 ft3/s and <1 to 19,000 ft3/s, respectively, during 1995 through 2021 (table 3). Mean streamflows during the study period were 217 and 361 ft3/s at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, respectively (table 3). The ASR phase II water treatment facility requires a minimum streamflow of about 100 ft3/s at the Sedgwick site to operate. During the study period, 100 ft3/s was exceeded about 31 percent of the time (fig. 2A). Little Arkansas River streamflow values during 1995 through 2021 at the Sedgwick site did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022; table 3). Streamflow and gage height maxima were during May 2019 at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites.

Duration curves showing the frequency of exceedance versus measurements and relevant
                        benchmarks for Little Arkansas River study sites in Kansas.
Figure 2.

Duration curves for continuously (hourly) measured physicochemical properties for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1995–2021); Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1995–2021); and Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21). A, Streamflow or gage height. B, Water temperature. C, Specific conductance. D, pH. E, Dissolved oxygen. F, Turbidity. G, Nitrate plus nitrite.

Little Arkansas River Continuous Water Quality

Water temperature affects physical, chemical, and biological processes. Kansas water-quality criteria require that discharges to streams not change water temperature more than 3 degrees Celsius (°C) above or below natural conditions or raise the water temperature above 32 °C (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2018). Mean study period water temperatures at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were 14.9 °C, 15.2 °C, and 15.8 °C, respectively (table 3). Water temperatures at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites exceeded 32 °C <1 percent of the time (fig. 2B).

Specific conductance is an indirect measure of dissolved solids in water (Hem, 1992). Specific conductance measurements are commonly used as surrogates for primary ions at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites (Christensen and others, 2003; Rasmussen and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022). Mean Little Arkansas River specific conductance was 916, 743, and 719 microsiemens per centimeter at 25 °C (µS/cm at 25 °C) during the study period at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively (table 3). Minimum continuous specific conductance at the Upstream ASR site was in May 2016 and was about 20 µS/cm at 25 °C less than previously reported by Stone and others (2016; table 3). Specific conductance was between about 500 and 1,000 µS/cm at 25 °C during most of the study period at all three study sites and varied more at the Highway 50 site (fig. 2C).

pH is a measure of the effective hydrogen ion concentration and is useful to evaluate chemical and biological reactions in water (Hem, 1992; U.S. Geological Survey, 2021). Kansas aquatic life-support criteria require that pH in streams measure between 6.5 and 8.5 standard units (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2018). The 2010 through 2014, 2015 through 2019, and current (2020 through 2025) NPDES permits (Kansas permit number: I-LA24-PO01; Federal permit number: KS0099694) for the ASR phase II treatment facility state that the effluent limits for pH are 6.0 to 9.0 standard units. Little Arkansas River median pH during the study period was 8.0 for all three study sites (table 3). pH was below the Kansas aquatic life-support criterion of 6.5 <1 percent of the time at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and was above the 8.5 criterion 3 percent of the time at all three study sites during the study period (fig. 2D).

Dissolved oxygen is important for the survival and growth of aquatic organisms and is used as an indicator of stream health; concentrations of dissolved oxygen in surface water primarily are related to photosynthesis, respiration, atmospheric reaeration, and water temperature (U.S. Geological Survey, 2020). Kansas aquatic life-support criteria require that dissolved oxygen concentrations are not <5.0 mg/L (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2018). Little Arkansas River mean dissolved oxygen concentrations during the study period were 9.5, 9.9, and 9.3 mg/L at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively (table 3). Dissolved oxygen concentrations were below the Kansas aquatic life-support criterion of 5.0 mg/L about 3 to 4 percent of the time at the study sites during 1995 through 2021 (fig. 2E). Minimum dissolved oxygen measurements at the Upstream ASR site were 1 mg/L less than previously reported (Stone and others, 2016) and were during June and July 2016.

Turbidity is caused by suspended and dissolved matter such as clay, silt, dissolved organic material, plankton and other microscopic organisms, organic acids, and dyes. Turbidity measurements are commonly used as surrogates for unfiltered nutrient and carbon species, sediment, and bacteria at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites (Christensen and others, 2003; Rasmussen and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022). EPA guidelines for turbidity (based on reference conditions that are determined as the 25th percentiles of all compiled nutrient data for that ecoregion) list 22.13 nephelometric turbidity units (a reporting unit equivalent to formazin nephelometric units [Anderson, 2005]) as the criterion for level III ecoregion 27 (central Great Plains) streams, which includes the Little Arkansas River (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001a). Mean Little Arkansas River turbidity measurements during the study period at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were 89, 84, and 57 formazin nephelometric units (FNUs), respectively (table 3). The EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline of 22.13 nephelometric turbidity units (presented here as a benchmark for comparison because of relative differences in turbidity sensor measurements) was exceeded about 63, 56, and 54 percent of the time at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively, during the study period (fig. 2F).

Large concentrations of inorganic nitrogen compounds, such as nitrate plus nitrite, may be toxic to aquatic organisms. Large nitrate concentrations in drinking water can impair the oxygen-carrying capacity of hemoglobin in humans (Camargo and Alonso, 2006). The EPA guidelines for nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen list 0.19 mg/L as the criterion for level III ecoregion 27 streams (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001a). The EPA Federal MCL for nitrate in drinking water is 10 mg/L as nitrogen, which is the concentration above which methemoglobinemia, or blue baby syndrome, may happen in infants (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Mean Little Arkansas River nitrate plus nitrite measurements at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were 0.9, 1.1, and 1.1 mg/L, respectively (table 3). The EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline of 0.19 mg/L was exceeded at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites 84, 96, and 99 percent of the time, respectively, during the study period (fig. 2G). The EPA nitrate MCL of 10 mg/L was not exceeded at the Highway 50 and Upstream ASR sites and was exceeded <1 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site (table 3, fig. 2G). Continuous nitrate plus nitrite measurements at the Highway 50 site exceeded the range previously reported (Stone and Klager, 2022) by 2.6 mg/L (table 3) and were during February 2021. Continuous nitrate plus nitrite concentrations at the Upstream ASR site have not been previously reported. Maximum nitrate plus nitrite concentrations were during February 2021 and minimum nitrate plus nitrite concentrations were during August 2016 at all three study sites.

All Little Arkansas River continuously measured water-quality constituents at the Sedgwick site fell within historic extremes. Little Arkansas River water temperature and pH values at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites during this study did not exceed ranges previously reported (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022; table 3). Little Arkansas River specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity values did not exceed ranges previously reported at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022; table 3). Minimum continuous specific conductance and dissolved oxygen values at the Upstream ASR site were less than previously reported by Stone and others (2016; table 3) and maximum nitrate plus nitrate values at the Highway 50 site exceeded the range previously reported (Stone and Klager, 2022).

Little Arkansas River Discrete Water Quality

Discrete stream-water samples were used to describe Little Arkansas River water-quality conditions during 1995 through 2021. Water-quality constituents that frequently exceeded EPA drinking water-quality criteria and those that are of potential interest or concern for ASR operations are discussed in this section of the report to characterize source water for Equus Beds ASR efforts. Select Little Arkansas River discrete water-quality datasets at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were used with concomitant continuously measured physicochemical parameters to develop new surrogate relations. In addition, select Little Arkansas River discrete water-quality datasets for the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were used to evaluate water-quality trends during 1995 through 2021.

Ions

Primary dissolved ions come from decomposing rocks and soils and generally include calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, carbonate, chloride, and sulfate ions (Hem, 1992). Primary ions are a constituent of concern in drinking water because large concentrations of ions may cause physiological effects, unpalatable mineral tastes, and greater costs owing to corrosion or additional treatment needs (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). The EPA established National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations that set nonmandatory water-quality standards. The EPA does not enforce SMCLs because they were established as guidelines to assist public water-supply systems in managing their drinking water for aesthetic considerations such as taste, color, and odor (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Several primary ions have EPA SMCLs and include dissolved solids, chloride, fluoride, and sulfate (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009).

The EPA dissolved solids SMCL is 500 mg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009), and discrete samples exceeded the SMCL at all three study sites (table 4). Dissolved solids concentrations exceeded the SMCL in 45, 29, and 23 percent of samples at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. Mean dissolved solids concentrations during the study period ranged from 344 mg/L at the Upstream ASR site to 463 mg/L at the Highway 50 site (table 4). Dissolved solids ranges at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites did not exceed the ranges previously reported (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022; table 4). The dissolved solids minimum at the Upstream ASR site was 26 percent less than the minimum previously reported (Stone and others, 2016) and were in May 2019 (table 4).

Table 4.    

Discrete sample water-quality constituent summary statistics for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; USGS station 07143672, 1995–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1995–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).

[Summary statistics were not computed when more than 80 percent of data were censored; USGS; U.S. Geological Survey; n, number of measurements; µg/L QSE, microgram per liter as quinine sulfate equivalents; CaCO3, calcium carbonate; <, less than; --, not applicable; SiO2, silicon dioxide; E. coli, Escherichia coli; UV, ultraviolet; nm, nanometer; absorbance units/cm, absorbance units per centimeter]

Water-quality constituent USGS parameter code Percent censored data n Minimum Maximum Mean Median Standard deviation Standard error Coefficient of variation First quartile Third quartile
Streamflow, in cubic feet per second 00061 0 378 0.10 10,500 737 69.0 1,566 80.5 2.1 20.7 582
pH, in standard units 00400 0 312 6.2 8.7 7.6 7.6 0.4 0.02 0.05 7.3 7.9
Specific conductance, in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius 00095 0 312 64 3,550 764 678 512 29.0 0.7 297 1,116
Water temperature, in degrees Celsius 00010 0 312 0.0 27.9 15.0 16.7 8.05 0.46 0.54 7.2 22.2
Dissolved oxygen, in milligrams per liter 00300 0 307 2.5 16.2 8.0 7.6 2.7 0.16 0.3 5.9 10.0
Turbidity, in formazin nephelometric units 63680 0 238 3 1,610 242 120 301 19.5 1.24 28.9 332
Streamflow, in cubic feet per second 00061 0 528 1.40 16,100 1,083.0 95.8 2,470 107.0 2.3 33.9 560
pH, in standard units 00400 0 426 6.0 8.6 7.7 7.8 0.4 0.02 0.05 7.5 8.0
Specific conductance, in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius 00095 0 437 54 1,419 619 681 317 15.2 0.5 303 857
Water temperature, in degrees Celsius 00010 0 423 -0.2 28.4 15.9 17.3 8.20 0.40 0.51 8.8 23.5
Dissolved oxygen, in milligrams per liter 00300 0 422 0.8 15.0 8.1 7.4 2.7 0.13 0.3 6.0 10.2
Turbidity, in formazin nephelometric units 63680 0 384 3 2,090 155 55.0 252 12.8 1.62 20.0 169
pH, in standard units 00400 0 96 6.9 8.8 7.8 7.9 0.4 0.04 0.05 7.5 8.0
Specific conductance, in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius 00095 0 96 83 1,293 582 641 305 31.1 0.5 274 794
Water temperature, in degrees Celsius 00010 0 96 0.2 27.4 17.7 19.6 7.60 0.78 0.43 11.8 24.3
Dissolved oxygen, in milligrams per liter 00300 0 96 1.1 17.7 7.4 6.9 3.0 0.30 0.4 5.5 9.0
Turbidity, in formazin nephelometric units 63680 0 95 5 582 127 67.6 138 14.2 1.09 23.0 182
Hardness, milligrams per liter as CaCO3 00900 0 278 21 584 231 232 144 8.6 0.62 90 350
Dissolved solids, in milligrams per liter 70300 0 278 66 1,960 463 441 289 17 0.62 192 679
Calcium, in milligrams per liter 00915 0 278 6.5 174 73 73 46 2.7 0.63 27 111
Magnesium, in milligrams per liter 00925 0 278 1.2 36 12 11 7.4 0.44 0.62 4.8 18
Potassium, in milligrams per liter 00935 0 278 3.3 18 7.8 7.9 2.2 0.13 0.28 6.3 9.3
Sodium, in milligrams per liter 00930 0 278 2.1 498 69 57 59 3.5 0.85 20 108
Bromide, in milligrams per liter 71870 4 203 <0.02 1.7 0.32 0.18 0.33 0.02 1.0 0.09 0.46
Chloride, in milligrams per liter 00940 <1 279 <5 932 129 99 115 -- -- 34 195
Fluoride, in milligrams per liter 00950 <1 206 <0.02 2.7 0.26 0.24 0.19 -- -- 0.19 0.29
Silica, in milligrams per liter as SiO2 00955 0 203 5.2 24 14 14 4.2 0.29 0.30 11 17
Sulfate, in milligrams per liter 00945 4 278 <5 312 35 32 28 -- -- 14 52
Hardness, milligrams per liter as CaCO3 00900 0 386 16 487 216 246 109 5.5 0.50 102 303
Dissolved solids, in milligrams per liter 70300 0 385 65 839 384 422 179.9 9.2 0.46 208 521
Calcium, in milligrams per liter 00915 0 386 4.7 138 66 75 33 1.7 0.50 31 93
Magnesium, in milligrams per liter 00925 0 386 1.0 35 12 14 6.2 0.31 0.51 5.7 17
Potassium, in milligrams per liter 00935 <1 386 3.7 15 6.9 6.8 1.9 -- -- 5.5 8.1
Sodium, in milligrams per liter 00930 0 386 1.5 132 47 48 30 1.5 0.63 20 65
Bromide, in milligrams per liter 71870 6 220 <0.02 0.98 0.18 0.13 0.15 -- -- 0.06 0.24
Chloride, in milligrams per liter 00940 1 392 <5 315 67 57 52 -- -- 29 93
Fluoride, in milligrams per liter 00950 0 350 0.10 0.82 0.29 0.28 0.09 0.01 0.32 0.22 0.33
Silica, in milligrams per liter as SiO2 00955 0 340 3.1 24 14 14 3.9 0.21 0.27 11 17
Sulfate, in milligrams per liter 00945 3 392 <5 211 45 50 27 -- -- 19 65
Hardness, milligrams per liter as CaCO3 00900 0 64 30 367 189 199 108 13 0.57 80 288
Dissolved solids, in milligrams per liter 70300 0 64 60 735 344 371 183 23 0.53 160 484
Calcium, in milligrams per liter 00915 0 64 9.2 114 58 58 33 4.2 0.58 25 89
Magnesium, in milligrams per liter 00925 0 64 1.7 21 10 11 5.9 0.74 0.57 4.6 16
Potassium, in milligrams per liter 00935 0 64 4.2 14 7.7 7.7 2.2 0.27 0.28 5.7 9.3
Sodium, in milligrams per liter 00930 0 64 2.5 134 42 43 31 3.9 0.74 12 58
Bromide, in milligrams per liter 71870 5 64 <0.04 0.58 0.17 0.15 0.13 -- -- 0.06 0.25
Chloride, in milligrams per liter 00940 0 64 4.2 242 61 48 52 6.5 0.85 16 86
Fluoride, in milligrams per liter 00950 0 64 0.10 0.61 0.30 0.27 0.11 0.01 0.38 0.23 0.36
Silica, in milligrams per liter as SiO2 00955 0 64 6.6 24 14 15 4.3 0.53 0.30 12 17
Sulfate, in milligrams per liter 00945 4 3 <5 88 37 34 24 3.1 0.66 14 60
Ammonia plus organic nitrogen, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00625 0 188 0.27 9.0 1.8 1.5 1.4 0.10 0.78 0.76 2.3
Nitrate plus nitrite, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00631 15 274 <0.02 5.4 0.87 0.71 0.94 -- -- 0.13 1.2
Total nitrogen, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00625+00631 22 188 0.29 11 2.7 2.2 2.1 -- -- 0.98 0.37
Total phosphorus, in milligrams per liter as phosphorus 00665 0 189 0.14 3.1 0.70 0.61 0.44 0.03 0.63 0.39 0.88
Dissolved organic carbon, in milligrams per liter 00681 0 86 2.4 17 7.9 7.8 3.9 0.42 0.49 4.2 10
Total organic carbon, in milligrams per liter 00680 0 160 2.8 52 13 11 8.7 0.69 0.67 6.8 17
Ammonia, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00608 24 368 <0.01 0.86 0.09 0.05 0.12 -- -- 0.02 0.11
Ammonia plus organic nitrogen, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00625 0 332 0.26 6.1 1.4 1.1 0.94 0.05 0.65 0.76 1.9
Nitrate plus nitrite, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00631 3 400 <0.02 12 1.2 0.91 1.2 -- -- 0.45 1.5
Total nitrogen, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00625+00631 3 331 0.52 11 2.5 2.1 1.6 -- -- 1.3 3.1
Nitrate, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00618 3 334 <0.01 9.4 1.0 0.83 1.0 -- -- 0.40 1.3
Nitrite, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00613 18 335 <0.001 1.5 0.04 0.02 0.10 -- -- 0.01 0.05
Orthophosphate, in milligrams per liter as phosphorus 00671 0 335 0.04 1.6 0.42 0.39 0.19 0.01 0.47 0.29 0.50
Dissolved phosphorus, in milligrams per liter as phosphorus 00666 0 368 0.06 2.0 0.41 0.39 0.20 0.01 0.48 0.30 0.50
Total phosphorus, in milligrams per liter as phosphorus 00665 0 335 0.07 2.1 0.70 0.67 0.30 0.02 0.43 0.49 0.85
Dissolved organic carbon, in milligrams per liter 00681 <1 258 <0.23 16 6.6 5.9 3.2 -- -- 4.0 8.4
Total organic carbon, in milligrams per liter 00680 0 175 0.59 36 12 11 7.2 0.54 0.59 5.8 17
Ammonia plus organic nitrogen, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00625 0 64 0.37 4.0 1.7 1.5 0.87 0.11 0.53 0.94 2.1
Nitrate plus nitrite, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00631 3 94 <0.02 4.8 1.1 0.82 1.0 -- -- 0.39 1.5
Total nitrogen, in milligrams per liter as nitrogen 00625+00631 3 64 0.61 7.7 2.7 2.2 1.6 -- -- 1.5 3.5
Total phosphorus, in milligrams per liter as phosphorus 00665 0 64 0.29 1.5 0.80 0.78 0.26 0.03 0.33 0.65 0.93
Dissolved organic carbon, in milligrams per liter 00681 0 85 2.9 14 7.7 6.9 3.5 0.38 0.45 4.5 11
Total organic carbon, in milligrams per liter 00680 0 84 3.5 28 12 11 6.2 0.67 0.53 6.3 15
Suspended solids, in milligrams per liter 00530 6 242 <4 2,790 264 96 417 -- -- 43 302
Suspended-sediment concentration, in milligrams per liter 80154 0 196 4.0 3,270 400 190 559 40 1.4 64 485
Suspended solids, in milligrams per liter 00530 5 296 <4 1,670 219 91 285 -- -- 33 282
Suspended-sediment concentration, in milligrams per liter 80154 0 339 2.0 1,870 232 82 327 18 1.4 35 290
Suspended solids, in milligrams per liter 00530 2 64 <15 885 184 102 206 -- -- 53 234
Suspended-sediment concentration, in milligrams per liter 80154 0 62 18 1,430 246 138 298 38 1.2 60 298
E. coli, in colony forming units per 100 milliliters 90902 2 169 <1 26,000 2,000 640 3,700 -- -- 190 2,200
Fecal coliforms, in colony forming units per 100 milliliters 31625 3 269 <20 3,000,000 14,000 590 180,000 -- -- 170 2,400
E. coli, in colony forming units per 100 milliliters 90902 2 184 1 47,000 3,400 610 7,400 -- -- 80 3,300
Fecal coliforms, in colony forming units per 100 milliliters 31625 3 258 <1 10,000 4,500 600 11,000 -- -- 100 3,400
E. coli, in colony forming units per 100 milliliters 90902 2 55 8 30,000 2,500 540 5,100 -- -- 100 2,000
Fecal coliforms, in colony forming units per 100 milliliters 31625 5 63 18 34,000 3,300 910 6,400 -- -- 180 2,600
Iron, in micrograms per liter 01046 50 278 <5 864 63 25 109 -- -- 5.6 50
Arsenic, in micrograms per liter 01000 2 200 <1 16 5.4 4.8 3.0 -- -- 3.1 6.6
Iron, in micrograms per liter 01046 34 386 <4 621 78 31 120 -- -- 11 54
Strontium, in micrograms per liter 01080 0 273 53 1,278 455 515 237 14 0.52 222 632
Arsenic, in micrograms per liter 01000 1 339 <1 16 5.8 5.1 2.8 -- -- 3.7 7.6
Iron, in micrograms per liter 01046 42 64 <5 1,137 137 50 167 -- -- 50 209
Arsenic, in micrograms per liter 01000 0 63 1.5 27 7.7 5.9 5.2 0.66 0.68 3.9 9.6
2-Chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine (deethylatrazine), in micrograms per liter 04040 11 227 <0.006 2.69 0.350 0.166 0.460 -- -- 0.048 0.495
2-Ethyl-6-methylaniline, in micrograms per liter 61620 97 86 <0.005 0.014 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3,4-Dichloroaniline, in micrograms per liter 61625 83 86 <0.004 0.127 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
4-Chloro-2-methylphenol, in micrograms per liter 61633 84 86 <0.003 0.031 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Acetochlor, in micrograms per liter 49260 55 233 <0.002 8.68 0.321 0.025 0.940 -- -- 0.020 0.139
Alachlor, in micrograms per liter 46342 67 233 <0.002 28.0 0.260 0.025 1.890 0.124 7.25 0.004 0.027
Atrazine, in micrograms per liter 39632 1 216 <0.05 46.2 3.89 1.31 6.23 -- -- 0.210 5.09
Carbofuran, in micrograms per liter 82674 83 63 <0.003 0.930 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Cyanazine, in micrograms per liter 04041 96 183 <0.004 0.340 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Desulfinylfipronil amide, in micrograms per liter 62169 93 86 <0.003 <0.086 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Desulfinylfipronil, in micrograms per liter 62170 66 86 <0.004 0.014 0.006 0.006 0.002 -- -- 0.005 0.006
Fipronil sulfide, in micrograms per liter 62167 87 86 <0.004 <0.008 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Hexazinone, in micrograms per liter 04025 96 84 <0.008 0.295 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Metolachlor, in micrograms per liter 39415 12 233 <0.014 39.4 2.08 0.530 3.75 -- -- 0.070 2.50
Metribuzin, in micrograms per liter 82630 75 201 <0.004 0.770 0.042 0.025 0.086 -- -- 0.008 0.025
Prometon, in micrograms per liter 04037 58 227 <0.006 0.320 0.026 0.025 0.030 -- -- 0.010 0.025
Prometryn, in micrograms per liter 04036 98 186 <0.005 0.120 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Simazine, in micrograms per liter 04035 70 227 <0.005 1.59 0.027 0.025 0.106 -- -- 0.005 0.025
Tebuthiuron, in micrograms per liter 82670 72 118 <0.01 0.243 0.026 0.014 0.034 -- -- 0.012 0.025
2,6-Diethylaniline, in micrograms per liter 82660 99 135 <0.002 <0.004 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2-Chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine (deethylatrazine), in micrograms per liter 04040 6 263 <0.006 2.40 0.394 0.215 0.469 -- -- 0.065 0.530
2-Ethyl-6-methylaniline, in micrograms per liter 61620 96 115 <0.005 0.010 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3,4-Dichloroaniline, in micrograms per liter 61625 63 115 <0.004 0.480 0.014 0.004 0.053 -- -- 0.003 0.007
4-Chloro-2-methylphenol,in micrograms per liter 61633 79 115 <0.003 0.045 0.006 0.004 0.006 -- -- 0.003 0.008
Acetochlor, in micrograms per liter 49260 53 268 <0.002 17.9 0.380 0.025 1.40 -- -- 0.025 0.145
Alachlor, in micrograms per liter 46342 57 268 <0.002 3.50 0.127 0.025 0.387 -- -- 0.004 0.050
Aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), in micrograms per liter 62649 0 140 0.290 4.30 1.44 1.40 0.742 0.063 0.516 0.798 2.00
Atrazine, in micrograms per liter 39632 2 247 <0.025 31.0 3.55 1.25 5.42 -- -- 0.269 4.51
Carbofuran, in micrograms per liter 82674 86 51 <0.003 0.191 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Cyanazine, in micrograms per liter 04041 96 187 <0.004 0.260 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Desulfinylfipronil amide, in micrograms per liter 62169 94 115 <0.004 <0.086 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Desulfinylfipronil, in micrograms per liter 62170 37 115 <0.003 0.010 0.006 0.006 0.002 -- -- 0.004 0.006
Fipronil sulfide, in micrograms per liter 62167 71 115 <0.002 0.010 0.006 0.006 0.002 -- -- 0.006 0.008
Glyphosate, in micrograms per liter 62722 0 141 0.050 7.80 0.970 0.560 1.24 0.104 1.28 0.240 1.20
Hexazinone, in micrograms per liter 04025 92 114 <0.008 <0.088 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Metolachlor, in micrograms per liter 39415 7 268 <0.016 15.9 1.77 0.480 2.70 -- -- 0.080 2.44
Metribuzin, in micrograms per liter 82630 78 233 <0.004 0.439 0.032 0.025 0.051 -- -- 0.006 0.025
Prometon, in micrograms per liter 04037 51 263 <0.012 0.460 0.026 0.021 0.038 -- -- 0.010 0.025
Prometryn, in micrograms per liter 04036 98 220 <0.005 <0.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Simazine, in micrograms per liter 04035 65 263 <0.005 0.370 0.024 0.024 0.033 -- -- 0.007 0.025
Tebuthiuron, in micrograms per liter 82670 79 135 <0.01 0.597 0.030 0.014 0.072 -- -- 0.014 0.014
2,6-Diethylaniline, in micrograms per liter 82660 98 54 <0.006 <0.008 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2-Chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine (deethylatrazine), in micrograms per liter 04040 0 54 0.014 1.52 0.297 0.177 0.325 0.044 1.09 0.071 0.396
2-Ethyl-6-methylaniline, in micrograms per liter 61620 89 54 <0.01 0.011 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
3,4-Dichloroaniline, in micrograms per liter 61625 57 54 <0.006 0.033 0.008 0.004 0.007 -- -- 0.004 0.010
4-Chloro-2-methylphenol, in micrograms per liter 61633 76 54 <0.005 0.021 0.006 0.006 0.004 -- -- 0.004 0.008
Acetochlor, in micrograms per liter 49260 9 54 <0.01 10.5 0.982 0.202 1.98 -- -- 0.025 0.763
Alachlor, in micrograms per liter 46342 80 54 <0.008 0.063 0.008 0.004 0.010 -- -- 0.004 0.004
Atrazine, in micrograms per liter 39632 0 54 0.044 19.1 3.47 1.50 4.68 0.64 1.35 0.294 5.02
Desulfinylfipronil amide, in micrograms per liter 62169 94 54 <0.086 <0.086 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Desulfinylfipronil, in micrograms per liter 62170 31 54 <0.012 0.010 0.006 0.006 0.002 -- -- 0.005 0.006
Fipronil sulfide, in micrograms per liter 62167 56 54 <0.012 <0.016 0.006 0.006 0.002 -- -- 0.004 0.008
Hexazinone, in micrograms per liter 04025 70 54 <0.008 0.035 0.008 0.006 0.006 -- -- 0.006 0.006
Metolachlor, in micrograms per liter 39415 0 54 0.019 12.1 1.77 0.464 2.78 0.379 1.58 0.096 2.65
Metribuzin, in micrograms per liter 82630 67 54 <0.008 0.486 0.044 0.010 0.086 -- -- 0.006 0.041
Prometon, in micrograms per liter 04037 19 54 <0.012 0.105 0.014 0.010 0.014 -- -- 0.007 0.015
Prometryn, in micrograms per liter 04036 96 54 <0.006 <0.01 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Simazine, in micrograms per liter 04035 54 54 <0.006 0.067 0.013 0.006 0.014 -- -- 0.0037 0.014
Tebuthiuron, in micrograms per liter 82670 83 54 <0.01 <0.16 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
UV absorbance at 254 nm, in absorbance units/cm 50624 0 67 0.06 1.08 0.42 0.31 0.31 0.04 0.74 0.13 0.68
UV organic constituent absorbance at 280 nm, in absorbance units/cm 61726 0 67 0.04 0.85 0.33 0.24 0.25 0.03 0.76 0.10 0.54
Color, in platinum cobalt units 00080 0 61 10 300 109 75 90 12 0.8 30 200
UV absorbance at 254 nm, in absorbance units/cm 50624 0 196 0.03 1.09 0.28 0.18 0.23 0.02 0.82 0.10 0.41
UV organic constituent absorbance at 280 nm, in absorbance units/cm 61726 0 196 0.02 0.86 0.22 0.14 0.19 0.01 0.84 0.07 0.32
Color, in platinum cobalt units 00080 0 96 15 400 107 75 92 9 0.9 30 175
UV absorbance at 254 nm, in absorbance units/cm 50624 0 85 0.07 1.09 0.38 0.28 0.27 0.03 0.71 0.13 0.64
UV organic constituent absorbance at 280 nm, in absorbance units/cm 61726 0 85 0.05 0.86 0.30 0.21 0.22 0.02 0.73 0.10 0.50
Color, in platinum cobalt units 00080 0 84 15 350 97 55 84 9 0.9 30 150
Table 4.    Discrete sample water-quality constituent summary statistics for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; USGS station 07143672, 1995–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1995–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).

