Skip Links

USGS - science for a changing world

Scientific Investigations Report 2017-5118

Geochemical and Mineralogical Maps, with Interpretation, for Soils of the Conterminous United States

By David B. Smith, Federico Solano, Laurel G. Woodruff, William F. Cannon, and Karl. J. Ellefsen

Zinc

Map
0 to 5cm

0 to 5 cm

A Horizon

A Horizon

C