Bromide is a constituent of concern for the Little Arkansas River. Bromide is not a risk to human health; however, during drinking-water decontamination, bromide reacts with natural organic matter present in source water and chemical disinfectants to create brominated disinfection byproducts, including bromate. The EPA has classified bromate (Federal MCL of 0.01 mg/L) as a probable human carcinogen (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Bromate is formed when ozone used to disinfect drinking water reacts with naturally occurring bromide in source water (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001b). The city of Wichita uses a threshold of 0.3 mg/L for bromide as a treatment standard. Bromide concentrations exceeded the treatment threshold of 0.3 mg/L at all three study sites (table 4). Bromide concentrations exceeded the treatment threshold in 38, 19, and 17 percent of samples at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. Mean bromide concentrations at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites during the study period were 0.32, 0.18, and 0.17 mg/L, respectively (table 4). Bromide ranges at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites did not exceed the ranges previously reported (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2019; table 4).

The EPA SMCL for chloride and sulfate is 250 mg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Mean chloride concentrations during the study period at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were 129, 67, and 61 mg/L, respectively (table 4). Little Arkansas River chloride concentrations exceeded the Federal SMCL at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, but the SMCL was not exceeded at the Upstream ASR site during the study (table 4). Chloride concentrations exceeded the SMCL in 14 and <1 percent of samples at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, respectively. Sulfate concentrations exceeded the Federal SMCL at the Highway 50 site in <1 percent of samples but not the Sedgwick or Upstream ASR sites during the study (table 4). Chloride concentration ranges during this study at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022). The chloride minimum at the Upstream ASR site was less than the range previously reported (Stone and others, 2016) and were in May 2019 (table 4). Sulfate concentration ranges at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites did not exceed the previously reported range (Tappa and others, 2015). The sulfate minimum at the Upstream ASR site was less than the range previously reported (Stone and others, 2016) and were in May 2019 (table 4).

Nutrients and Carbon Species

Nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus species, in water are closely related to agricultural activities because of their presence in fertilizers and animal waste. Nutrients are a pollutant of concern in the Little Arkansas River (Kansas State University Research and Extension and others, 2018). Nitrogen is present as ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, and as part of organic compounds. The EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline for ammonia plus organic nitrogen (organic nitrogen; as nitrogen) is 0.52 mg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001a) and was exceeded at all study sites (table 4). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations exceeded the guideline in 92, 90, and 98 percent of samples at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. During the study period, mean ammonia plus organic nitrogen (as nitrogen) concentrations ranged from 1.4 mg/L (Sedgwick site) to 1.8 mg/L (Highway 50 site; table 4). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen values at the Highway 50 site did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen values at the Sedgwick and Upstream ASR sites exceeded previously reported ranges (Stone and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022; table 4) by 3 and 18 percent, respectively, and maximum values at both sites were in February 2020. Mean nitrate plus nitrite (as nitrogen) concentrations ranged from 0.87 mg/L (Highway 50 site) to 1.2 mg/L (Sedgwick site; table 4). Nitrate plus nitrite values during the study period at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022), but the Upstream ASR site minimum did (Stone and others, 2016; table 4) in May 2019.

The EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline for total phosphorus of 0.09 mg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001a) was exceeded in all samples at all three study sites with the exception of one sample at the Sedgwick site (table 4). Discrete sample total phosphorus (as phosphorus) means were 0.70 at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and 0.80 mg/L at the Upstream ASR site for the study period (table 4). Total phosphorus values did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022) at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, but did exceed previously reported minimum and maximum values (Stone and others, 2016) by 0.20 and 0.04 mg/L, respectively, at the Upstream ASR site (table 4). The minimum total phosphorus value (0.29 mg/L) at the Upstream ASR site was in December 2019 and the maximum (1.5 mg/L) was in May 2021.

An important artificial recharge concern is the introduction of potentially reactive organic material into an aquifer (Aiken, 2002). Mean dissolved organic carbon concentrations were 7.9, 6.6, and 7.7 mg/L at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR study sites, respectively, during the study period (table 4). Dissolved organic carbon values did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2019) at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, but did exceed previously reported minimum and maximum values (Stone and others, 2016) by 0.80 and 0.70 mg/L, respectively, at the Upstream ASR site (table 4). The minimum dissolved organic carbon value (2.9 mg/L) was in January 2018 and the maximum (14 mg/L) was in June 2016 at the Upstream ASR site. Mean total organic carbon concentrations were 13 mg/L at the Highway 50 site and 12 mg/L at the Sedgwick and Upstream ASR sites (table 4). Total organic carbon concentrations during the study period at the Highway 50 site did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022). The maximum total organic carbon value (36 mg/L) at the Sedgwick site exceeded the range of previously reported values (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022) by 4.0 mg/L and were in February 2020. The minimum and maximum total organic carbon values at the Upstream ASR site exceeded the range of previously reported values (Stone and others, 2016) by 1.6 and 5.4 mg/L, respectively, and were in August 2019 and January 2018, respectively (table 4).

Sediment

Sediment is a naturally occurring constituent that is also a pollutant of concern in the Little Arkansas River (Kansas State University Research and Extension and others, 2018). Suspended solids and suspended-sediment concentration are two analytes typically used to describe concentrations of suspended solid-phase material in surface water. Suspended-sediment concentration is a better measure for natural water than suspended solids (Gray and others, 2000), but suspended solids are required for TMDLs. Suspended solids represent suspended solids material and may consist of organic or inorganic material. Suspended solids originate from sources that include algae, decaying vegetation, runoff, discharges (for example, industrial or wastewater), and physical degradation of geologic formations. The amount of suspended solids in a sample is equal to the dry weight of organic and inorganic solids filtered from a subsample of the original sample. Suspended-sediment concentration is the measure of the dry weight of the organic and inorganic sediment in a full sample volume of a water-sediment mixture (Guy, 1969). Suspended sediment may consist of clay, silt, sand, or organic material. Mean Little Arkansas River suspended-solids concentrations were 264, 219, and 184 mg/L at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively, during the study period (table 4). Suspended-solids concentrations during the study period did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022) at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites. The maximum suspended-solids value at the Upstream ASR site exceeded the previously reported value (Stone and others, 2016) by 357 mg/L and was in May 2021 (table 4). Mean suspended-sediment concentrations at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were 400, 232, and 246 mg/L, respectively (table 4). Suspended-sediment concentration during the study period at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites did not exceed previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022). The maximum suspended-sediment concentration at the Upstream ASR site exceeded the previously reported value (Stone and others, 2016) by 706 mg/L and was in May 2021 (table 4).

Indicator Bacteria

E. coli and fecal coliform bacteria are types of coliform bacteria that are generally specific to fecal material from humans and other homeotherms and are commonly used as pathogen indicators (Myers and others, 2014). E. coli and fecal coliform bacteria presence indicates potentially contaminated water by human or animal wastes and presence of other harmful bacteria or viruses (Dufour and others, 1981; Dufour, 1984). The State of Kansas E. coli criteria for publicly accessible (Class B) Kansas streams with flows of at least 1 ft3/s require that the geometric mean of at least five samples collected during separate 24-hour periods within a 30-day period not exceed 262 colony forming units per 100 milliliters (cfu/100 mL) for primary contact during April 1 through October 31 of each year and 2,358 cfu/100 mL during November 1 through March 31 (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2011, 2017, 2018). Little Arkansas River E. coli and fecal coliform medians ranged from 540 to 640 cfu/100 mL and 590 to 910 cfu/100 mL, respectively, at the three study sites during the study period (table 4). E. coli densities exceeded the primary contact Class B criteria of 262 cfu/100 mL at all sites (table 4). E. coli densities exceeded the primary contact Class B criteria of 262 cfu/100 mL in 67, 60, and 62 percent of samples at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. E. coli densities at the Highway 50 site were within ranges previously reported (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022); the maximum E. coli densities at the Sedgwick and Upstream ASR sites exceeded previously reported ranges (Stone and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022) by 1,300 and 11,000 cfu/100 mL, respectively, and were in October 2021 (table 4). Fecal coliform densities at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during the study were within previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and Klager, 2022) during the study (table 4). The maximum fecal coliform density at the Upstream ASR site exceeded the maximum previously reported value (Stone and others, 2016; table 4) by 16,000 cfu/100 mL and were in June 2016.

Trace Elements

Dissolved concentrations of particular interest in the Little Arkansas River include iron and arsenic. Iron in water is derived from rocks and soils (Hem, 1992). Excessive concentrations of iron in water cause unpalatability because of odor, a metallic taste, and rusty color. The EPA Federal SMCL for iron is 300 µg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009) and was exceeded in 5, 7, and 9 percent of samples at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively, during the study period (table 4). Mean study site iron concentrations ranged from 63 to 137 µg/L (table 4). Iron concentrations at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites did not exceed the ranges previously reported (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2019). The maximum iron concentrations at the Upstream ASR site exceeded the previously reported range (Stone and others, 2016) by 807 µg/L and were during August 2019 (table 4).

Arsenic is present naturally in clay layers associated with iron sulfide minerals (Hem, 1992) and is a health concern in drinking water because it causes skin damage, affects the circulatory system, and increases the risk of cancer (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). The EPA Federal MCL for arsenic is 10 µg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009) and was exceeded in 10 percent of samples at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick site and 25 percent of samples at the Upstream ASR site (table 4). Mean arsenic concentrations were 5.4, 5.8, and 7.7 µg/L at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites during the study period (table 4). Arsenic concentrations were within the ranges previously reported (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2019) at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites (table 4). The minimum arsenic concentration was 1.6 µg/L less than the range previously reported (Stone and others, 2016; table 4) at the Upstream ASR site and was in May 2019.

Pesticides

Pesticides enter streams from field application and through irrigation return flow and surface runoff in agricultural landscapes. Pesticides that were detected in greater than one-half of the collected samples at any of the three study sites included 2-chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine (deethylatrazine, a degradation product of the atrazine molecule), acetochlor (applied herbicide), AMPA (a chemical that results from the breakdown of glyphosate), atrazine (applied herbicide), desulfinylfipronil (a degradation product of the fipronil [applied insecticide] molecule), glyphosate (applied herbicide), metolachlor (applied herbicide), and prometon (applied herbicide; table 4). Mean deethylatrazine concentrations during the study period were 0.350, 0.394, and 0.297 µg/L at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively, and maxima did not exceed previously reported ranges (Stone and others, 2019; table 4). Mean acetochlor concentrations at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were 0.321, 0.380, and 0.982 µg/L, respectively (table 4). Acetochlor maxima exceeded the ranges previously reported (Stone and others, 2016, 2019) by 3.01, 12.2, and 6.14 µg/L at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. AMPA and glyphosate were analyzed for the Sedgwick site only, were detected in all of the samples collected during the study, and mean concentrations were 1.44 and 0.970 µg/L, respectively (table 4). The AMPA maxima exceeded the range previously reported (Stone and others, 2019) by 1.6 µg/L, but glyphosate concentrations were within previously reported ranges (Stone and others, 2019; table 4). Mean study period metolachlor concentrations were 2.08 µg/L at the Highway 50 site and 1.77 µg/L at the Sedgwick and Upstream ASR sites (table 4). Metolachlor maxima at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites exceeded the ranges previously reported (Stone and others, 2016, 2019; table 4) by 24.4, 0.9, and 5.28 µg/L, respectively.

Atrazine is an herbicide commonly used on corn and sorghum, which are crops grown in the study area. Atrazine can cause cardiovascular system or reproductive problems in humans (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Previous (2010 through 2014 and 2015 through 2019) NPDES permits (Kansas permit number: I-LA24-PO01; Federal permit number: KS0099694) for the ASR phase II treatment facility required that atrazine be monitored monthly while the facility was operating. The EPA MCL for atrazine is 3.0 µg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009) and was exceeded in 34, 36, and 37 percent of discrete samples at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively (table 4). Mean atrazine concentrations were 3.89, 3.55, and 3.47 µg/L during the study period at Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. Atrazine concentrations during the study were within previously reported ranges (Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022) at all study sites (table 4).

Regression Models for Selected Constituents

New Little Arkansas River regression models were developed for bromide, dissolved organic carbon, deethylatrazine, and metolachlor at all three study sites; new total organic carbon, acetochlor, and atrazine models were developed for the Upstream ASR site; and new AMPA and glyphosate models were developed for the Sedgwick site. Additional streamflow-based or gage-height-based models were developed to compute concentration and load estimates for constituents of interest when concomitant continuous data were unavailable. These models are not intended to stand alone, are not intended to be used under any other circumstance, and are not discussed further in this report. These additional models are the second model listed in table 5 for newly developed models. Atrazine models at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were updated from previously published models (Stone and Klager, 2022). Regression model archive summaries are presented in appendixes 4 (Highway 50), 5 (Sedgwick), and 6 (Upstream ASR). Continuously measured physicochemical properties that were included as surrogates in final models for this study were specific conductance and YSI EXO turbidity (table 5). Selected regression models used to compute real-time water-quality concentrations are available at the USGS National Real-Time Water-Quality website (https://nrtwq.usgs.gov).

Table 5.    

Regression models and summary statistics for continuous water quality constituent computations for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; USGS station 07143672, 1995–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1995–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).

[R2, coefficient of determination; MSE, mean square error; RMSE, root mean square error; RSE, residual standard error; MSPE, model standard percentage error; n, number of discrete samples; mg/L, milligram per liter; USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; log, base 10 logarithm; SC, specific conductance in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; --, not applicable; <, less than; Q, streamflow in cubic feet per second; sin, sine; π, pi; D, day of year; cos, cosine; ASR, aquifer storage and recovery; GH, gage height in feet; TBY, YSI EXO Smart Sensor turbidity in formazin nephelometric units; µg/L, microgram per liter]

Regression model Model archival summary appendix R2 Adjusted R2 Pseudo R2 MSE RMSE RSE Average MSPE Bias correction factor (Duan, 1983) Discrete data
Model dataset date range n Percent left- censored data Range of values in variable measurements Mean Median
log(Br) = 1.273log(SC) − 4.183 4.1 -- -- 0.78 -- -- 0.2240 -- 1.10 May 1998–October2021 188 4 Br: <0.02–1.72 0.32 0.19
SC: 76–2,062 697 597
log(Br) = −0.2945log(Q) + 0.2079sin(2πD/365) + 0.0407cos(2πD/365) − 0.1205 4.2 -- -- 0.42 -- -- 0.3645 -- 1.35 May 1995–October 2021 200 4 Br: <0.02–1.72 0.31 0.18
Q: 1–11,000 836 90
log(Br) = 1.168log(SC) − 4.045 5.1 -- -- 0.72 -- -- 0.2111 -- 1.11 November 1998–August 2021 203 7 Br: <0.02–0.98 0.17 0.13
SC: 96–1,295 577 619
log(Br) = −0.2216log(Q) + 0.1903sin(2πD/365) + 0.1316cos(2πD/365) − 0.4010 5.2 -- -- 0.42 -- -- 0.3070 -- 1.26 March 1995–August 2021 214 7 Br: <0.02–0.98 0.17 0.13
Q: 1.4–15,000 1,280 111
log(Br) = 1.269log(SC) − 4.304 6.1 -- -- 0.89 -- -- 0.1370 -- 1.04 April 2011–October 2021 59 5 Br: <0.04–0.58 0.17 0.14
SC: 88–1,270 557 575
log(Br) = −1.3321log(GH) + 0.24578sin(2πD/365) + 0.0134cos(2πD/365) + 0.1627 6.2 -- -- 0.68 -- -- 0.2428 -- 1.15 April 2011–October 2021 62 5 Br: <0.04–0.58 0.16 0.15
GH: 3.63–29.4 8.24 6.00
log(TOC) = 0.434log(TBY) + 0.212 6.5 0.82 0.82 -- 0.0128 0.1130 0.1157 26 1.03 April 2016–October 2021 44 0 TOC: 3.53–28.3 13 13
TBY: 4.1–467 142 106
log(TOC) = 0.824log(GH) + 0.31 6.6 0.56 0.56 -- 0.0259 0.1610 0.1631 38 1.07 April 2011–October 2021 81 0 TOC: 3.53–28.3 12 11
GH: 3.63–25.7 7.93 5.73
log(2CTRI) = 0.606log(TBY) + 0.1207sin(2πD/365) − 0.4175cos(2πD/365) − 2.35 4.5 -- -- 0.64 -- -- 0.4013 -- 1.39 March 2017–August 2021 37 8 2CTRI: <0.014–1.31 0.18 0.09
TBY: 4.0–1,039 181 39
log(2CTRI) = 0.1567log(Q) + 0.1608sin(2πD/365) − 0.5222cos(2πD/365) − 1.383 4.6 -- -- 0.42 -- -- 0.4920 -- 1.81 May 1995–August 2021 224 11 2CTRI: <0.006–2.69 0.33 0.17
Q: <1–11,000 820 93
log(2CTRI) = 0.5937log(TBY) + 0.2523sin(2πD/365) − 0.3438cos(2πD/365) − 2.21 5.5 -- -- 0.72 -- -- 0.3521 -- 1.32 December 2014–August 2021 46 9 2CTRI: <0.014–1.4 0.24 0.12
TBY: 3.6–702 155 80
log(2CTRI) = 0.2130log(Q) + 0.1815sin(2πD/365) − 0.5958cos(2πD/365) − 1.528 5.6 -- -- 0.55 -- -- 0.4232 -- 1.51 March 1995–August 2021 250 5 2CTRI: <0.0145–2.4 0.33 0.17
Q: 1.4–15,000 1,412 141
log(2CTRI) = 0.522log(TBY) + 0.309sin(2πD/365) − 0.276cos(2πD/365) − 1.91 6.7 0.81 0.77 -- 0.0534 0.2310 0.2442 56 1.12 May 2016–August 2021 20 0 2CTRI: 0.020–1.24 0.33 0.24
TBY: 13.6–467 166 141
log(2CTRI) = 0.533log(GH) + 0.345sin(2πD/365) − 0.458cos(2πD/365) − 1.54 6.8 0.48 0.45 -- 0.1459 0.3820 0.3897 100 1.39 April 2011–August 2021 52 0 2CTRI: 0.014–1.52 0.30 0.18
GH: 3.63–29.7 8.62 5.52
log(ACE) = 0.7185log(TBY) + 0.2005sin(2πD/365) − 0.77546cos(2πD/365) − 2.16 6.9 -- -- 0.75 -- -- 0.4209 -- 1.48 May 2016–August 2021 21 5 ACE: <0.072–6.74 1.24 0.70
TBY: 9.9–467 159 138
log(ACE) = 1.684log(GH) + 0.1443sin(2πD/365) − 0.7289cos(2πD/365) − 2.62 6.10 -- -- 0.45 -- -- 0.7138 -- 3.25 April 2011–August 2021 52 8 ACE: <0.01–10.5 0.86 0.20
GH: 3.63–29.7 8.62 5.52
log(AMPA) = 0.165log(TBY) − 0.0931sin(2πD/365) − 0.209cos(2πD/365) − 0.222 5.7 0.76 0.76 -- 0.0149 0.1220 0.1231 28 1.04 October 2014–July 2021 117 0 AMPA: 0.29–4.30 1.42 1.30
TBY: 2.7–603 66 27
log(AMPA) = 0.056log(Q) − 0.0932sin(2πD/365) − 0.271cos(2πD/365) − 0.11 5.8 0.70 0.69 -- 0.0185 0.1360 0.1370 32 1.05 June 2002–July 2021 138 0 AMPA: 0.29–4.30 1.44 1.40
Q: 12–16,100 796 74
log(ATR) = 0.721log(TBY) + 0.405sin(2πD/365) − 0.38cos(2πD/365) − 1.7 4.7 0.62 0.58 -- 0.2809 0.5300 0.5454 154 1.90 March 2017–August 2021 37 0 ATR: 0.018–15.4 2.44 0.64
TBY: 4.0–1,040 181 39
log(ATR) = 0.779log(TBY) + 0.385sin(2πD/365) − 0.278cos(2πD/365) − 1.62 5.9 0.71 0.69 -- 0.1910 0.4370 0.4475 119 1.50 December 2014–August 2021 44 0 ATR: 0.031–30.1 2.93 0.96
TBY: 3.6–702 139 61
log(ATR) = 0.646log(TBY) + 0.556sin(2πD/365) − 0.243cos(2πD/365) − 1.22 6.11 0.81 0.78 -- 0.0992 0.3150 0.3341 79 1.23 May 2016–August 2021 19 0 ATR: 0.061–14.2 2.67 3.66
TBY: 13.6–467 157 138
log(ATR) = 0.759log(GH) + 0.58sin(2πD/365) − 0.51cos(2πD/365) − 0.94 6.12 0.47 0.44 -- 0.3025 0.5500 0.5611 164 1.96 April 2011– August 2021 52 0 ATR: 0.044–19.1 3.50 1.50
GH: 3.63–29.7 8.62 5.52
log(GLY) = 0.402log(TBY) − 0.0594sin(2πD/365) − 0.229cos(2πD/365) − 0.97 5.10 0.60 0.59 -- 0.0767 0.2770 0.2794 68 1.23 October 2014–July 2021 118 0 GLY: 0.05–7.6 0.84 0.50
TBY: 2.7–603 66 27
log(GLY) = 0.215log(Q) − 0.0698sin(2πD/365) − 0.388cos(2πD/365) − 0.83 5.11 0.67 0.64 -- 0.0906 0.3010 0.3032 156 1.67 June 2022–July 2021 139 0 GLY: 0.05–7.8 0.97 0.55
Q: 12–16,100 791 76
log(MET) = 0.812log(TBY) + 0.17sin(2πD/365) − 0.647cos(2πD/365) − 2.13 4.8 0.67 0.64 -- 0.2841 0.5330 0.5485 156 1.67 March 2017–August 2021 37 0 MET: 0.009–13.2 1.72 0.26
TBY: 4.0–1,040 181 39
log(MET) = 0.3974log(Q) + 0.1198sin(2πD/365) − 0.9058cos(2πD/365) − 1.6131 4.9 -- -- 0.60 -- -- 0.6265 -- 2.31 May 1995–August 2021 230 12 MET: <0.02–39.4 1.8 0.5
Q: <1–11,000 805 88
log(MET) = 0.729log(TBY) + 0.108sin(2πD/365) − 0.649cos(2πD/365) − 1.93 5.12 0.74 0.72 -- 0.2016 0.4490 0.4596 123 1.54 December 2014–August 2021 45 0 MET: 0.009–14.7 1.81 0.43
TBY: 3.6–702 155 75
log(MET) = 0.3534log(Q) + 0.0721sin(2πD/365) − 0.9242cos(2πD/365) − 1.61 5.13 -- -- 0.61 -- -- 0.5675 -- 2.15 March 1995–August 2021 255 7 MET: <0.02–15.88 1.7 0.5
Q: 1.4–15,000 1,388 144
log(MET) = 0.768log(TBY) + 0.279sin(2πD/365) − 0.888cos(2πD/365) − 1.97 6.13 0.89 0.87 -- 0.0692 0.2630 0.2790 65 1.15 May 2016- August 2021 19 0 MET: 0.069–12.1 3.09 1.88
TBY: 13.6–467 174 144
log(MET) = 1.54log(GH) + 0.2sin(2πD/365) − 0.708cos(2πD/365) − 2.04 6.14 0.53 0.50 -- 0.3283 0.5730 0.5846 174 1.94 April 2011–August 2021 52 0 MET: 0.021–12.1 1.80 0.46
GH: 3.63–29.7 8.62 5.52
Table 5.    Regression models and summary statistics for continuous water quality constituent computations for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; USGS station 07143672, 1995–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1995–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).

Specific conductance was the sole explanatory variable for bromide at all three study sites (table 5). Specific conductance was positively related to bromide because specific conductance measures the capacity of water to conduct an electrical current and is related to the concentration of ionized substances in water (Hem, 1992). The amount of variance explained by bromide models ranged from 72 percent at the Sedgwick site to 89 percent at the Upstream ASR site (table 5).

YSI EXO turbidity was the sole explanatory variable for total organic carbon at the Upstream ASR site and, in combination with seasonal variables, was an explanatory variable for all modeled pesticides (table 5). Turbidity was positively related to total organic carbon because total organic carbon contains organic material, which is a substantial component of total suspended solids (Hem, 1992). Turbidity was also the sole explanatory variable for total organic carbon at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites in previously developed models (Stone and Klager, 2022). The amount of variance explained by the Upstream ASR total organic carbon model was 82 percent (table 5). YSI EXO turbidity was positively related to deethylatrazine, atrazine, and metolachlor at all three study sites; acetochlor at the Upstream ASR site; and AMPA and glyphosate at the Sedgwick site (table 5), likely because pesticides, similar to sediment, are typically transported during runoff conditions. The amount of variance in deethylatrazine concentrations explained by regression models ranged from 64 percent at the Highway 50 site to 77 percent at the Upstream ASR site (table 5). The acetochlor model at the Upstream ASR site explained 75 percent of the variance in acetochlor concentrations (table 5). The amount of variance explained by the Sedgwick site AMPA and glyphosate models was 76 and 59 percent, respectively (table 5). Previously published atrazine models at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites (Christensen and others, 2003; Rasmussen and others, 2016; Stone and Klager, 2022) included specific conductance and seasonal components as explanatory variables; the most recently published atrazine models (Stone and Klager, 2022) explained 41 percent of the variance at the Highway 50 site and 54 percent of the variance at the Sedgwick site. The updated atrazine models at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites using YSI EXO turbidity as a surrogate explained 58 percent (a 17-percent increase from the most recently published model) and 69 percent (a 15-percent increase from the most recently published model) of the variance, respectively, and the newly developed Upstream ASR atrazine model explained 78 percent of the variance (table 5). The amount of variance explained by the newly developed metolachlor models ranged from 64 percent at the Highway 50 site to 87 percent at the Upstream ASR site (table 5).

Computed Select Water-Quality Constituents

Continuous water-quality concentrations were computed for select constituents using regression models and continuously measured physicochemical parameters. Continuous water-quality concentrations were computed for hardness, dissolved solids, calcium, sodium, bromide, chloride, sulfate, ammonia plus organic nitrogen, total phosphorus, total organic carbon, E. coli bacteria, fecal coliform bacteria, suspended solids, suspended-sediment concentration, arsenic, deethylatrazine, acetochlor, atrazine, glyphosate, and metolachlor. Concentration data were useful for evaluating the water-quality conditions of the Little Arkansas River as well as calculating selected water-quality constituent loads.

Primary Ions

The primary components of dissolved solids come from decomposing rocks and soils. Concentrations of dissolved solids in streams may increase because of atmospheric deposition, sewage inputs, industrial effluent, and agricultural and urban runoff (Hem, 1992). Dissolved solids often are used as a general indicator of salinity or water quality, and large concentrations are undesirable in drinking water because of possible physiological effects, strong mineral tastes, increased treatment costs, and corrosion of plumbing (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Dissolved solids commonly exceeded the EPA SMCL in the Equus Beds aquifer (Ziegler and others, 2010; Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2019). Computed primary components of dissolved solids (hardness, calcium, sodium, bromide, and chloride), with the exception of sulfate, were larger at the Highway 50 site compared to the Sedgwick site (table 6; fig. 3AD). Computed dissolved solids concentrations during the study period ranged from 60 to 1,592 mg/L at the Highway 50 site and 53 to 929 mg/L at the Sedgwick site; mean computed dissolved solids concentrations were 546 and 447 mg/L at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick site, respectively (table 6). During the study period, the EPA SMCL for dissolved solids of 500 mg/L was exceeded 57 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 38 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site (fig. 3A).

Table 6.    

Summary statistics for continuously (daily) computed regression-model water-quality constituents for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1998–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1998–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).

[Continuous real-time water-quality data are available on the U.S. Geological Survey National Real-Time Water-Quality website (https://nrtwq.usgs.gov/ks); n, number of measurements; CaCO3, calcium carbonate; USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; pcode, parameter code; <, less than]

Site Date range n Minimum Maximum Mean Median
Highway 50 May 1988–December 2021 8,431 25 921 281 278
Sedgwick April 1998–December 2021 8,619 23 631 259 262
Highway 50 May 1988–December 2021 8,431 60 1,592 546 546
Sedgwick April 1998–December 2021 8,619 53 929 447 456
Highway 50 May 1988–December 2021 8,431 7.3 300 88 87
Sedgwick April 1998–December 2021 8,619 6.9 196 77 78
Highway 50 May 1988-December 2021 8,431 3.3 394 82 78
Sedgwick April 1998-December 2021 8,619 2.5 161 58 58
Highway 50 May 1988–December 2021 8,431 0.02 1.43 0.44 0.43
Sedgwick April 1998–December 2021 8,619 0.02 0.56 0.23 0.23
Upstream ASR April 2011–December 2021 3,913 0.01 0.61 0.22 0.23
Highway 50 May 1988–December 2021 8,431 6.0 669 156 148
Sedgwick April 1998–December 2021 8,619 3.9 219 81 81
Highway 50 May 1988–December 2021 8,431 4.0 131 42 42
Sedgwick April 1998–December 2021 8,619 3.0 166 55 55
Highway 50 October 1998–December 2021 8,382 0.09 5.76 1.10 0.88
Sedgwick September 1998–December 2021 8,488 0.32 5.04 1.14 0.95
Highway 50 October 1998–December 2021 8,382 0.07 1.80 0.47 0.39
Sedgwick September 1998–December 2021 8,488 0.30 1.53 0.61 0.56
Highway 50 July 2004–December 2021 6,280 0.8 41 9.2 7.8
Sedgwick July 2004–December 2021 6,345 2.3 31 8.3 7.1
Upstream ASR October 2015–December 2021 2,249 2.2 35 8.1 6.7
Highway 50 October 1998–December 2021 8,381 <1 1,949 101 43
Sedgwick September 1998–December 2021 8,483 2 1,379 94 38
Highway 50 October 1998–December 2021 8,380 <1 2,598 134 59
Sedgwick September 1998–December 2021 8,267 3 2,261 129 47
Highway 50 October 1998–December 2021 8,382 1 12,000 800 330
Highway 50 Months of April–October during October 1998–October 2021 4,842 1 11,000 1,000 470
Highway 50 Months of November–March during November 1998–December 2021 3,540 13 12,000 500 140
Sedgwick September 1998–December 2021 8,488 5 31,000 980 230
Sedgwick Months of April–October during September 1998–October 2021 4,955 17 24,000 1,200 380
Sedgwick Months of November–March during November 1998–December 2021 3,533 5 31,000 610 83
Highway 50 October 1998–December 2021 8,382 0 23,000 1,200 420
Sedgwick September 1998–December 2021 8,488 5 37,000 1,300 310
Highway 50 May 1988–December 2021 8,511 1.40 24 6.8 6.1
Sedgwick April 1998–December 2021 8,307 1.56 22 6.4 5.8
Highway 50 January 2017–December 2021 1,801 0.005 0.654 0.094 0.059
Sedgwick September 2014–December 2021 2,667 0.006 0.758 0.109 0.055
Upstream ASR October 2015–December 2021 2,249 0.008 0.858 0.130 0.078
Upstream ASR October 2015–December 2021 2,249 0.003 9.15 0.433 0.107
Sedgwick September 2014–December 2021 2,667 0.425 2.82 1.19 1.06
Highway 50 January 2017–December 2021 1,801 0.034 12.0 1.10 0.507
Sedgwick September 2014–December 2021 2,667 0.030 11.6 1.12 0.446
Upstream ASR October 2015–December 2021 2,249 0.042 16.9 1.49 0.617
Sedgwick September 2014–December 2021 2,667 0.108 5.81 0.662 0.514
Highway 50 January 2017–December 2021 1,801 0.008 7.86 0.660 0.261
Sedgwick September 2014–December 2021 2,667 0.008 6.81 0.612 0.183
Upstream ASR October 2015–December 2021 2,249 0.002 13.4 0.802 0.149
Table 6.    Summary statistics for continuously (daily) computed regression-model water-quality constituents for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1998–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1998–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–21).
Duration curves showing the frequency of exceedance versus computed ions and relevant
                           benchmarks for Little Arkansas River study sites in Kansas.
Figure 3.

Duration curves for continuously (hourly) computed water-quality constituents for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1998–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1998–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2011–2021). A, Dissolved solids. B, Bromide. C, Chloride. D, Sulfate.

Bromide is a constituent of interest because of its potential for conversion to brominated organics of concern through drinking-water treatment processes. Bromate, a known carcinogen, can form during the disinfection of bromide-containing water that involves an oxidation process to kill pathogens (Xie, 2003; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Mean continuously computed bromide concentration during the study period was 0.44, 0.23, and 0.22 mg/L at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively (table 6). Computed bromide concentrations were larger at the Highway 50 site and exceeded the city of Wichita treatment threshold of 0.3 mg/L about 70, 21, and 19 percent of the time at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively (fig. 3B).

Chloride is of particular concern in the Equus Beds aquifer because of the chloride plume upgradient from the city of Wichita’s well field, which was estimated to be moving toward the well field at a rate of as much as 400 feet per year from 1990 through 2008. The plume is expected to continue moving toward the well field regardless of pumping in the area (Klager and others, 2014). Chloride concentrations significantly increased in two shallow monitoring wells near the phase II recharge basin after the onset of artificial recharge, and the increases likely were caused by treated and artificially recharged surface water (Stone and others, 2016). Large chloride concentrations (100 to 500 mg/L) are common in the western part of the study area and along the Arkansas River (fig. 1; Ziegler and others, 2010; Klager and others, 2014; Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2019). Mean Arkansas River chloride concentration was about 600 mg/L during 1988 through 1991 (Myers and others, 1996) and about 500 mg/L during 1997 through 2006 between Hutchinson and Maize, Kans. (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2006a). Little Arkansas River chloride sources include contamination from past oil and gas activity near McPherson, Kans., and industrial and municipal waste-water discharges (Leonard and Kleinschmidt, 1976; Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2006a; Schmidt and others, 2007; Whittemore, 2007). Continuously computed chloride concentrations during the study period were larger at the Highway 50 site (mean: 156 mg/L) compared to the Sedgwick site (mean: 81 mg/L; table 6; fig. 3C). Chloride concentrations exceeded the EPA SMCL of 250 mg/L about 16 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and did not exceed the SMCL at the Sedgwick site (table 6; fig. 3C).

Natural sources of sulfate in surface water and groundwater are rock weathering, oxidation of sulfide minerals, and biological processes (Hem, 1992). Anthropogenic sources of sulfate in water include atmospheric deposition from coal and petroleum combustion products (Hem, 1992) and irrigation return flows. Mean sulfate concentrations during the study period were 42 and 55 mg/L at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, respectively (table 6). Computed sulfate concentrations never exceeded the EPA SMCL of 250 mg/L (table 6; fig. 3D).

Nutrients and Carbon

Nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, have been identified as a primary cause of water-quality and biological degradation in the Midwest and the Nation (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000b, 2006c; Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2004; Dubrovsky and others, 2010; Munn and others, 2018). Dissolved and particulate organic carbon are primary food sources for aquatic food webs. Organic carbon is of interest for ASR operation because of its role in THM formation during the water treatment process. THMs are disinfection byproducts that are formed when naturally existing inorganic and organic materials in water react with the disinfectants chlorine and chloramine (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2005). THMs can cause liver, kidney, and central nervous system problems and are carcinogens (Pyne and others, 1996; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2005). Excessive organic carbon in recharge water may lead to arsenic mobilization in groundwater owing to decreased oxygen from microbial respiration of organic carbon (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2023).

Computed ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations were similar at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during the study (table 6; fig. 4A). Mean computed ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations were 1.10 mg/L at the Highway 50 site and 1.14 mg/L at the Sedgwick site during the study period (table 6). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations exceeded the EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline of 0.52 mg/L about 85 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 93 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site (fig. 4A). Total phosphorus concentrations were generally larger at the Sedgwick site (table 6; fig. 4B). Mean continuously computed total phosphorus concentrations were 0.47 mg/L at the Highway 50 site and 0.61 mg/L at the Sedgwick site (table 6). Total phosphorus concentrations during the study period exceeded the EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline of 0.09 mg/L nearly 100 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 100 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site (fig. 4B). Continuous total organic carbon concentrations were generally larger at the Highway 50 site (table 6, fig. 4C). Mean total organic carbon concentrations were 9.2 mg/L at the Highway 50 site, 8.3 mg/L at the Sedgwick site, and 8.1 mg/L at the Upstream ASR site (table 6).

Duration curves showing the frequency of exceedance versus computed nutrients and
                           relevant benchmarks for Little Arkansas River study sites in Kansas.
Figure 4.

Duration curves for continuously (hourly) computed water-quality constituents for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1998–2021); near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1998–2021); and upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2015–21). A, Ammonia plus organic nitrogen. B, Total phosphorus. C, Total organic carbon.

Sediment

Continuously computed suspended solids and suspended-sediment concentration ranges and means were similar between the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during the study (table 6; fig. 5). Mean suspended solids concentrations were 101 mg/L at the Highway 50 site and 94 mg/L at the Sedgwick site (table 6). Mean suspended-sediment concentrations were 134 and 129 mg/L at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, respectively (table 6).

Duration curves showing the frequency of exceedance versus computed solids for Little
                           Arkansas River study sites in Kansas.
Figure 5.

Duration curves for continuously (hourly) computed water-quality constituents for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1998–2021. A, Suspended solids, B, Suspended-sediment concentration.

Indicator Bacteria

Continuously computed E. coli and fecal coliform bacteria density means were larger at the Sedgwick site during the study period (table 6, fig. 6A). Median study period E. coli densities were 330 cfu/100 mL at the Highway 50 site and 230 cfu/100 mL at the Sedgwick site (table 6). E. coli densities exceeded the Kansas Department of Health and Environment primary contact criterion for Class B recreation of 262 cfu/100 mL during April 1 through October 31 (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2017) 84 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 62 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site during the months of April through October (fig. 6B). E. coli densities exceeded the Kansas Department of Health and Environment primary contact criterion for Class B recreation during November 1 through March 31 and secondary contact criterion for Class A recreation of 2,358 cfu/100 mL 5 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 6 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site during the months of November through March (fig. 6C). Median fecal coliform bacteria densities were 420 and 310 cfu/100 mL at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, respectively (table 6).

Duration curves showing the frequency of exceedance versus computed bacteria and relevant
                           benchmarks for Little Arkansas River study sites in Kansas.Dissolved Arsenic, Atrazine,
                           and Glyphosate
Figure 6.

Duration curves for continuously (hourly) computed Escherichia coli bacteria densities for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1998–2021. A, Escherichia coli bacteria densities for the entire study period. B, Escherichia coli bacteria densities, April–October. C, Escherichia coli bacteria densities, November–March.

Arsenic mobility is generally controlled by adsorption and desorption reactions and solid-phase precipitation and dissolution reactions (Hem, 1992; Hinkle and Polette, 1999; Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2002; McMahon and Chapelle, 2008); these processes are affected by pH, oxidation/reduction reactions, and competing anion presence, all of which could be altered because of artificial recharge activities. The EPA Federal MCL for arsenic is 10 µg/L (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Arsenic is a constituent of concern in the Equus Beds aquifer and commonly is present in concentrations that exceed the MCL (Ziegler and others, 2010; Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2019). Dissolved arsenic concentrations in two shallow monitoring wells near the ASR phase II recharge basin increased significantly after the onset of phase II ASR activity (Stone and others, 2016). Continuously computed arsenic concentrations were generally similar between the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during the study period (table 6; fig. 7A). Mean arsenic concentrations were 6.8 µg/L at the Highway 50 site and 6.4 µg/L at the Sedgwick site (table 6). Continuous arsenic concentrations exceeded the Federal MCL 15 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 9 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site (fig. 7A).

Duration curves showing the frequency of exceedance versus computed arsenic and pesticides
                           and relevant benchmarks for Little Arkansas River study sites in Kansas.
Figure 7.

Duration curves for continuously (hourly) computed water-quality constituents for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672, 1998–2021); Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100, 1998–2021); and Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans. (Upstream ASR; USGS station 375350097262800, 2015–21). A, Arsenic. B, Atrazine. C, Glyphosate.

Atrazine and glyphosate are pesticides that are commonly detected at the Little Arkansas sites (Ziegler and others, 2010; Tappa and others, 2015; Stone and others, 2016, 2019; Stone and Klager, 2022). The EPA MCL is 3.0 µg/L for atrazine and 700 µg/L for glyphosate, and both compounds can cause reproductive difficulties in humans (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Continuously computed atrazine concentrations were largest at the Upstream ASR site (table 6; fig. 7B). Mean computed atrazine concentrations at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites were 1.10 µg/L, 1.12 µg/L, and 1.49 µg/L, respectively (table 6). Atrazine concentrations exceeded the MCL 10 percent of the time at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and 14 percent of the time at the Upstream ASR site during the study (fig. 7B). Computed glyphosate at the Sedgwick site ranged from 0.108 to 5.81 µg/L during the study period and never exceeded the MCL (table 6; fig. 7C).

Computed Water-Quality Constituent Loads and Yields

Annual streamflow volume was smallest in 2006 and largest in 2019 (table 7, fig. 8A). The smallest annual streamflow volume was 9,330 acre-feet (acre-ft) at the Highway 50 site and 22,700 acre-ft at the Sedgwick site (table 7). The largest streamflow volume was 419,000 acre-ft at the Highway 50 site and 725,000 acre-ft at the Sedgwick site (table 7). Kansas experienced several record-breaking hydrologic conditions during 2019, including the most precipitation within a month on record (Davis, 2020).

Table 7.    

Computed annual streamflow volumes and water-quality constituent loads and yields for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.

[--, not applicable. All loads and yields are estimated. Water-quality constituent loads are expressed in tons and yields are expressed in pounds per square mile. Streamflow volumes are expressed in acre-feet and yields are expressed in acre-feet per acre]

Year Load Yield
Highway 50 Sedgwick Highway 50 Sedgwick
1995 264,000 504,000 0.60 0.68
1996 81,000 117,000 0.18 0.16
1997 135,000 243,000 0.31 0.33
1998 261,000 311,000 0.60 0.42
1999 251,000 369,000 0.57 0.49
2000 173,000 277,000 0.39 0.37
2001 177,000 272,000 0.40 0.36
2002 96,100 155,000 0.22 0.21
2003 150,000 238,000 0.34 0.32
2004 126,000 219,000 0.29 0.29
2005 138,000 301,000 0.32 0.40
2006 9,330 22,700 0.02 0.03
2007 280,000 349,000 0.64 0.47
2008 134,000 246,000 0.31 0.33
2009 202,000 319,000 0.46 0.43
2010 125,000 248,000 0.28 0.33
2011 12,700 29,400 0.03 0.04
2012 15,600 40,400 0.04 0.05
2013 245,000 402,000 0.56 0.54
2014 73,700 123,000 0.17 0.17
2015 118,000 242,000 0.27 0.32
2016 211,000 321,000 0.48 0.43
2017 120,000 221,000 0.27 0.30
2018 142,000 252,000 0.32 0.34
2019 419,000 725,000 0.96 0.97
2020 70,200 120,000 0.16 0.16
2021 110,000 214,000 0.25 0.29
Total load or yield 4,140,000 6,880,000 9.44 9.23
Mean annual load or yield 153,000 255,000 0.35 0.34
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 17,600 16,500 51,400 28,300
2000 13,700 13,500 40,100 23,200
2001 12,200 10,800 35,600 18,500
2002 6,170 6,400 18,000 11,000
2003 10,100 9,680 29,600 16,600
2004 7,730 8,000 22,600 13,700
2005 9,170 10,500 26,800 18,100
2006 1,610 2,430 4,690 4,180
2007 10,500 9,870 30,800 16,900
2008 13,500 13,000 39,300 22,300
2009 14,700 14,100 42,800 24,200
2010 7,600 8,390 22,200 14,400
2011 2,290 2,710 6,680 4,650
2012 1,680 2,470 4,890 4,250
2013 6,830 7,530 20,000 12,900
2014 4,930 5,520 14,400 9,480
2015 6,160 8,570 18,000 14,700
2016 9,750 10,600 28,500 18,200
2017 8,840 10,200 25,800 17,400
2018 5,620 7,220 16,400 12,400
2019 18,400 20,000 53,600 34,300
2020 7,550 8,440 22,100 14,500
2021 6,950 8,710 20,300 15,000
Total load or yield 204,000 215,000 595,000 369,000
Mean annual load or yield 8,870 9,350 25,900 16,000
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 -- -- -- --
2000 -- -- -- --
2001 -- -- -- --
2002 -- -- -- --
2003 -- -- -- --
2004 -- -- -- --
2005 -- -- -- --
2006 -- -- -- --
2007 -- -- -- --
2008 -- -- -- --
2009 -- -- -- --
2010 -- -- -- --
2011 -- -- -- --
2012 -- -- -- --
2013 -- 401 -- 688
2014 -- 227 -- 390
2015 -- 489 -- 840
2016 -- 590 -- 1,010
2017 -- 652 -- 1,120
2018 370 584 1,080 1,000
2019 694 1,470 2,030 2,520
2020 205 338 599 580
2021 339 641 991 1,100
Total load or yield 1,610 5,390 4,700 9,250
Mean annual load or yield 403 599 1,180 1,030
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 865 1,180 2,520 2,020
2000 545 737 1,590 1,260
2001 696 1,050 2,030 1,810
2002 363 528 1,060 907
2003 563 768 1,640 1,320
2004 420 683 1,230 1,170
2005 413 934 1,210 1,600
2006 16 37 47 64
2007 793 1,070 2,310 1,830
2008 456 782 1,330 1,340
2009 587 1,050 1,710 1,800
2010 297 638 866 1,090
2011 35 74 103 128
2012 56 133 163 229
2013 452 847 1,320 1,450
2014 211 334 615 574
2015 407 616 1,190 1,060
2016 544 812 1,590 1,390
2017 382 591 1,120 1,010
2018 484 656 1,410 1,130
2019 1,340 1,870 3,920 3,210
2020 247 298 722 512
2021 350 549 1,020 942
Total load or yield 10,500 16,200 30,700 27,800
Mean annual load or yield 457 704 1,330 1,210
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 311 436 907 749
2000 188 291 548 499
2001 274 366 800 629
2002 136 191 398 328
2003 213 283 621 486
2004 173 272 504 467
2005 158 358 460 615
2006 6.0 19 17 32
2007 316 439 921 754
2008 167 318 488 546
2009 231 412 675 707
2010 132 297 384 510
2011 12 32 35 55
2012 19 49 54 85
2013 215 460 627 789
2014 90 150 262 258
2015 149 280 435 481
2016 233 352 679 604
2017 146 251 427 431
2018 183 281 533 482
2019 519 808 1,520 1,390
2020 91 128 265 220
2021 136 235 396 404
Total load or yield 4,090 6,710 12,000 11,500
Mean annual load or yield 178 292 522 500
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 -- -- -- --
2000 -- -- -- --
2001 -- -- -- --
2002 -- -- -- --
2003 -- -- -- --
2004 -- -- -- --
2005 3,190 7,220 9,320 12,400
2006 119 266 348 457
2007 6,430 7,680 18,800 13,200
2008 3,370 5,830 9,830 10,000
2009 4,700 7,460 13,700 12,800
2010 2,690 5,020 7,850 8,610
2011 247 528 722 907
2012 376 856 1,100 1,470
2013 4,460 7,340 13,000 12,600
2014 1,810 2,660 5,290 4,560
2015 3,010 5,240 8,770 9,000
2016 4,730 6,510 13,800 11,200
2017 2,940 4,740 8,570 8,140
2018 3,710 5,290 10,800 9,080
2019 10,400 15,100 30,300 25,900
2020 1,870 2,410 5,470 4,130
2021 2,700 4,380 7,900 7,520
Total load or yield 56,800 88,500 166,000 152,000
Mean annual load or yield 3,340 5,210 9,760 8,940
Table 7.    Computed annual streamflow volumes and water-quality constituent loads and yields for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.
Bar charts showing variable yearly loads during 1995 through 2021 for two Little Arkansas
                        River study sites in Kansas.
Figure 8.

Yearly water-quality constituent loads for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021. A, Streamflow. B, Nitrate plus nitrite as nitrogen. C, Ammonia plus organic nitrogen. D, Total phosphorus. E, Total organic carbon. F, Suspended solids. G, Suspended sediment.

Agricultural practices in the watershed, including fertilizer application, likely contributed a substantial amount of the Little Arkansas River nitrate plus nitrite load during the study period. Nitrate plus nitrite loads were computed during 2018 through 2021 at the Highway 50 site and 2013 through 2021 at the Sedgwick site. Mean annual nitrate plus nitrite loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 403 and 599 tons, respectively (table 7). The total nitrate plus nitrite loads were 1,610 tons at the Highway 50 site and 5,390 tons at the Sedgwick site (table 7). The nitrate plus nitrite load was largest in 2019 at the Highway 50 (694 tons) and Sedgwick (1,470 tons) sites (fig. 8B, table 7). Nitrate plus nitrite yield was 2,030 pounds per square mile (lbs/mi2) at the Highway 50 site and 2,520 lbs/mi2 at the Sedgwick site in 2019 (table 7). Mean annual ammonia plus organic nitrogen loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 457 and 704 tons, respectively (table 7). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen loads for 1999 through 2021 were 10,500 tons at the Highway 50 site and 16,200 tons at the Sedgwick site (table 7). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen loads at both Little Arkansas River study sites were smallest in 2006 and largest in 2019 (fig. 8C, table 7). The ammonia plus organic nitrogen load in 2019 was 1,340 tons (13 percent of total load) at the Highway 50 site and 1,870 tons (12 percent of total load) at the Sedgwick site (fig. 8C, table 7).

Agricultural practices in the watershed also likely contributed a substantial amount of the Little Arkansas River total phosphorus load during the study period. In Kansas, about 75 to 90 percent of phosphorus movement into surface water is particulate phosphorus associated with soil erosion and transport (Devlin and others, 2000). Total phosphorus is listed as an impairment for aquatic life in the study area (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2022). Mean annual total phosphorus loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 178 and 292 tons, respectively (table 7). The total phosphorus load during 1999 through 2021 was 4,090 tons at the Highway 50 site and 6,710 tons at the Sedgwick site (table 7). Annual total phosphorus loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were smallest in 2006 and largest in 2019 (fig. 8D, table 7). Total phosphorus load in 2019 was 519 tons (13 percent of total load) at the Highway 50 site and 808 tons (12 percent of total load) at the Sedgwick site (fig. 8D, table 7). Total phosphorus yield was 1,520 lbs/mi2 at the Highway 50 site and 1,390 lbs/mi2 at the Sedgwick site in 2019 (table 7). Total phosphorus yields for this study during 1999 through 2019 were 12,000 lbs/mi2 at the Highway 50 site and 11,500 lbs/mi2 at the Sedgwick site (table 7).

Mean annual total organic carbon loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 3,340 and 5,210 tons, respectively (table 7). The total organic carbon load during 2005 through 2021 was 56,800 tons at the Highway 50 site and 88,500 at the Sedgwick site (fig. 8E, table 7). Annual total organic carbon loads at both Little Arkansas River sites were smallest in 2006 and largest in 2019 (fig. 8E, table 7). Annual total organic carbon loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 119 and 266 tons in 2006, respectively, and 10,400 tons and 15,100 tons in 2019, respectively (fig. 8E, table 7). Mean annual total organic carbon yields at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 9,760 and 8,940 lbs/mi2, respectively (table 7). Little Arkansas River total organic carbon yield was 30,300 lbs/mi2 at the Highway 50 site and 25,900 lbs/mi2 at the Sedgwick site in 2019 (table 7).

Kansas reservoirs are continually losing storage capacity because of sedimentation (Kansas Water Office, 2022). Suspended solids are listed as an impairment for aquatic life in the study area (Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2022). Mean suspended-solids loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 77,000 and 108,000 tons, respectively (table 8). Little Arkansas River suspended-solids load during 1999 through 2021 was 1,770,000 tons at the Highway 50 site and 2,480,000 tons at the Sedgwick site (fig. 8F, table 8). Annual suspended-solids loads at both Little Arkansas River sites were smallest in 2006 and largest in 2019 (fig. 8F, table 8). Annual suspended-solids loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 2,550 and 3,770 tons in 2006, respectively, and 234,000 and 271,000 tons in 2019, respectively (fig. 8F, table 8). Mean annual suspended-solids yields at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 224,000 and 185,000 lbs/mi2, respectively (table 8). Little Arkansas River suspended-solids yields were 683,000 lbs/mi2 at the Highway 50 site and 466,000 lbs/mi2 at the Sedgwick site in 2019 (table 8).

Table 8.    

Computed annual water-quality constituent loads and yields for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.

[--, not applicable. All loads and yields are estimated. Water-quality constituent loads are expressed in tons and yields are expressed in pounds per square mile, except for bacteria. Bacteria loads are expressed in trillions of colony forming units and yields are expressed in trillions of colony forming units per square mile]

Year Load Yield
Highway 50 Sedgwick Highway 50 Sedgwick
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 171,000 226,200 498,000 388,000
2000 96,300 122,000 281,000 210,000
2001 164,000 219,000 478,000 376,000
2002 79,300 100,000 231,000 172,000
2003 123,000 136,000 360,000 234,000
2004 86,900 115,000 254,000 197,000
2005 50,400 145,000 147,000 249,000
2006 2,550 3,770 7,460 6,460
2007 95,400 123,000 278,000 211,000
2008 66,500 118,000 194,300 203,000
2009 75,000 137,000 219,000 236,000
2010 38,700 74,000 113,000 127,000
2011 4,180 9,740 12,200 16,700
2012 6,830 14,600 19,900 25,100
2013 45,500 86,900 133,000 149,000
2014 33,100 48,300 96,700 82,900
2015 52,700 93,100 154,000 160,000
2016 74,000 118,000 216,000 202,000
2017 65,400 89,700 191,000 154,000
2018 90,100 99,200 263,000 170,000
2019 234,000 271,000 683,000 466,000
2020 51,300 49,300 150,000 84,600
2021 60,300 80,500 176,000 138,000
Total load or yield 1,770,000 2,480,000 5,160,000 4,260,000
Mean annual load or yield 77,000 108,000 224,000 185,000
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 212,000 369,000 619,000 634,000
2000 120,000 235,000 349,000 403,000
2001 204,000 357,000 595,000 613,000
2002 98,700 168,000 288,000 289,000
2003 153,000 264,000 447,000 454,000
2004 114,000 219,000 333,000 376,000
2005 76,800 197,000 224,000 337,700
2006 2,010 4,610 5,870 7,920
2007 151,000 167,000 440,000 287,000
2008 97,100 152,000 283,000 262,000
2009 116,000 183,000 339,000 314,000
2010 60,600 102,000 177,000 176,000
2011 5,740 11,800 16,800 20,300
2012 9,560 18,100 27,900 31,100
2013 77,200 126,000 226,000 217,000
2014 49,800 64,000 145,000 110,000
2015 80,000 193,000 234,000 331,000
2016 114,000 201,000 332,000 345,000
2017 78,300 157,000 229,000 270,000
2018 109,000 173,000 317,000 297,000
2019 279,000 464,000 814,000 797,000
2020 63,300 90,700 185,000 156,000
2021 71,600 142,000 209,000 244,000
Total load or yield 2,340,000 4,060,000 6,840,000 6,970,000
Mean annual load or yield 102,000 177,000 297,000 303,000
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 13,200 21,100 19 31
2000 7,310 11,100 11 16
2001 13,000 22,000 19 32
2002 6,200 10,000 9.0 15
2003 9,640 13,900 14 20
2004 6,840 12,800 10 19
2005 3,930 22,000 5.7 32
2006 115 272 0.2 0.4
2007 7,400 16,100 11 24
2008 5,280 18,500 7.7 27
2009 5,850 19,500 8.5 28
2010 3,000 9,370 4.4 14
2011 330 1,520 0.5 2.2
2012 539 2,100 0.8 3.1
2013 3,450 9,690 5.0 14
2014 2,610 6,940 3.8 10
2015 4,130 19,600 6.0 29
2016 5,750 12,400 8.4 18
2017 4,040 9,810 5.9 14
2018 5,500 10,600 8.0 15
2019 14,400 28,200 21 41
2020 3,080 5,610 4.5 8.2
2021 3,720 10,400 5.4 15
Total load or yield 129,000 294,000 190 430
Mean annual load or yield 5,610 12,800 8.3 19
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 23,400 25,700 34 38
2000 12,700 13,500 18 20
2001 24,100 27,100 35 40
2002 11,200 12,200 16 18
2003 17,600 17,000 26 25
2004 12,100 16,000 18 23
2005 5,850 29,700 8.5 43
2006 178 322 0.3 0.5
2007 10,900 21,100 16 31
2008 7,840 23,500 11 34
2009 8,670 25,100 13 37
2010 4,440 12,300 6.5 18
2011 489 1,930 0.7 2.8
2012 799 2,700 1.2 3.9
2013 5,080 13,000 7.4 19
2014 3,870 8,940 5.7 13
2015 6,120 17,700 8.9 26
2016 8,530 19,000 12 28
2017 5,990 15,000 8.7 22
2018 8,360 16,400 12 24
2019 21,400 43,600 31 64
2020 4,910 8,850 7.2 13
2021 5,480 13,100 8.0 19
Total load or yield 210,000 384,000 310 560
Mean annual load or yield 9,130 16,700 14 24
1995 -- -- -- --
1996 -- -- -- --
1997 -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- --
1999 -- -- -- --
2000 -- -- -- --
2001 -- -- -- --
2002 -- -- -- --
2003 -- -- -- --
2004 -- -- -- --
2005 -- -- -- --
2006 -- -- -- --
2007 -- -- -- --
2008 -- -- -- --
2009 -- -- -- --
2010 -- -- -- --
2011 -- -- -- --
2012 -- -- -- --
2013 -- -- -- --
2014 -- -- -- --
2015 -- 1.3 -- 3.8
2016 -- 1.4 -- 4.0
2017 -- 1.6 -- 4.8
2018 0.19 0.37 0.56 1.1
2019 2.9 4.9 8.5 14
2020 0.42 0.68 1.2 2.0
2021 0.63 1.10 1.8 3.2
Total load or yield 4.2 11 12 33
Mean annual load or yield 1.0 1.6 3.0 4.8
Table 8.    Computed annual water-quality constituent loads and yields for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.

Mean annual suspended-sediment loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 102,000 and 177,000 tons, respectively (table 8). The total Little Arkansas River suspended-sediment load during 1999 through 2021 was 2,340,000 tons at the Highway 50 site and 4,060,000 tons at the Sedgwick site (fig. 8G, table 8). Annual suspended-sediment loads at both Little Arkansas River sites were smallest in 2006 and largest in 2019 (fig. 8G, table 8). Annual suspended-sediment loads at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 2,010 and 4,610 tons in 2006, respectively, and 279,000 and 464,000 tons in 2019, respectively (fig. 8G, table 8). Mean annual suspended-sediment yields at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites were 297,000 and 303,000 lbs/mi2, respectively (table 8). Little Arkansas River suspended-sediment yield was 814,000 lbs/mi2 at the Highway 50 site and 797,000 lbs/mi2 at the Sedgwick site in 2019 (table 8).

About one-quarter to one-half of the study period loads, including nutrients and sediment, were transported during 1 percent of the time during the study (with the exception of chloride loads, which were about one-tenth). About 38 to 40 percent of the total Little Arkansas River suspended-sediment load at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during 1999 through 2021 was transported in the top 1 percent of loading days during high-flow events. Similar studies of the nearby North Fork Ninnescah River have also demonstrated that high-flow events are the main carriers for sediment (Stone and others, 2015; Kramer and others, 2021). Because streamflows are highly sensitive to climatic variation and change (Carlisle and others, 2019) and an increase of extreme precipitation events in the Great Plains is expected (Shafer and others, 2014; Conant and others, 2018; Kloesel and others, 2018), similar disproportionately large pollutant loading events may increase in the future.

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Models

Little Arkansas River water-quality data collected during 1995 (Sedgwick site) or 1996 (Highway 50 site) through 2021 were analyzed for temporal trends and included primary ions, nutrient and carbon species, sediment, indicator bacteria, and trace elements. Changes in annual flow-normalized water-quality concentrations and fluxes were computed for the entire study period (1995 or 1996 through 2021), the period before ASR (phase I) operation onset (1995 or 1996 through 2006; hereafter referred to as “before ASR”), and the period after ASR (phase I) onset (2007 through 2021; hereafter referred to as “after ASR”). The delineation of trend periods does not indicate that ASR activities were the causes of water-quality trends and were selected solely as a convenient way of organizing trend reporting. WRTDS annual mean water-quality constituent concentrations and fluxes are presented in appendixes 7 and 8. WRTDS model evaluation and WBT output for each water-quality constituent are provided in appendixes 9 (Highway 50 site) and 10 (Sedgwick site). Estimated mean annual concentrations with flow-normalized trendlines and 90-percent confidence intervals are presented in figures 9 through 13; larger confidence intervals at the beginning and end of the study period are because of larger streamflow and time uncertainty (Hirsch and others, 2015). Flow-normalized values indicate the overall water-quality constituent trend for the time period irrespective of annual streamflow variability and water-quality trend results incorporate the trend direction uncertainty among years; large flow-normalized water-quality constituent concentration and flux percentage changes may not be reflected in the trend results. WRTDS-estimated yearly water-quality constituent loads are provided in appendix 11.

Primary Ion Trends

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized primary ion concentrations during 1995 through 2021 (fig. 9AK) generally had downward trends based on categories defined by Hirsch and others (2015; table 2); percent decreases in flow-normalized concentrations were generally larger at the Highway 50 site (table 8). Dissolved solids, potassium, sodium, chloride, and fluoride flow-normalized concentrations (fig. 9B, E, F, H, I) were very likely or highly likely to have downward trends at both sites (table 9). Dissolved solids mean annual concentrations decreased by 30 percent (Highway 50 site) and 15 percent (Sedgwick site); sodium concentrations decreased by 49 percent (Highway 50 site) and 32 percent (Sedgwick site); and chloride concentrations decreased by 54 percent (Highway 50 site) and 43 percent (Sedgwick site) during the study period (table 9). Hardness, calcium, and magnesium flow-normalized concentrations (fig. 9A, C, D) had downward trends at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site for the entire study period (table 9). Bromide and silica flow-normalized concentrations (fig. 9G, J) exhibited no trend at the Highway 50 site and downward trends at the Sedgwick site from 1995 through 2021 (table 9). Bromide concentrations decreased by 68 percent at the Highway 50 site and 45 percent at the Sedgwick site during the study period (table 9). Flow-normalized sulfate concentrations (fig. 9K) during the entire study period exhibited a downward trend (and a decrease of 10 percent) at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend (and an increase of 7 percent) at the Sedgwick site (table 9).

Table 9.    

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap test and trend change summary results for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.

[CaCO3, calcium carbonate; USGS, U.S. Geological Survey; mg/L, milligram per liter; --, not applicable; tons/yr, tons per year]

Site Time period Flow-normalized concentration Flow-normalized flux
Trend direction Trend probability Likelihood descriptor Concentration change Percent concentration change Trend direction Trend probability Likelihood descriptor Flux change Percent flux change
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.876 Downward trend is likely −51 mg/L −16 -- 0.668 Downward trend is about as likely as not −1,078 tons/yr −5
1996–2006 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −75.3 mg/L −23 Downward 0.876 Downward trend is likely −3,611 tons/yr −16
2007–21 Upward 0.777 Upward trend is likely 28.3 mg/L 12 Upward 0.738 Upward trend is likely 2,476 tons/yr 13
Sedgwick 1995–2021 -- 0.569 Downward trend is about as likely as not −10.6 mg/L −4 Upward 0.777 Upward trend is likely 1,799 tons/yr 5
1995–2006 Downward 0.926 Downward trend is very likely −37.4 mg/L −14 Downward 0.837 Downward trend is likely −4,499 tons/yr −12
2007–21 Upward 0.946 Upward trend is very likely 27.9 mg/L 12 Upward 0.975 Upward trend is highly likely 6,143 tons/yr 19
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −198 mg/L −30 Downward 0.728 Downward trend is likely −6,259 tons/yr −12
1996–2006 Downward 0.895 Downward trend is highly likely −161 mg/L −25 Downward 0.866 Downward trend is likely −7,457 tons/yr −15
2007–21 -- 0.639 Downward trend is about as likely as not −23.7 mg/L −5 -- 0.569 Upward trend is about as likely as not 1,108 tons/yr 3
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −75 mg/L −15 Downward 0.767 Downward trend is likely −3,875 tons/yr −5
1995–2006 Downward 0.955 Downward trend is highly likely −84.1 mg/L −17 Downward 0.936 Downward trend is very likely −10,083 tons/yr −13
2007–21 Upward 0.748 Upward trend is likely 15.3 mg/L 4 Upward 0.936 Upward trend is very likely 6,591 tons/yr 10
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −16.7 mg/L −16 -- 0.609 Downward trend is about as likely as not −277 tons/yr −4
1996–2006 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −24.2 mg/L −23 Downward 0.876 Downward trend is likely −1,139 tons/yr −16
2007–21 Upward 0.777 Upward trend is likely 8.74 mg/L 11 Upward 0.757 Upward trend is likely 845 tons/yr 14
Sedgwick 1995–2021 -- 0.609 Downward trend is about as likely as not −3.79 mg/L −5 Upward 0.797 Upward trend is likely 640 tons/yr 6
1995–2006 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −12.1 mg/L −15 Downward 0.847 Downward trend is likely −1,403 tons/yr −13
2007–21 Upward 0.946 Upward trend is very likely 8.71 mg/L 12 Upward 0.975 Upward trend is very likely 2,005 tons/yr 20
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.797 Downward trend is likely −2.18 mg/L −13 Downward 0.688 Downward trend is likely −80 tons/yr −6
1996–2006 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −3.64 mg/L −23 Downward 0.827 Downward trend is likely −182 tons/yr −14
2007–21 Upward 0.787 Upward trend is likely 1.65 mg/L 13 -- 0.639 Upward trend is about as likely as not 9.9 tons/yr 9
Sedgwick 1995–2021 -- 0.540 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.351 mg/L −2 Upward 0.678 Upward trend is likely 56 tons/yr 3
1995–2006 Downward 0.866 Downward trend is likely −1.82 mg/L −12 Downward 0.807 Downward trend is likely −239 tons/yr −11
2007–21 Upward 0.896 Upward trend is likely 1.49 mg/L 12 Upward 0.946 Upward trend is very likely 1,043 tons/yr 15
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −2.2 mg/L −27 Downward 0.708 Downward trend is likely −71 tons/yr −4
1996–2006 Downward 0.748 Downward trend is likely −0.314 mg/L −4 -- 0.668 Upward trend is about as likely as not 68 tons/yr 4
2007–21 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −1.8 mg/L −23 Downward 0.896 Downward trend is likely −153 tons/yr −8
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −2.11 mg/L −28 Downward 0.975 Downward trend is highly likely −352 tons/yr −12
1995–2006 Downward 0.936 Downward trend is very likely −0.522 mg/L −7 Downward 0.906 Downward trend is very likely −140 tons/yr −5
2007–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −1.6 mg/L −23 Downward 0.906 Downward trend is very likely −220 tons/yr −8
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −53.6 mg/L −49 Downward 0.936 Downward trend is very likely −1,771 tons/yr −28
1996–2006 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −34.3 mg/L −31 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −1,559 tons/yr −25
2007–21 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −16 mg/L −22 -- 0.599 Downward trend is about as likely as not −187 tons/yr −4
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −22.1 mg/L −32 Downward 0.896 Downward trend is likely −1,872 tons/yr −23
1995–2006 Downward 0.965 Downward trend is highly likely −15.5 mg/L −22 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −1,709 tons/yr −21
2007–21 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −4.93 mg/L −9 -- 0.530 Downward trend is about as likely as not −46 tons/yr −1
Highway 50 1996–2021 -- 0.639 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.628 mg/L −68 Downward 0.718 Downward trend is likely −25 tons/yr −50
1996–2006 -- 0.629 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.558 mg/L −60 Downward 0.698 Downward trend is likely −23 tons/yr −46
2007–21 Downward 0.698 Downward trend is likely −0.0472 mg/L −14 -- 0.649 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.83 tons/yr −3
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.767 Downward trend is likely −0.17 mg/L −45 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −26 tons/yr −51
1995–2006 Downward 0.757 Downward trend is likely −0.161 mg/L −43 Downward 0.787 Downward trend is likely −20 tons/yr −35
2007–21 -- 0.569 Upward trend is about as likely as not 0.00731 mg/L 4 Downward 0.896 Downward trend is likely −6.8 tons/yr −20
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −116 mg/L −54 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −3,340 tons/yr −27
1996–2006 Downward 0.965 Downward trend is highly likely −84.1 mg/L −39 Downward 0.975 Downward trend is highly likely −4,145 tons/yr −33
2007–21 Downward 0.866 Downward trend is likely −26.7 mg/L −21 -- 0.649 Upward trend is about as likely as not 857 tons/yr 10
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.975 Downward trend is highly likely −45.1 mg/L −43 Downward 0.896 Downward trend is likely −3,675 tons/yr −27
1995–2006 Downward 0.906 Downward trend is very likely −28.8 mg/L −27 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −3,445 tons/yr −26
2007–21 Downward 0.965 Downward trend is highly likely −12.5 mg/L −17 -- 0.52 Upward trend is about as likely as not 106 tons/yr 1
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.449 mg/L −65 Downward 0.847 Downward trend is likely −11 tons/yr −22
1996–2006 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.424 mg/L −61 Downward 0.827 Downward trend is likely −7.9 tons/yr −16
2007–21 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −0.0324 mg/L −12 Downward 0.847 Downward trend is likely −3.7 tons/yr −9
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.138 mg/L −35 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −8.8 tons/yr −12
1995–2006 Downward 0.936 Downward trend is very likely −0.074 mg/L −19 Upward 0.965 Upward trend is highly likely 9.4 tons/yr 13
2007–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.0671 mg/L −21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −20 tons/yr −24
Highway 50 1996–2021 -- 0.649 Upward trend is about as likely as not 0.546 mg/L 3 -- 0.579 Upward trend is about as likely as not 148 tons/yr 6
1996–2006 Downward 0.718 Downward trend is likely −0.829 mg/L −5 -- 0.470 Upward trend is about as likely as not 127 tons/yr 5
2007–21 Upward 0.876 Upward trend is likely 1.4 mg/L 9 -- 0.450 Downward trend is about as likely as not −25 tons/yr −1
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.817 Downward trend is likely −0.932 mg/L −6 -- 0.480 Downward trend is about as likely as not −61 tons/yr −1
1995–2006 Downward 0.906 Downward trend is very likely −1.7 mg/L −11 -- 0.540 Downward trend is about as likely as not −129 tons/yr −3
2007–21 Upward 0.866 Upward trend is likely 0.802 mg/L 6 -- 0.589 Downward trend is about as likely as not −400 tons/yr −1
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.718 Downward trend is likely −4.93 mg/L −10 -- 0.589 Downward trend is about as likely as not −305 tons/yr −8
1996–2006 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −10.8 mg/L −23 Downward 0.847 Downward trend is likely −784 tons/yr −21
2007–21 Upward 0.827 Upward trend is likely 7.01 mg/L 19 Upward 0.807 Upward trend is likely 583 tons/yr 20
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Upward 0.847 Upward trend is likely 3.8 mg/L 7 Upward 0.767 Upward trend is likely 587 tons/yr 9
1995–2006 Downward 0.856 Downward trend is likely −8.17 mg/L −15 Downward 0.698 Downward trend is likely −709 tons/yr −11
2007–21 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 11.8 mg/L 26 Upward 0.946 Upward trend is very likely 1,355 tons/yr 24
Table 9.    Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap test and trend change summary results for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.
Time series plots showing year versus water-quality constituent trend lines, annual
                           flow-normalized concentrations, and 90-percent confidence intervals for ions at two
                           Little Arkansas River sites in Kansas.
Figure 9.

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season annual mean concentrations with flow-normalized concentration trend and 90-percent confidence interval for constituents at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021. A, Hardness. B, Dissolved solids. C, Calcium. D, Magnesium. E, Potassium. F, Sodium. G, Bromide. H, Chloride. I, Fluoride. J, Silica. K, Sulfate.

Hardness, calcium, magnesium, silica, and sulfate flow-normalized concentrations had before-ASR downward trends and after-ASR upward trends at both study sites, whereas potassium, sodium, chloride, and fluoride flow-normalized concentrations had downward trends at each site for both periods (table 9). Dissolved solids flow-normalized concentrations had a before-ASR downward trend and no trend after ASR at the Highway 50 site. At the Sedgwick site, dissolved solids flow-normalized concentrations had a before-ASR downward trend and an after-ASR upward trend (table 9). Bromide flow-normalized concentrations had no trend before ASR at the Highway 50 site and after ASR at the Sedgwick site and a downward trend after ASR at the Highway 50 site and before ASR at the Sedgwick site (table 9).

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized primary ion fluxes during 1995 through 2021 generally had downward trends (table 9). Dissolved solids, potassium, sodium, bromide, chloride, and fluoride flow-normalized study period fluxes had downward trends at both study sites (table 9). Hardness, calcium, and sulfate flow-normalized fluxes had no trend at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend at the Sedgwick site for the study period (table 9). Magnesium flow-normalized flux had a study period downward trend at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend for the Sedgwick site and silica flow-normalized flux for the study period had no trend at either site (table 9).

Nutrient and Carbon Species Trends

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized nutrient and carbon species concentrations during 1995 through 2021 (fig. 10AK) generally had downward trends, and concentration percent decreases were generally larger at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Flow-normalized ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations during 2000 through 2021 (fig. 10B) had downward trends that were highly likely at both sites; ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations decreased by 18 percent at the Highway 50 site and 23 percent at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Nitrate plus nitrite flow-normalized concentrations during the study period (fig. 10C) had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and a downward trend at the Sedgwick site; both trends were highly likely (table 10). Flow-normalized total nitrogen concentrations during 2000 through 2021 (fig. 10D) had no trend at the Highway 50 site and a downward trend at the Sedgwick site; total nitrogen concentrations decreased by 1 percent at the Highway 50 site and 38 percent at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite flow-normalized concentrations during the study period (fig. 10A, E, F) had downward trends at the Sedgwick site; of these, ammonia had a downward trend that was highly likely (table 10). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen flow-normalized concentrations had a before-ASR upward trend and an after-ASR downward trend at both sites (table 10). Nitrate plus nitrite flow-normalized concentrations had before- and after-ASR upward trends at the Highway 50 site, no before-ASR trend at the Sedgwick site, and an after-ASR downward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Total nitrogen flow-normalized concentrations had before-ASR trends that were upward for the Highway 50 site and downward for the Sedgwick site and after-ASR trends that were downward at both sites (table 10). Ammonia and nitrate flow-normalized concentrations at the Sedgwick site had no trend before ASR and a downward trend after ASR (table 10). Nitrite concentrations at the Sedgwick site had a downward trend before and after ASR (table 10).

Table 10.    

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap test and trend change summary results for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.

[USGS, US Geological Survey; mg/L, milligram per liter; yr, year; --, not applicable; cfu/100 mL, colony forming units per 100 milliliters]

Site Time period Flow-normalized concentration Flow-normalized flux
Trend direction Trend probability Likelihood descriptor Concentration change Percent concentration change Trend direction Trend probability Likelihood descriptor Flux change Percent flux change
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −0.0563 mg/L −56 Upward 0.708 Upward trend is likely 4.5 tons/yr 11
1996–2006 -- 0.629 Upward trend is about as likely as not 0.00795 mg/L 8 Upward 0.946 Upward trend is very likely 15 tons/yr 37
2007–21 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −0.0735 mg/L −62 Downward 0.787 Downward trend is likely −12 tons/yr −22
Highway 50 2000–21 Downward 0.965 Downward trend is highly likely −0.199 mg/L −18 Upward 0.688 Upward trend is likely 35 tons/yr 8
2000–06 Upward 0.837 Upward trend is likely 0.0934 mg/L 9 -- 0.490 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.097 tons/yr <1
2007–21 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −0.307 mg/L −26 -- 0.639 Upward trend is about as likely as not 36 tons/yr 9
Sedgwick 2000–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.275 mg/L −23 -- 0.569 Downward trend is about as likely as not −23 tons/yr −3
2000–06 Upward 0.698 Upward trend is likely 0.0625 mg/L 5 Upward 0.748 Upward trend is likely 20 tons/yr 3
2007–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.349 mg/L −27 Downward 0.777 Downward trend is likely −42 tons/yr −5
Highway 50 1996–2021 Upward 0.965 Upward trend is highly likely 0.326 mg/L 60 Upward 0.946 Upward trend is very likely 130 tons/yr 77
1996–2006 Upward 0.975 Upward trend is highly likely 0.227 mg/L 42 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 127 tons/yr 75
2007–21 Upward 0.757 Upward trend is likely 0.0622 mg/L 8 -- 0.332 Upward trend is about as likely as not 2.3 tons/yr 1
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.965 Downward trend is highly likely −0.587 mg/L −43 Upward 0.936 Upward trend is very likely 191 tons/yr 53
1995–2006 -- 0.649 Upward trend is about as likely as not 0.0261 mg/L 2 Upward 0.936 Upward trend is very likely 114 tons/yr 32
2007–21 Downward 0.975 Downward trend is highly likely −0.654 mg/L −46 Upward 0.728 Upward trend is likely 79 tons/yr 17
Highway 50 2000–21 -- 0.460 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.0219 mg/L −1 -- 0.629 Upward trend is about as likely as not 46 tons/yr 7
2000–06 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 0.259 mg/L 18 Upward 0.767 Upward trend is likely 30 tons/yr 5
2007–21 Downward 0.936 Downward trend is very likely −0.331 mg/L −19 -- 0.421 Upward trend is about as likely as not 10 tons/yr 2
Sedgwick 2000–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −1.02 mg/L −38 Upward 0.748 Upward trend is likely 66 tons/yr 6
2000–06 Downward 0.837 Downward trend is likely −0.199 mg/L −7 Upward 0.847 Upward trend is likely 58 tons/yr 5
2007–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.798 mg/L −32 -- 0.500 Upward trend is about as likely as not 10 tons/yr 1
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.817 Downward trend is likely −0.798 mg/L −52 Upward 0.688 Upward trend is likely −71 tons/yr −1
1995–2006 -- 0.510 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.128 mg/L −8 -- 0.441 Downward trend is about as likely as not −24 tons/yr −5
2007–21 Downward 0.985 Downward trend is highly likely −0.712 mg/L −49 Upward 0.748 Upward trend is likely 19 tons/yr 4
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −0.0606 mg/L −75 Downward 0.708 Downward trend is likely −22 tons/yr −64
1995–2006 Downward 0.906 Downward trend is very likely −0.0555 mg/L −69 Downward 0.688 Downward trend is likely −15 tons/yr −44
2007–21 Downward 0.916 Downward trend is very likely −0.00803 mg/L −29 Downward 0.767 Downward trend is likely −5.0 tons/yr −29
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.926 Downward trend is very likely −0.149 mg/L −33 Upward 0.975 Upward trend is highly likely 57 tons/yr 57
1995–2006 -- 0.619 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.0521 mg/L −12 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 41 tons/yr 41
2007–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.103 mg/L −26 Upward 0.688 Upward trend is likely 9.9 tons/yr 7
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.188 mg/L −39 -- 0.649 Upward trend is about as likely as not 19 tons/yr 15
1995–2006 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −0.0666 mg/L −14 -- 0.460 Upward trend is about as likely as not 3.0 tons/yr 2
2007–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.119 mg/L −29 Upward 0.738 Upward trend is likely 12 tons/yr 9
Highway 50 2000–21 Upward 0.738 Upward trend is likely 0.0226 mg/L 5 Upward 0.718 Upward trend is likely 19 tons/yr 12
2000–06 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 0.0744 mg/L 17 Upward 0.698 Upward trend is likely 5.3 tons/yr 3
2007–21 Downward 0.975 Downward trend is highly likely −0.0666 mg/L −13 -- 0.649 Upward trend is about as likely as not 13 tons/yr 8
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.807 Downward trend is likely −0.119 mg/L −20 Upward 0.827 Upward trend is likely 23 tons/yr 8
1995–2006 Upward 0.847 Upward trend is likely 0.0769 mg/L 13 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 40 tons/yr 14
2007–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −0.194 mg/L −29 Downward 0.777 Downward trend is likely −18 tons/yr −5
Highway 50 2010–21 Downward 0.926 Downward trend is very likely −1.25 mg/L −20 Downward 0.965 Downward trend is highly likely −732 tons/yr −31
Sedgwick 2010–21 Downward 0.995 Downward trend is highly likely −3.24 mg/L −43 Downward 0.906 Downward trend is very likely −855 tons/yr −24
Highway 50 1996–2021 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 3.02 mg/L 53 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 2,247 tons/yr 125
1996–2006 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 4.07 mg/L 71 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 1,588 tons/yr 88
2007–21 Downward 0.817 Downward trend is likely −1.4 mg/L −14 Upward 0.698 Upward trend is likely 363 tons/yr 10
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 2.71 mg/L 52 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 4,134 tons/yr 162
1995–2006 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 3.93 mg/L 76 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 3,034 tons/yr 119
2007–21 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −1.49 mg/L −16 Upward 0.748 Upward trend is likely 709 tons/yr 12
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.698 Downward trend is likely −14.5 mg/L −12 Upward 0.698 Upward trend is likely 10,207 tons/yr 13
1996–2006 Downward 0.708 Downward trend is likely −9.97 mg/L −8 -- 0.540 Downward trend is about as likely as not −2,111 tons/yr −3
2007–21 -- 0.609 Downward trend is about as likely as not −5.94 mg/ L −5 -- 0.658 Upward trend is about as likely as not 16,314 tons/yr 23
Sedgwick 1995–2021 -- 0.500 Upward trend is about as likely as not 5.6 mg/L 5 Upward 0.827 Upward trend is likely 40,929 tons/yr 29
1995–2006 -- 0.639 Upward trend is about as likely as not 5.46 mg/L 5 -- 0.559 Upward trend is about as likely as not 1,108 tons/yr 1
2007–21 -- 0.490 Upward trend is about as likely as not 3.46 mg/L 3 Upward 0.876 Upward trend is likely 47,047 tons/yr 35
Highway 50 1998–2021 Upward 0.688 Upward trend is likely 10 mg/L 8 Upward 0.807 Upward trend is likely 35,131 tons/yr 29
1998–2006 Upward 0.975 Upward trend is highly likely 39.8 mg/L 31 -- 0.540 Downward trend is about as likely as not −12,688 tons/yr −10
2007–21 Downward 0.886 Downward trend is likely −38.8 mg/L −22 Upward 0.767 Upward trend is likely 49,824 tons/yr 47
Sedgwick 1998–2021 -- 0.530 Downward trend is about as likely as not −9.54 mg/L −7 -- 0.589 Upward trend is about as likely as not 493 tons/yr <1
1998–2006 Upward 0.728 Upward trend is likely 10.2 mg/L 7 -- 0.658 Downward trend is about as likely as not −28,307 tons/yr −13
2007–21 Downward 0.767 Downward trend is likely −18.4 mg/L −12 Upward 0.807 Upward trend is likely 36,244 tons/yr 19
Highway 50 2001–21 Downward 0.787 Downward trend is likely −467 cfu/100 mL −41 -- 0.540 Upward trend is about as likely as not 1,545x1012 cfu/yr 21
2001–06 -- 0.609 Downward trend is about as likely as not −154 cfu/100 mL −13 Downward 0.688 Downward trend is likely −1,007x1012 cfu/yr −14
2007–21 Downward 0.936 Downward trend is very likely −320 cfu/100 mL −32 -- 0.609 Upward trend is about as likely as not 2,640x1012 cfu/yr 42
Sedgwick 2001–21 Downward 0.827 Downward trend is likely −704 cfu/100 mL −39 -- 0.658 Upward trend is about as likely as not 842x1012 cfu/yr 4
2001–06 Downward 0.738 Downward trend is likely −287 cfu/100 mL −16 -- 0.579 Downward trend is about as likely as not −2,519x1012 cfu/yr −10
2007–21 Downward 0.777 Downward trend is likely −392 cfu/100 mL −26 Upward 0.777 Upward trend is likely 4,095x1012 cfu/yr 20
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.718 Downward trend is likely −1,559 cfu/100 mL −67 -- 0.649 Downward trend is about as likely as not −7,586x1012 cfu/yr −47
1996–2006 -- 0.649 Downward trend is about as likely as not −959 cfu/100 mL −41 -- 0.609 Downward trend is about as likely as not −7,418x1012 cfu/yr −46
2007–21 Downward 0.936 Downward trend is very likely −562 cfu/100 mL −43 Downward 0.688 Downward trend is likely −98x1012 cfu/yr −1
Sedgwick 1995–2021 -- 0.579 Upward trend is about as likely as not 220 cfu/100 mL 22 -- 0.639 Downward trend is about as likely as not −4,143x1012 cfu/yr −14
1995–2006 Upward 0.995 Upward trend is highly likely 1,060 cfu/100 mL 106 Upward 0.797 Upward trend is likely 8,452x1012 cfu/yr 28
2007–21 Downward 0.965 Downward trend is highly likely −742 cfu/100 mL −38 Downward 0.748 Downward trend is likely −6,558x1012 cfu/yr −20
Highway 50 1996–2021 Upward 0.955 Upward trend is highly likely 47.8 µg/L 318 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 83 tons/yr 467
1996–2006 Upward 0.975 Upward trend is highly likely 9.27 µg/L 62 Downward 0.718 Downward trend is likely −3.0 tons/yr −17
2007–21 Upward 0.906 Upward trend is very likely 34 µg/L 118 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 82 tons/yr 459
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Upward 0.916 Upward trend is very likely 17.9 µg/L 69 -- 0.550 Upward trend is about as likely as not 23 tons/yr 42
1995–2006 -- 0.589 Upward trend is about as likely as not 1.14 µg/L 4 Downward 0.698 Downward trend is likely −23 tons/yr −42
2007–21 Upward 0.916 Upward trend is very likely 12.5 µg/L 40 Upward 0.906 Upward trend is very likely 38 tons/yr 92
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.866 Downward trend is likely −38.7 µg/L −11 Downward 0.718 Downward trend is likely −35 tons/yr −32
1995–2006 Downward 0.946 Downward trend is very likely −139 µg/L −23 Downward 0.748 Downward trend is likely −45 tons/yr −40
2007–21 Upward 0.985 Upward trend is highly likely 104 µg/L 24 Upward 0.936 Upward trend is very likely 11 tons/yr 17
Highway 50 1996–2021 Downward 0.876 Downward trend is likely −0.751 µg/L −11 -- 0.658 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.0162 tons/yr −2
1996–2006 Downward 0.847 Downward trend is likely −0.765 µg/L −11 Downward 0.856 Downward trend is likely −0.12 tons/yr −16
2007–21 -- 0.480 Upward trend is about as likely as not 0.075 µg/L 1 Upward 0.926 Upward trend is very likely 0.103 tons/yr 17
Sedgwick 1995–2021 Downward 0.777 Downward trend is likely −0.91 µg/L −14 -- 0.649 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.12 tons/yr −10
1995–2006 Downward 0.678 Downward trend is likely −0.553 µg/L −8 Downward 0.718 Downward trend is likely −0.11 tons/yr −8
2007–21 -- 0.658 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.629 µg/L −5 -- 0.619 Downward trend is about as likely as not −0.021 tons/yr −2
Table 10.    Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap test and trend change summary results for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021.
Time series plots showing year versus water-quality constituent trend lines, annual
                           flow-normalized concentrations, and 90-percent confidence intervals for nutrient and
                           carbon species at two Little Arkansas River sites in Kansas.
Figure 10.

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season annual mean concentrations with flow-normalized concentration trend and 90-percent confidence interval for constituents at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021. A, Ammonia. B, Ammonia plus organic nitrogen. C, Nitrate plus nitrite. D, Total nitrogen. E, Nitrate. F, Nitrite. G, Orthophosphate. H, Dissolved phosphorus. I, Total phosphorus. J, Dissolved organic carbon. K, Total organic carbon.

Flow-normalized orthophosphate concentrations had no trend before ASR and a downward trend after ASR at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Flow-normalized dissolved phosphorus concentrations had a downward trend before ASR and after ASR at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Flow-normalized total phosphorus concentrations for the study period (2000 through 2021 for the Highway 50 site and 1995 through 2021 for the Sedgwick site; fig. 10I) had a likely upward trend at the Highway 50 site and a likely downward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Orthophosphate and dissolved phosphorus flow-normalized concentrations for the study period (fig. 10G, H) had downward trends that were either very or highly likely (table 10). Flow-normalized total phosphorus concentrations had a before-ASR upward trend and an after-ASR downward trend at both sites (table 10).

Dissolved organic carbon flow-normalized concentrations at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during 2010 through 2021 (fig. 10J) had downward trends that were very likely or highly likely (table 10). Dissolved organic carbon concentrations decreased by 20 percent at the Highway 50 site and 43 percent at the Sedgwick site during 2010 through 2021 (table 10). Total organic carbon flow-normalized concentrations during the study period (fig. 10K) had upward trends that were highly likely at both study sites. Total organic carbon concentrations increased 53 percent at the Highway 50 site and 52 percent at the Sedgwick site during the study period (table 10). Total organic carbon flow-normalized concentrations had a before-ASR upward trend and an after-ASR downward trend at both sites (table 10).

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized nutrient and carbon species fluxes during 1995 through 2021 generally had upward trends (table 10). Ammonia plus organic nitrogen flow-normalized fluxes during the study period had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Nitrate plus nitrite fluxes during the study period had upward trends at both sites and increased 77 percent at the Highway 50 site and 53 percent at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Study period flow-normalized total nitrogen fluxes had no trend at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Study period ammonia and nitrate fluxes had upward trends and the nitrite flux had a downward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Before- and after-ASR ammonia plus organic nitrogen fluxes had no trends at the Highway 50 site and had upward and downward trends, respectively, at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Before-ASR nitrate plus nitrite fluxes had upward trends at both sites and after-ASR nitrate plus nitrite fluxes had no trend at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Before- and after-ASR total nitrogen flow-normalized fluxes had upward trends and no trends, respectively, at both sites (table 10). Sedgwick site ammonia flow-normalized fluxes had an upward trend before ASR and a downward trend after ASR. Nitrate fluxes at the Sedgwick site had no before-ASR trend and an after-ASR upward trend. Nitrite fluxes at the Sedgwick site had downward trends for both time periods (table 10).

Study period flow-normalized total phosphorus fluxes had upward trends at both study sites (table 10). Sedgwick site orthophosphate and dissolved phosphorus fluxes during the study period had an upward trend and no trend, respectively (table 10). Orthophosphate fluxes increased by 57 percent during the study period at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Total phosphorus flow-normalized fluxes had upward trends at both sites before ASR; after-ASR total phosphorus fluxes had no trend at the Highway 50 site and a downward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Sedgwick site flow-normalized orthophosphate fluxes before and after ASR had upward trends (table 10). Dissolved phosphorus fluxes at the Sedgwick site had no before-ASR trend and an upward trend after ASR (table 10).

Flow-normalized dissolved organic carbon fluxes during the study period had downward trends at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites with respective decreases of 31 and 24 percent (table 10). Total organic carbon fluxes during the study period had upward trends that were highly likely at both sites. Total organic carbon fluxes increased by 125 percent at the Highway 50 site and 162 percent at the Sedgwick site during the study period (table 10). Both sites had total organic carbon fluxes with upward trends for the before- and after-ASR time periods (table 10).

Sediment Trends

Little Arkansas River sediment concentration and flux trends were generally inconsistent among study sites and time periods (fig. 11; table 10). Little Arkansas River flow-normalized suspended-solids concentrations during the study period (fig. 11A) had a downward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site; suspended-solids concentrations decreased 12 percent at the Highway 50 site and increased 5 percent at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Study period flow-normalized suspended-sediment concentrations (fig. 11B) had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site; suspended-sediment concentrations increased 8 percent at the Highway 50 site and decreased 7 percent at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Suspended-solids concentrations had a downward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site during the before-ASR period (table 10). Suspended-solids concentrations had no trends at either site during the after-ASR period (table 10). Suspended-sediment concentrations had upward trends during the before-ASR period and downward trends during the after-ASR period at both sites (table 10). Suspended-solids fluxes increased 13 and 29 percent and suspended-sediment fluxes increased 29 and <1 percent at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, respectively, during the study period (table 10). Both sites had suspended-solids and suspended-sediment flow-normalized fluxes that had no trend before ASR and upward trends after ASR, except for Highway 50 after ASR, which had no trend (table 10).

Time series plots showing year versus water-quality constituent trend lines, annual
                           flow-normalized concentrations, and 90-percent confidence intervals for solids at
                           two Little Arkansas River sites in Kansas.
Figure 11.

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season annual mean concentrations with flow-normalized concentration trend and 90-percent confidence interval for constituents at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021. A, Suspended solids. B, Suspended-sediment concentration.

Indicator Bacteria Trends

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized indicator bacteria densities during 1995 through 2021 (fig. 12) generally had downward trends, whereas flow-normalized indicator bacteria flux trends were not evident (table 10). Flow-normalized E. coli bacteria densities during the study period (fig. 12A) had downward trends that decreased by about 40 percent at both sites (table 10). Study period fecal coliform densities (fig. 12B) had a downward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Before-ASR flow-normalized E. coli densities had no trend at the Highway 50 site and had a downward trend at the Sedgwick site; after-ASR E. coli densities had downward trends at both sites (table 10). Flow-normalized fecal coliform densities before ASR had no trend at the Highway 50 site and had an upward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). After-ASR fecal coliform densities had a downward trend at both sites (table 10). There were no trends in flow-normalized indicator bacteria fluxes during the study period at either study site (table 10). Before-ASR E. coli bacteria density fluxes had a downward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site; after-ASR E. coli bacteria density fluxes had no trend at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Before-ASR fecal coliform bacteria density fluxes had no trend at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend at the Sedgwick site; after-ASR fecal coliform bacteria density fluxes had downward trends at both sites (table 10).

Time series plots showing year versus water-quality constituent trend lines, annual
                           flow-normalized concentrations, and 90-percent confidence intervals for bacteria at
                           two Little Arkansas River sites in Kansas.
Figure 12.

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season annual mean concentrations with flow-normalized concentration trend and 90-percent confidence interval for constituents at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021. A, Escherichia coli bacteria. B, Fecal coliform bacteria.

Trace Element Trends

Flow-normalized dissolved iron concentrations during the study period (fig. 13A) had upward trends at both study sites; iron concentrations increased 318 percent at the Highway 50 site and 69 percent at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Dissolved iron concentrations during the before ASR time period had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site; dissolved iron concentrations at both sites had upward trends during the after-ASR period (table 10). Sedgwick site flow-normalized dissolved strontium concentrations (fig. 13B) had a downward trend during the entire study and before-ASR time periods, and an upward trend during the after-ASR time period (table 10). Flow-normalized dissolved arsenic concentrations during the entire study (fig. 13C) and before-ASR periods had downward trends at both sites and dissolved arsenic concentrations had no trend at either site during the after-ASR time period (table 10). Dissolved arsenic concentrations decreased 11 percent at the Highway 50 site and 14 percent at the Sedgwick site during the study period (table 10).

Flow-normalized dissolved iron fluxes during the study period had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site; before-ASR dissolved iron fluxes had downward trends at both sites; after-ASR dissolved iron fluxes had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and downward trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10). Flow-normalized dissolved strontium fluxes at the Sedgwick site during the study period and before ASR had a downward trend and after ASR had an upward trend (table 10). Flow-normalized dissolved arsenic fluxes had no trend during the study period at both sites; arsenic fluxes had downward trends for the before-ASR time period at both sites; arsenic fluxes during the after-ASR time period had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site (table 10).

Time series plots showing year versus water-quality constituent trend lines, annual
                           flow-normalized concentrations, and 90-percent confidence intervals for trace elements
                           at two Little Arkansas River sites in Kansas.
Figure 13.

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season annual mean concentrations with flow-normalized concentration trend and 90-percent confidence interval for constituents at the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (Highway 50; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] station 07143672), and Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans. (Sedgwick; USGS station 07144100), 1995–2021. A, Iron. B, Strontium. C, Arsenic.

Several studies have used statistical approaches based on weighted regressions to characterize flow-normalized annual water-quality constituent concentrations and fluxes in U.S. streams (Hirsch and others, 2010; Medalie and others, 2012; Moyer and others, 2012; Murphy and others, 2013; Hickman and Hirsch, 2017; Oelsner and others, 2017; Murphy and Sprague, 2019; Murphy, 2020; Ryberg and others, 2020; Barr and Kalkhoff, 2021; Domagalski and others, 2021; Kramer and others, 2021; Flickinger and Shephard, 2022). Within Kansas, the Little Arkansas River and Arkansas River had downward trends for dissolved solids and chloride concentrations during several time periods during 1972 through 2012 (Oelsner and others, 2017). Arkansas River nitrate concentrations had upward trends for the time periods 1982 through 2012 and 1992 through 2012 (Oelsner and others, 2017). Arkansas River total nitrogen concentrations had a downward trend for the period 1992 through 2012 (Oelsner and others, 2017). Little Arkansas River orthophosphate concentrations had an upward trend for the period 2002 through 2012 (Oelsner and others, 2017). Arkansas River sites had downward total phosphorus concentration trends for earlier time periods (1972 through 2012, 1982 through 2012, and 1992 through 2012) and upward total phosphorus concentrations for the time periods 2002 through 2012 (Oelsner and others, 2017). Several sites in Kansas, including sites along the Verdigris River and Kansas River, had dissolved solids, chloride, and nitrate concentrations with downward trends, and total phosphorus concentrations with upward trends during time periods between 1972 through 2012 (Oelsner and others, 2017). The nearby North Fork Ninnescah River (inflow to Cheney Reservoir, fig. 1) had downward nitrate plus nitrite and upward orthophosphate, total phosphorus, total organic carbon, suspended solids, and suspended-sediment concentration trend probabilities during 1999 through 2019 (Kramer and others, 2021). Future Equus Beds aquifer and Little Arkansas River research efforts would benefit from trend analysis during targeted flow conditions to assess drivers of long-term water-quality concentration changes.

Summary

The Equus Beds aquifer and Cheney Reservoir are primary sources for the city of Wichita’s current (2023) water supply. The Equus Beds aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) project was developed by the city of Wichita to help meet future water demands using Little Arkansas River as an artificial aquifer recharge water source during above-base-flow conditions. Little Arkansas River water is removed from the river at an ASR Facility intake structure, treated using National Primary Drinking Water Regulations as a guideline, and is infiltrated into the Equus Beds aquifer through recharge basins or injected into the aquifer through recharge wells for later use. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the city of Wichita, completed this study to document Little Arkansas River water quantity and quality; document the development and update of regression models that establish relations between continuous and discrete water-quality data; and to characterize and quantify water-quality concentrations, loads, and trends during 1995 through 2021 for primary ions, nutrient and carbon species, sediment, indicator bacteria, trace elements, and pesticides. Water-quality constituents of interest were selected because of their relevance to water-supply or water-quality issues in the Equus Beds aquifer and the Little Arkansas River. Data from this report are important because they can be used to document surface-water quality, quantify potential pollutants, evaluate changing conditions, identify environmental factors affecting surface water, provide science-based information for decision making, and help meet regulatory monitoring requirements.

The Little Arkansas River has a contributing drainage area of primarily agricultural land (producing mainly corn, sorghum, soybeans, and wheat); fertilizers and herbicides are commonly applied in the drainage basin. Several streams in the Little Arkansas River watershed are listed as impaired waterways; impairments include arsenic, chloride, nutrients, sediment, and bacteria. The Little Arkansas River has defined total maximum daily loads for atrazine, nutrients, suspended solids and sediment, fecal coliform bacteria, and total phosphorus.

Data were collected from three sites along the Little Arkansas River. The upstream Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas, streamgage (U.S. Geological Survey station 07143672; hereafter referred to as the “Highway 50 site”) and downstream Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kans., streamgage (U.S. Geological Survey station 07144100; hereafter referred to as the “Sedgwick site”) bracket a substantial portion of the easternmost part of the Equus Beds aquifer. The Little Arkansas River upstream from the ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kans., streamgage (U.S. Geological Survey station 375350097262800; hereafter referred to as the “Upstream ASR site”) is located between the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites, about 14.7 river miles (mi) downstream from the Highway 50 site, about 1.71 river mi upstream from the Sedgwick site, and immediately upstream from the ASR Facility intake structure. The contributing drainage areas for the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites are about 685 square miles (mi2) and 1,165 mi2, respectively.

Continuous (hourly) streamflow and physicochemical parameters (water temperature, specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and nitrate plus nitrite) and discrete water-quality data (primary ions [hardness, dissolved solids, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bromide, chloride, fluoride, silica, and sulfate], nutrient and carbon species [ammonia plus organic nitrogen, nitrate plus nitrite, total phosphorus, and dissolved and total organic carbon], sediment [suspended solids and suspended-sediment concentration], indicator bacteria [Escherichia coli and fecal coliform bacteria], trace elements [iron and arsenic], and pesticides [deethylatrazine, atrazine, and metolachlor]) were collected over a range of streamflows during 1995 through 2021. Surrogate models for water-quality constituents of interest (including bromide, dissolved organic carbon, deethylatrazine, atrazine, and metolachlor) were updated or developed using continuously measured and concomitant discrete data and were used, along with previously developed regression models, to compute concentrations (at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites) and loads (at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites) during the study period. Federal criteria were used to evaluate water quality. Where applicable, water-quality data were compared to Federal national drinking-water regulations. Flow-normalized water-quality constituent trends were evaluated using Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season; statistical models and water-quality trends were described using Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap tests.

The ASR phase II water treatment facility requires a minimum streamflow of about 100 cubic feet per second at the Sedgwick site to operate, and this operational guideline was exceeded about 31 percent of the time during the study; streamflow maxima were during May 2019. Water temperature exceeded the Kansas criterion less than 1 percent of the time. pH was below the Kansas aquatic life-support criterion less than 1 percent of the time and exceeded the upper criterion 3 percent of the time. Dissolved oxygen concentrations were below the Kansas aquatic life-support criterion about 3 to 4 percent of the time; dissolved oxygen minima were during June and July 2016. Continuous nitrate plus nitrite concentrations exceeded the EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline 84 to 99 percent of the time and the nitrate maximum contaminant level (MCL) was exceeded less than 1 percent of the time.

Continuously measured physicochemical properties that were included as surrogates in final regression models for this study were specific conductance, and YSI EXO turbidity. Specific conductance was the sole explanatory variable for bromide; turbidity was the sole explanatory variable for total organic carbon, and turbidity and seasonal components were explanatory variables for pesticides, including deethylatrazine, atrazine, and metolachlor.

Computed primary constituents of dissolved solids (hardness, calcium, sodium, bromide, and chloride), with the exception of sulfate, were larger at the Highway 50 site compared to the Sedgwick site. During the study period, the EPA secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) for dissolved solids (500 milligrams per liter [mg/L]) was exceeded 57 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 38 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site. Computed bromide concentrations were larger at the Highway 50 site and exceeded the city of Wichita treatment threshold (0.3 mg/L) about 70, 21, and 19 percent of the time at the Highway 50, Sedgwick, and Upstream ASR sites, respectively. Chloride concentrations exceeded the EPA SMCL (250 mg/L) about 16 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and did not exceed the SMCL at the Sedgwick site. Computed sulfate concentrations never exceeded the EPA SMCL (250 mg/L) at any site during the study.

Ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations exceeded the EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline (0.52 mg/L) about 85 percent of the time at the Highway 50 site and 93 percent of the time at the Sedgwick site. Total phosphorus concentrations were generally larger at the Sedgwick site and exceeded the EPA level III ecoregion 27 guideline (0.09 mg/L) nearly 100 percent of the time at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites. Continuously computed suspended solids and suspended-sediment concentration ranges and means were similar between the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during the study.

Escherichia coli bacteria densities exceeded the Kansas Department of Health and Environment primary contact guideline (262 colony forming units per 100 milliliters [cfu/100 mL] during April 1 through October 31) 84 to 62 percent of the time and exceeded the Kansas Department of Health and Environment secondary contact guideline (2,358 cfu/100 mL during November 1 through March 31) 5 to 6 percent of the time during the study for the associated periods of time. Continuous arsenic concentrations exceeded the Federal MCL (10 micrograms per liter [µg/L]) 9 to 15 percent of the time during the study. Atrazine concentrations exceeded the MCL (3 µg/L) 10 percent of the time at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and 14 percent of the time at the Upstream ASR site during the study; computed glyphosate concentrations at the Sedgwick site never exceeded the MCL (700 µg/L) during the study.

Annual streamflow volume was smallest in 2006 and largest in 2019 at all sites; as such, nearly all computed water-quality constituent loads were largest in 2019 and smallest in 2006. Agricultural practices in the watershed, including fertilizer application, likely contributed a substantial amount of the Little Arkansas River nitrate plus nitrite and phosphorus loads during the study period. Nitrate plus nitrite loads were computed during 2018 through 2021 at the Highway 50 site and 2013 through 2021 at the Sedgwick site; the total nitrate plus nitrite loads were 1,610 tons at the Highway 50 site and 5,390 tons at the Sedgwick site. Ammonia plus organic nitrogen loads for 1999 through 2021 were 10,500 tons at the Highway 50 site and 16,200 tons at the Sedgwick site. The total phosphorus load during 1999 through 2021 was 4,090 tons at the Highway 50 site and 6,710 tons at the Sedgwick site. The ammonia plus organic nitrogen load during 2005 through 2021 was 56,800 tons at the Highway 50 site and 88,500 tons at the Sedgwick site. Little Arkansas River suspended-solids load during 1999 through 2021 was 1,770,000 tons at the Highway 50 site and 2,480,000 tons at the Sedgwick site. The Little Arkansas River total suspended-sediment load during 1999 through 2021 was 2,340,000 tons at the Highway 50 site and 4,060,000 tons at the Sedgwick site. About 40 percent of the total Little Arkansas River suspended-sediment load at both the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during 1999 through 2021 was transported in the top 1 percent (about 80) of loading days.

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized primary ion concentrations during 1995 through 2021 generally had downward trends and percent decreases in concentrations were generally larger at the Highway 50 site. Dissolved solids, potassium, sodium, chloride, and fluoride flow-normalized concentrations had downward trends that were very likely or highly likely at both sites during the study period. Dissolved solids concentrations decreased by 30 percent (Highway 50 site) and 15 percent (Sedgwick site); sodium concentrations decreased by 49 percent (Highway 50 site) and 32 percent (Sedgwick site); and chloride concentrations decreased by 54 percent (Highway 50 site) and 43 percent (Sedgwick site) during the study period. Bromide and silica flow-normalized concentrations had no trend at the Highway 50 site and a downward trend at the Sedgwick site during the study period. Flow-normalized sulfate concentrations during the study period had a downward trend (and a decrease of 10 percent) at the Highway 50 site and an upward trend (and an increase of 7 percent) at the Sedgwick site. Little Arkansas River flow-normalized primary ion fluxes generally had downward trends. Dissolved solids, potassium, sodium, bromide, chloride, and fluoride flow-normalized study period fluxes had downward trends at both study sites.

Little Arkansas River flow-normalized nutrient and carbon species concentrations during 1995 through 2021 generally had downward trends, and concentration percent decreases were generally larger at the Sedgwick site. Flow-normalized ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations during the study had downward trends at both sites that were highly likely; ammonia plus organic nitrogen concentrations decreased by 18 percent at the Highway 50 site and 23 percent at the Sedgwick site. Nitrate plus nitrite concentrations had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and downward trend at the Sedgwick site; both trends were highly likely. Flow-normalized total phosphorus concentrations for the study period (2000 through 2021 for the Highway 50 site and 1995 through 2021 for the Sedgwick site) had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and a downward trend at the Sedgwick site. Orthophosphate and dissolved phosphorus concentrations had downward trend probabilities that were either very or highly likely at the Sedgwick site. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during 2010 through 2021 had downward trends that were very or highly likely. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations decreased by 20 percent at the Highway 50 site and 43 percent at the Sedgwick site. Total organic carbon concentrations had upward trends that were highly likely at both study sites; total organic carbon concentrations increased about 50 percent at both sites. Little Arkansas River flow-normalized nutrient and carbon species fluxes during the study period generally had upward trends. Nitrate plus nitrite fluxes had upward trends at both sites and increased 77 percent at the Highway 50 site and 53 percent at the Sedgwick site. Total phosphorus fluxes had upward trends at both study sites. Dissolved organic carbon fluxes had downward trends at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites and decreases of 31 percent at the Highway 50 site and 24 percent at the Sedgwick site. Total organic carbon fluxes had upward trends that were highly likely at both sites; total organic carbon fluxes increased by 125 percent at the Highway 50 site and 162 percent at the Sedgwick site.

Little Arkansas River sediment concentration and flux trends were generally inconsistent among study sites and time periods. Suspended-solids concentrations during the study period had a downward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site; suspended-solids concentrations decreased 12 percent at the Highway 50 site and increased 5 percent at the Sedgwick site. Study period flow-normalized suspended-sediment concentrations had an upward trend at the Highway 50 site and no trend at the Sedgwick site; suspended-sediment concentrations increased 8 percent at the Highway 50 site and decreased 7 percent at the Sedgwick site. Indicator bacteria densities generally had downward trend probabilities during the study period, whereas flow-normalized indicator bacteria flux trends were not evident. Dissolved iron concentrations during the study period had upward trends at both study sites; iron concentrations increased 318 percent at the Highway 50 site and 69 percent at the Sedgwick site. Dissolved arsenic concentrations during the entire study had downward trends at both sites and arsenic concentrations decreased 11 percent at the Highway 50 site and 14 percent at the Sedgwick site.

About one-quarter to one-half of the study period loads, including nutrients and sediment, were transported during 1 percent of the time during the study. About 38 to 40 percent of the total Little Arkansas River suspended-sediment load at the Highway 50 and Sedgwick sites during 1999 through 2021 was transported in the top 1 percent of loading days. Because streamflows are highly sensitive to climatic variation and an increase of extreme precipitation events in the Great Plains is expected, similar disproportionately large pollutant loading events may increase into the future. Continuous measurement of physicochemical properties in near-real time allowed characterization of Little Arkansas River surface water during conditions and time scales that would not have been possible otherwise and served as a complement to discrete water-quality sampling. Continuation of this water-quality monitoring will provide data to characterize changing conditions in the Little Arkansas River and possibly identify new and changing trends. Information in this report allows the city of Wichita to make informed municipal water-supply decisions on past and present water-quality conditions and trends in the watershed.

References Cited

Aiken, G.R., 2002, Organic matter in ground water [abs.], in Aiken, G.R., and Kuniansky, E.L., eds., U.S. Geological Survey artificial recharge workshop proceedings, April 2–4, 2002, Sacramento, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02–89, p. 21–23. [Also available at https://water.usgs.gov/ogw/pubs/ofr0289/ga_organic.htm.]

Albert, C.D., and Stramel, G.J., 1966, Fluvial sediment in the Little Arkansas River Basin, Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1798–B, 30 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1798B.]

Allan, J.D., Castillo, M.M., and Capps, K.A., 2021, Stream ecology—Structure and function of running waters (3d ed.): Cham, Switzerland, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 502 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61286-3.]

Anderson, C.W., 2005, Turbidity (ver. 2.1, September 2005): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A6.7, 55 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A6.7.]

Barr, M.N., and Kalkhoff, S.J., 2021, Water-quality trends of urban streams in Independence, Missouri, 2005–18: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5130, 57 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205130.]

Bennett, T.J., Graham, J.L., Foster, G.M., Stone, M.L., Juracek, K.E., Rasmussen, T.J., and Putnam, J.E., 2014, U.S. Geological Survey quality-assurance plan for continuous water-quality monitoring in Kansas, 2014: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1151, 34 p. plus appendixes. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141151.]

Bolks, A., DeWire, A., and Harcum, J.B., 2014, Baseline assessment of left-censored environmental data using R: Fairfax, Va., Developed for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by Tetra Tech, Inc., National Nonpoint Source Monitoring Program Tech Notes 10, 28 p. [Also available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/tech_notes_10_jun2014_r.pdf.]

Camargo, J.A., and Alonso, Á., 2006, Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems—A global assessment: Environment International, v. 32, no. 6, p. 831–849. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002.]

Carlisle, D.M., Wolock, D.M., Konrad, C.P., McCabe, G.J., Eng, K., Grantham, T.E., and Mahler, B., 2019, Flow modification in the Nation’s streams and rivers: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1461, 75 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1461.]

Christensen, V.G., Ziegler, A.C., Rasmussen, P.P., and Jian, X., 2003, Continuous real-time water-quality monitoring of Kansas streams, in Proceedings of the American Water Resources Association 2003 Spring Specialty Conference on Agricultural Hydrology and Water Quality, Kansas City, Mo., May 12–14, 2003: Middleburg, Va., American Water Resources Association Technical Publication Series No. TPS–03–1, 5 p., CD–ROM. [Also available at https://nrtwq.usgs.gov/ks/methods/christensen2003.]

City of Wichita, 1993, Integrated Local Water Supply Plan: Wichita, Kans., City of Wichita.

Cohen, A.C., Jr., 1950, Estimating the mean and variance of normal populations from singly truncated and doubly truncated samples: Annals of Mathematical Statistics, v. 21, no. 4, p. 557–569. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729751.]

Conant, R.T., Kluck, D., Anderson, M., Badger, A., Boustead, B.M., Derner, J., Farris, L., Hayes, M., Livneh, B., McNeeley, S., Peck, D., Shulski, M., and Small, V., 2018, Northern Great Plains, chap. 22 of Reidmiller, D.R., Avery, C.W., Easterling, D.R., Kunkel, K.E., Lewis, K.L.M., Maycock, T.K., and Stewart, B.C., eds., Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States—Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II: Washington, D.C., U.S. Global Change Research Program, p. 941–986. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH22.]

Cook, R.D., 1977, Detection of influential observation in linear regression: Technometrics, v. 19, no. 1, p. 15–18. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.2307/1268249.]

Davis, C., 2020, Hydrologic conditions in Kansas, water year 2019: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2020–3029, 6 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20203029.]

Devlin, D.L., Whitney, D.A., and McVay, K.A., 2000, Phosphorus and water quality in Kansas: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Fact Sheet No. 3, 2 p. [Also available at https://bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/MF2463.pdf.]

Dewitz, J., and U.S. Geological Survey, 2021, National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2019 products (ver 2.0, June 2021): U.S. Geological Survey data release, accessed January 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KZCM54.]

Domagalski, J.L., Morway, E., Alvarez, N.L., Hutchins, J., Rosen, M.R., and Coats, R., 2021, Trends in nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment concentrations and loads in streams draining to Lake Tahoe, California, Nevada, USA: Science of the Total Environment, v. 752, no. 4, art. 141815, 17 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141815.]

Duan, N., 1983, Smearing estimate—A nonparametric retransformation method: Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 78, no. 383, p. 605–610. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1983.10478017.]

Dubrovsky, N.M., Burrow, K.R., Clark, G.M., Gronberg, J.M., Hamilton, P.A., Hitt, K.J., Mueller, D.K., Munn, M.D., Nolan, B.T., Puckett, L.J., Rupert, M.G., Short, T.M., Spahr, N.E., Sprague, L.A., and Wilber, W.G., 2010, The quality of our Nation’s waters—Nutrients in the Nation’s streams and groundwater, 1992–2004: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1350, 174 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1350.]

Dufour, A.P., 1984, Bacterial indicators of recreational water quality: Canadian Journal of Public Health, v. 75, no. 1, p. 49–56. [Also available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/41990233.]

Dufour, A.P., Strickland, E.R., and Cabelli, V.J., 1981, Membrane filter method for enumerating Escherichia coli: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, v. 41, no. 5, p. 1152–1158. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.41.5.1152-1158.1981.]

Flickinger, A.K., and Shephard, Z.M., 2022, Water-quality trends in surface waters of the Jemez River and Middle Rio Grande Basin from Cochiti to Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2004–19: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2022–5062, 33 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225062.]

Garinger, L.P., King, A.S., and Ziegler, A.C., 2011, Effects of experimental passive artificial recharge of treated surface water on water quality in the Equus Beds aquifer, 2009–2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5070, 106 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20115070.]

Gilliom, R.J., 2007, Pesticides in U.S. streams and groundwater: Environmental Science & Technology, v. 41, no. 10, p. 3408–3414. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1021/es072531u.]

Gray, J.R., Glysson, G.D., Turcios, L.M., and Schwarz, G.E., 2000, Comparability of suspended-sediment concentration and total suspended solids data: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 2000–4191, 14 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wri004191.]

Guy, H.P., 1969, Laboratory theory and methods for sediment analysis: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 5, chap. C1, 58 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/twri05C1.]

HACH Company, 2014, Nitratax sc user manual (6th ed.): Hach Company, 40 p. [Also available at https://www.hach.com/asset-get.download-en.jsa?id=7639982966.]

Hald, A., 1949, Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of a normal distribution which is truncated at a known point: Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, v. 1949, no. 1, p. 119–134. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.1949.10419767.]

Hansen, C.V., Whisnant, J.A., and Lanning-Rush, J.L., 2014, Status of groundwater levels and storage volume in the Equus Beds aquifer near Wichita, Kansas, 2012 to 2014: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5185, 39 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20145185.]

Helsel, D.R., 2005, Nondetects and data analysis—Statistics for censored environmental data: Hoboken, N.J., Wiley-Interscience, 268 p.

Helsel, D.R., and Cohn, T.A., 1988, Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply censored water quality data: Water Resources Research, v. 24, no. 12, p. 1997–2004. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i012p01997.]

Helsel, D.R., Hirsch, R.M., Ryberg, K.R., Archfield, S.A., and Gilroy, E.J., 2020, Statistical methods in water resources: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 4, chap. A3, 458 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4a3.]

Hem, J.D., 1992, Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water (3d ed.): U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254, 263 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2254.]

Hickman, R.E., and Hirsch, R.M., 2017, Trends in the quality of water in New Jersey streams, water years 1971–2011: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5176, 58 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20165176.]

Hinkle, S.R., and Polette, D.J., 1999, Arsenic in ground water of the Willamette Basin, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98–4205, 28 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wri984205.]

Hirsch, R.M., Archfield, S.A., and De Cicco, L.A., 2015, A bootstrap method for estimating uncertainty of water quality trends: Environmental Modelling & Software, v. 73, p. 148–166. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.017.]

Hirsch, R.M., and De Cicco, L.A., 2015, User guide to Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends (EGRET) and dataRetrieval—R packages for hydrologic data (ver. 2.0, February 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 4, chap. A10, 93 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4A10.]

Hirsch, R.M., Moyer, D.L., and Archfield, S.A., 2010, Weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WRTDS), with an application to Chesapeake Bay River inputs: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, v. 46, no. 5, p. 857–880. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00482.x.]

Juracek, K.E., and Hansen, C.V., 1995, Digital maps of the extent, base, top, and 1991 potentiometric surface of the High Plains aquifer in Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–613, scales 1:500,000 and 1:1,000,000. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr96613.]

Kansas Department of Agriculture, 2021, Kansas farm facts: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Agriculture, 156 p. [Also available at https://agriculture.ks.gov/docs/default-source/ag-marketing/farm-facts-2021-final.pdf.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2000a, Lower Arkansas River Basin total maximum daily load. Water body—Little Arkansas River subbasin. Water quality impairment—Sediment impact on aquatic life: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 11 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14307/Little-Arkansas-River-Sediment-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2000b, Lower Arkansas River Basin total maximum daily load. Water body—Little Arkansas River subbasin. Water quality impairment—Nutrients and oxygen demand impact on aquatic life: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 14 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14303/Little-Arkansas-River-Bio-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2000c, Lower Arkansas River Basin total maximum daily load. Waterbody—Little Arkansas River subbasin. Water quality impairment—Fecal coliform bacteria: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 14 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14305/Little-Arkansas-River-FCB-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2004, Surface water nutrient reduction plan: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Water, 47 p. [Also available at http://cdm16884.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p16884coll4/id/88.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2006a, Lower Arkansas River Basin total maximum daily load. Waterbody/assessment unit (AU)—Lower Arkansas River—Hutchinson to Maize. Water quality impairment—Chloride: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment,27 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14275/Arkansas-River-Hutch-to-Maize-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2006b, Lower Arkansas River Basin total maximum daily load. Water body/assessment unit—Upper Little Arkansas River. Water quality impairment—Chloride: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 25 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14304/Little-Arkansas-River-Cl-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2008, Lower Arkansas River Basin category 4B alternative. Water body/assessment unit—Little Arkansas River. Water quality impairment—Atrazine: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 35 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14306/Little-Arkansas-River-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2011, Water quality standards white paper—Bacteria criteria for streams: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Water, 7 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9395/Bacteria-Criteria-for-Streams-PDF?bidId=.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2014, Lower Arkansas Basin total maximum daily load. Waterbody/assessment unit—Little Arkansas River watershed. Water quality impairment—Total suspended solids (TSS): Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 53 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14309/Little-Arkansas-River-TSS-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2017, Kansas surface water quality standards—Tables of numeric criteria: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 23 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/13319/Kansas-Surface-Water-Quality-Standards---Tables-of-Numeric-Criteria-March-2-2017-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2018, Kansas Surface Water Quality Standards: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Water, Kansas Administrative Regulations (KAR), title 28, article 16, 28b–h and 58. [variously paged]. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/9390/State-Water-Quality-Standards-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2019, Lower Arkansas River Basin total maximum daily load. Waterbody—Arkansas River, Wichita to Arkansas City and Little Arkansas River, Valley Center to Wichita. Water quality impairment—Total phosphorus and pH: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 107 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14310/Little-Arkansas-River-at-Wichita-TP-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2021, Lower Arkansas River Basin total maximum daily load. Waterbody—Little Arkansas River from Alta Mills to Valley Center. Water quality impairment—Total phosphorus and dissolved oxygen: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 81 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/14308/Little-Arkansas-River-TP-PDF.]

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2022, 2022 303(d) list of all impaired & potentially impaired waters: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 70 p. [Also available at https://www.kdhe.ks.gov/1219/303d-Methodology-List-of-Impaired-Waters.]

Kansas Rural Center, 2018, Pesticides, noxious weed control, and chemical drift protection in Kansas: Kansas Rural Center, 29 p. [Also available at https://kansasruralcenter.org/other-publications/pesticides-weeds-chemical-drift-kansas.]

Kansas State University Research and Extension, Kansas Center for Agricultural Resources and the Environment, and Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2018, Little Arkansas River watershed—Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy: Kansas State University Research and Extension, Kansas Center for Agricultural Resources and the Environment, and Kansas Department of Health and the Environment, 198 p. [Also available at https://kswraps.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Little-Ark-WRAPS-Plan-Update-2018-Final.pdf.]

Kansas Water Office, 2022, The 2022 Kansas Water Plan: Topeka, Kans., Kansas Water Office, [variously paged]. [Also available at https://kwo.ks.gov/water-plan/water-plan.]

Klager, B.J., 2016, Status of groundwater levels and storage volume in the Equus Beds aquifer near Wichita, Kansas, January 2016: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5165, 15 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20165165.]

Klager, B.J., Kelly, B.P., and Ziegler, A.C., 2014, Preliminary simulation of chloride transport in the Equus Beds aquifer and simulated effects of well pumping and artificial recharge on groundwater flow and chloride transport near the city of Wichita, Kansas, 1990 through 2008: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1162, 76 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141162.]

Kloesel, K., Bartush, B., Banner, J., Brown, D., Lemery, J., Lin, X., Loeffler, C., McManus, G., Mullens, E., Nielsen-Gammon, J., Shafer, M., Sorensen, C., Sperry, S., Wildcat, D., and Ziolkowska, J., 2018, Southern Great Plains, chap. 23 of Reidmiller, D.R., Avery, C.W., Easterling, D.R., Kunkel, K.E., Lewis, K.L.M., Maycock, T.K., and Stewart, B.C., eds., Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States—Fourth National Climate Assessment, volume II: Washington, D.C., U.S. Global Change Research Program, p. 987–1035. [Also available https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH23.]

Kramer, A.R., Klager, B.J., Stone, M.L., and Eslick-Huff, P.J., 2021, Regression relations and long-term water-quality constituent concentrations, loads, yields, and trends in the North Fork Ninnescah River, south-central Kansas, 1999–2019: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5006, 51 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215006.]

Lane, C.W., and Miller, D.E., 1965, Geohydrology of Sedgwick County, Kansas: Lawrence, Kans., State Geological Survey of Kansas, Bulletin 176, 100 p. [Also available at https://www.kgs.ku.edu/General/Geology/Sedgwick/index.html.]

Lee, C.J., Hirsch, R.M., and Crawford, C.G., 2019, An evaluation of methods for computing annual water-quality loads: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5084, 59 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195084.]

Leonard, R.B., and Kleinschmidt, M.K., 1976, Saline water in the Little Arkansas River basin area, south-central Kansas: Lawrence, Kans., Kansas Geological Survey, Chemical Quality Series 3, 24 p. [Also available at https://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/Bulletins/CQS3/index.html.]

Mallows, C., 1973, Some comments on Cp: Technometrics, v. 15, no. 4, p. 661–675. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.2307/1267380.]

McMahon, P.B., and Chapelle, F.H., 2008, Redox processes and water quality of selected principal aquifer systems: Ground Water, v. 46, no. 2, p. 259–271. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00385.x.]

Medalie, L., Hirsch, R.M., and Archfield, S.A., 2012, Use of flow-normalization to evaluate nutrient concentration and flux changes in Lake Champlain tributaries, 1990–2009: Journal of Great Lakes Research, v. 38, p. 58–67. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2011.10.002.]

Meyer, M.T., Loftin, K.A., Lee, E.A., Hinshaw, G.H., Dietze, J.E., and Scribner, E.A., 2009, Determination of glyphosate, its degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid, and glufosinate, in water by isotope dilution and online solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 5, chap. A10, 32 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm5A10.]

Moyer, D.L., Hirsch, R.M., and Hyer, K.E., 2012, Comparison of two regression-based approaches for determining nutrient and sediment fluxes and trends in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012‒5244, 118 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20125244.]

Mueller, D.K., Schertz, T.L., Martin, J.D., and Sandstrom, M.W., 2015, Design, analysis, and interpretation of field quality-control data for water-sampling projects: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 4, chap. C4, 54 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm4C4.]

Munn, M.D., Frey, J.W., Tesoriero, A.J., Black, R.W., Duff, J.H., Lee, K.E., Maret, T.R., Mebane, C.A., Waite, I.R., and Zelt, R.B., 2018, Understanding the influence of nutrients on stream ecosystems in agricultural landscapes: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1437, 80 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1437.]

Murphy, J.C., 2020, Changing suspended sediment in United States rivers and streams—Linking sediment trends to changes in land use/cover, hydrology and climate: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, v. 24, no. 2, p. 991–1010. [Also available at. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-991-2020.]

Murphy, J.C., and Sprague, L.S., 2019, Water-quality trends in US rivers—Exploring effects from streamflow trends and changes in watershed management: Science of the Total Environment, v. 656, p. 645–658. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.255.]

Murphy, J.C., Hirsch, R.M., and Sprague, L.A., 2013, Nitrate in the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 1980–2010—An update: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5169, 31 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20135169.]

Myers, D.N., Stoeckel, D.M., Bushon, R.N., Francy, D.S., and Brady, A.M.G., 2014, Fecal indicator bacteria (ver. 2.1, May 2014): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A7, sec. 7.1, 73 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A7.1.]

Myers, N.C., Hargadine, G.D., and Gillespie, J.B., 1996, Hydrologic and chemical interaction of the Arkansas River and the Equus beds aquifer between Hutchinson and Wichita, south-central Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95–4191, 100 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wri954191.]

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2022, Daily summaries station details for Mount Hope, KS, Network ID GHCND:USC00145539: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration database, accessed August 2022 at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets/GHCND/stations/GHCND:USC00145539/detail.

Oelsner, G.P., Sprague, L.A., Murphy, J.C., Zuellig, R.E., Johnson, H.M., Ryberg, K.R., Falcone, J.A., Stets, E.G., Vecchia, A.V., Riskin, M.L., De Cicco, L.A., Mills, T.J., and Farmer, W.H., 2017, Water-quality trends in the Nation’s rivers and streams, 1972–2012—Data preparation, statistical methods, and trend results (ver. 2.0, October 2017): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5006, 136 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175006.]

Painter, C.C., and Loving, B.L., 2015, U.S. Geological Survey quality-assurance plan for surface-water activities in Kansas, 2015: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1074, 33 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151074.]

Pellerin, B.A., Bergamaschi, B.A., Downing, B.D., Saraceno, J.F., Garrett, J.D., and Olsen, L.D., 2013, Optical techniques for the determination of nitrate in environmental waters—Guidelines for instrument selection, operation, deployment, maintenance, quality assurance, and data reporting: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 1, chap. D5, 37 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm1D5.]

Porterfield, G., 1972, Computation of fluvial-sediment discharge: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 3, chap. C3, 66 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/twri03C3.]

Pyne, R.D.G., Singer, P.C., and Miller, C.T., 1996, Aquifer storage recovery of treated drinking water: Denver, Colo., AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association, 176 p.

R Core Team, 2021, R—A language and environment for statistical computing, version 4.1.3: Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Also available at https://www.r-project.org.]

Rasmussen, P.P., Eslick, P.J., and Ziegler, A.C., 2016, Relations between continuous real-time physical properties and discrete water-quality constituents in the Little Arkansas River, south-central Kansas, 1998–2014: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016–1057, 20 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161057.]

Rasmussen, P.P., Gray, J.R., Glysson, G.D., and Ziegler, A.C., 2009, Guidelines and procedures for computing time-series suspended-sediment concentrations and loads from in-stream turbidity-sensor and streamflow data: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 3, chap. C4, 53 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3C4.]

Rasmussen, T.J., Bennett, T.J., Stone, M.L., Foster, G.M., Graham, J.L., and Putnam, J.E., 2014, Quality-assurance and data-management plan for water-quality activities in the Kansas Water Science Center, 2014: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1233, 41 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141233.]

Ryberg, K.R., Stone, W.W., and Baker, N.T., 2020, Causal factors for pesticide trends in streams of the United States—Atrazine and deethylatrazine: Journal of Environmental Quality, v. 49, no. 1, p. 152–162. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20045.]

Ryberg, K.R., and York, B.C., 2020, seawaveQ—An R package providing a model and utilities for analyzing trends in chemical concentrations in streams with a seasonal wave (seawave) and adjustment for streamflow (Q) and other ancillary variables, version 2.0.0: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2020–1082, 25 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20201082.]

Sauer, V.B., and Turnipseed, D.P., 2010, Stage measurement at gaging stations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 3, chap. A7, 45 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A7.]

Schmidt, H.C.R., Ziegler, A.C., and Parkhurst, D.L., 2007, Geochemical effects of induced stream-water and artificial recharge on the Equus Beds aquifer, south-central Kansas, 1995–2004: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5025, 58 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20075025.]

Searcy, J.K., 1959, Flow-duration curves: U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1542–A, 33 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1542A.]

Shafer, M., Ojima, D., Antle, J.M., Kluck, D., McPherson, R.A., Petersen, S., Scanlon, B., and Sherman, K., 2014, Great Plains, chap. 19 of Melillo, J.M., Richmond, T.C., and Yohe, G.W., eds., Climate change impacts in the United States—The Third National Climate Assessment: Washington, D.C., U.S. Global Change Research Program, p. 441–461. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.7930/J0D798BC.]

Smedley, P.L., and Kinniburgh, D.G., 2002, A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters: Applied Geochemistry, v. 17, no. 5, p. 517–568. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5.]

Stone, M.L., 2017, Eighty years of cooperative water science: U.S. Geological Survey General Information Product 174, 2 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/gip174.]

Stone, M.L., and Klager, B.J., 2022, Documentation of models describing relations between continuous real-time and discrete water-quality constituents in the Little Arkansas River, south-central Kansas, 1998–2019: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2022–1010, 34 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221010.]

Stone, M.L., Garrett, J.D., Poulton, B.C., and Ziegler, A.C., 2016, Effects of aquifer storage and recovery activities on water quality in the Little Arkansas River and Equus Beds aquifer, south-central Kansas, 2011–2014: U.S. Geological Survey Report 2016–5024, 88 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20165042.]

Stone, M.L., Juracek, K.E., Graham, J.L., and Foster, G.M., 2015, Quantifying suspended sediment loads delivered to Cheney Reservoir, Kansas—Temporal patterns and management implications: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, v. 70, no. 2, p. 91–100. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.2.91.]

Stone, M.L., Klager, B.J., and Ziegler, A.C., 2019, Water-quality and geochemical variability in the Little Arkansas River and Equus Beds aquifer, south-central Kansas, 2001–16: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5026, 79 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20193017.]

Stone, M.L., Rasmussen, T.J., Bennett, T.J., Poulton, B.C., and Ziegler, A.C., 2012, Protocols for collection of streamflow, water-quality, streambed-sediment, periphyton, macroinvertebrate, fish, and habitat data to describe stream quality for the Hydrobiological Monitoring Program, Equus Beds Aquifer Storage and Recovery Program, city of Wichita, Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1055, 55 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20121055.]

Stramel, G.J., 1967, Progress report on the ground-water hydrology of the Equus-beds area, Kansas—1966: Lawrence, Kans., State Geological Survey of Kansas, Bulletin 187, Part 2, 27 p. [Also available at https://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/Bulletins/187_2/.]

Stullken, L.E., Watts, K.R., and Lindgren, R.J., 1985, Geohydrology of the High Plains aquifer, western Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 85–4198, 86 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wri854198.]

Tappa, D.J., Lanning-Rush, J.L., Klager, B.J., Hansen, C.V., and Ziegler, A.C., 2015, Water quality of the Little Arkansas River and Equus Beds aquifer before and concurrent with large-scale artificial recharge, south-central Kansas, 1995–2012 (ver. 1.1, May 6, 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5023, 67 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20155023.]

Tobin, J., 1958, Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables: Econometrica, v. 26, no. 1, p. 24–36. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382.]

Turnipseed, D.P., and Sauer, V.B., 2010, Discharge measurements at gaging stations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 3, chap. A8, 87 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A8.]

U.S. Census Bureau, 2021, QuickFacts—Wichita city, Kansas—Population estimates, July 1, 2021: U.S. Census Bureau database, accessed August 2022 at https://census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/wichitacitykansas.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2022, Quick stats: U.S. Department of Agriculture database, accessed September 2022 at https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000a, Improved enumeration methods for the recreational water quality indicators—Enterococci and Escherichia coli: Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, EPA–821–R–97–004, 49 p. [Also available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/200036RZ.PDF?Dockey=200036RZ.PDF.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000b, Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual—Rivers and streams: Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA–822–B–00–002, [variously paged]. [Also available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-10/documents/nutrient-criteria-manual-rivers-streams.pdf.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001a, Ambient water quality criteria recommendations—Information supporting the development of state and tribal nutrient criteria for rivers and streams in nutrient ecoregion V: Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA–822–B–01–014, [variously paged]. [Also available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/rivers5.pdf.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001b, Toxicological review of bromate (CAS no. 15541–45–4)—In support of summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, EPA–635–R–01–002, 51 p. [Also available at https://iris.epa.gov/static/pdfs/1002tr.pdf.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2005, Occurrence assessment for the final stage 2 disinfectants and disinfection byproducts rule: Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA–815–R–05–011, [variously paged]. [Also available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P1005ED2.txt.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006a, Method 1103.1—Escherichia coli (E. coli) in water by membrane filtration using membrane-thermotolerant Escherichia coli agar (mTEC): Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA–821–R–06–010, 45 p. [Also available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1002D92.PDF?Dockey=P1002D92.PDF.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006b, Method 1603—Escherichia coli (E. coli) in water by membrane filtration using modified membrane-thermotolerant Escherichia coli agar (modified mTEC): Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA–821–R–06–011, 42 p. [Also available at https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1002DAB.PDF?Dockey=P1002DAB.PDF.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006c, Wadeable streams assessment—A collaborative survey of the Nation’s streams: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA–841–B–06–002, [variously paged].

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009, National primary drinking water regulations: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA–816–F–09–004, 7 p. [Also available at https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulation-table.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2023, Water recycling for climate resilience through enhanced aquifer recharge and aquifer storage and recovery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 832–R–23–001, 36 p. [Also available at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-02/Action%207.4%20Aquifer%20Recharge%20FINAL%202023.pdf.]

U.S. Geological Survey, 2006, Collection of water samples (ver. 2.0, September 2006): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A4, 231 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/twri09A4.]

U.S. Geological Survey, 2019, StreamStats: U.S. Geological Survey Web application, accessed May 8, 2023, at https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/.

U.S. Geological Survey, 2020, Dissolved oxygen: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 9, chap. A6.2, 33 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm9A6.2.] [Supersedes USGS Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chap. A6.2, version 3.0.]

U.S. Geological Survey, 2021, Measurement of pH: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 9, chap. A6.4, 21 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm9A6.4.] [Supersedes USGS Techniques and Water-Resources, book 9, chap. A6.4, version 2.0.]

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Wagner, R.J., Boulger, R.W., Jr., Oblinger, C.J., and Smith, B.A., 2006, Guidelines and standard procedures for continuous water-quality monitors—Station operation, record computation, and data reporting: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 1, chap. D3, 96 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/tm1D3.]

Weibull, W., 1939, The phenomenon of rupture in solids: Ingeniörs Vetenskaps Akademien Handlinga, v. 153, 17 p.

Whisnant, J.A., Hansen, C.V., and Eslick, P.J., 2015, Groundwater-level and storage-volume changes in the Equus Beds aquifer near Wichita, Kansas, predevelopment through January 2015: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5121, 27 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20155121.]

Whittemore, D.O., 2007, Fate and identification of oil-brine contamination in different hydrogeologic settings: Applied Geochemistry, v. 22, no. 10, p. 2099–2114. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.04.002.]

Xie, Y., 2003, Disinfection byproducts in drinking water—Formation, analysis, and control: Boca Raton, Fla., CRC Press, 176 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203486917.]

YSI Incorporated, 2012a, 6-series multiparameter water quality sondes—User manual, revision J: Yellow Springs, Ohio, YSI Incorporated, 379 p. [Also available at https://www.ysi.com/File%20Library/Documents/Manuals/069300-YSI-6-Series-Manual-RevJ.pdf.]

YSI Incorporated, 2012b, EXO user manual—Advanced water quality monitoring platform, revision K: Yellow Springs, Ohio, YSI Incorporated, 243 p. [Also available at https://www.ysi.com/file%20library/documents/manuals/exo-user-manual-web.pdf.]

Zar, J.H., 1999, Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.): New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc., 663 p.

Zhang, Q., and Hirsch, R.M., 2019, River water-quality concentration and flux estimation can be improved by accounting for serial correlation through an autoregressive model: Water Resources Research, v. 55, no. 11, p. 9705–9723. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025338.]

Ziegler, A.C., Christensen, V.G., and Ross, H.C., 1999, Baseline water-quality and preliminary effects of artificial recharge on ground water, south-central Kansas, 1995–98: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4250, 74 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/wri994250.]

Ziegler, A.C., and Combs, L.J., 1997, Baseline data-collection and quality control protocols and procedures for the Equus Beds groundwater recharge demonstration project near Wichita, Kansas, 1995–96: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97–235, 57 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr97235.]

Ziegler, A.C., Hansen, C.V., and Finn, D.A., 2010, Water quality in the Equus Beds aquifer and the Little Arkansas River before implementation of large-scale artificial recharge, south-central Kansas, 1995‒2005: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010‒5023, 143 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20105023.]

Appendix 1. Turbidity Sensor Relations

Figure 1.1 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 2. Turbidity Sensor Comparisons

Table 2.1 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 3. Quality Assurance and Quality Control Summary

Table 3.1 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 4. Surrogate Regression Model Archive Summaries for the Little Arkansas River at Highway 50 near Halstead, Kansas (U.S. Geological Survey station 07143672)

Appendix 4 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 5. Surrogate Regression Model Archive Summaries for the Little Arkansas River near Sedgwick, Kansas (U.S. Geological Survey station 07144100)

Appendix 5 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 6. Surrogate Regression Model Archive Summaries for the Little Arkansas River upstream of ASR Facility near Sedgwick, Kansas (U.S. Geological Survey station 375350097262800)

Appendix 6 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 7. Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Concentrations

Tables 7.1–7.3 are available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 8. Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Fluxes

Tables 8.1–8.3 are available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 9. Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Graphical Output at station 07143672

Appendix 9 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 10. Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Graphical Output at station 07144100

Appendix 10 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Appendix 11. Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season Estimated Yearly Water-Quality Constituent Loads

Table 11.1 is available for download at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023).

References Cited

U.S. Geological Survey, 2023, USGS water data for the Nation: U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System database, accessed August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

Conversion Factors

U.S. customary units to International System of Units

Multiply By To obtain
inch (in.) 2.54 centimeter (cm)
inch (in.) 25.4 millimeter (mm)
foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m)
mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km)
square mile (mi2) 259.0 hectare (ha)
square mile (mi2) 2.590 square kilometer (km2)
acre-foot (acre-ft) 1,233 cubic meter (m3)
acre-foot (acre-ft) 0.001233 cubic hectometer (hm3)
cubic foot per second (ft3/s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second (m3/s)
million gallons per day (Mgal/d) 0.04381 cubic meter per second (m3/s)
foot per day (ft/d) 0.3048 meter per day (m/d)
foot per year (ft/y) 0.3048 meter per year (m/y)
pound, avoirdupois (lb) 0.4536 kilogram (kg)
ton, short (2,000 lb) 0.9072 metric ton (t)
pound per square mile (lb/mi2) 0.4536 kilogram per square mile (kg/mi2)

Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) as °F = (1.8 × °C) + 32.

Supplemental Information

Specific conductance is given in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius (µS/cm at 25 °C).

Turbidity is given in formazin nephelometric units (FNU).

Concentrations of chemical constituents in water are given in either milligrams per liter (mg/L) or micrograms per liter (µg/L).

Concentrations of nitrogen species in water are given in milligrams per liter as nitrogen (mg/L as N).

Concentrations of phosphorus species in water are given in milligrams per liter as phosphorus (mg/L as P).

Bacteria densities in water are given in colony forming units per 100 milliliters (cfu/100 mL).

Abbreviations

<

less than

AMLE

absolute maximum likelihood estimation

AMPA

aminomethylphosphonic acid

ASR

aquifer storage and recovery

deethylatrazine

2-chloro-4-isopropylamino-6-amino-s-triazine

E. coli

Escherichia coli

EGRET

Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends

EGRETci

Exploration and Graphics for RivEr Trends Confidence Intervals

EPA

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

MCL

maximum contaminant level

NPDES

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

NWQL

National Water Quality Laboratory

OLS

ordinary least squares

QA/QC

quality assurance and quality control

R2

coefficient of determination

RPD

relative percentage difference

SMCL

secondary maximum contaminant level

THM

trihalomethane

TKN

total Kjeldahl nitrogen

TMDL

total maximum daily load

USGS

U.S. Geological Survey

WBT

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season bootstrap test

WRTDS

Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season

For more information about this publication, contact:

Director, USGS Kansas Water Science Center

1217 Biltmore Drive

Lawrence, KS 66049

785–842–9909

For additional information, visit: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/kswsc

Publishing support provided by the

Rolla Publishing Service Center

Disclaimers

Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.

Suggested Citation

Stone, M.L., and Klager, B.J., 2023, Long-term water-quality constituent trends in the Little Arkansas River, south-central Kansas, 1995–2021: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2023–5102, 103 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235102.

ISSN: 2328-0328 (online)

Study Area

Publication type Report
Publication Subtype USGS Numbered Series
Title Long-term water-quality constituent trends in the Little Arkansas River, south-central Kansas, 1995–2021
Series title Scientific Investigations Report
Series number 2023-5102
DOI 10.3133/sir20235102
Publication Date September 26, 2023
Year Published 2023
Language English
Publisher U.S. Geological Survey
Publisher location Reston, VA
Contributing office(s) Kansas Water Science Center
Description Report: ix, 103 p.; 1 Figure; 9 Tables; 5 Appendixes; Dataset
Country United States
State Kandad
Online Only (Y/N) Y
Additional Online Files (Y/N) Y
Additional publication details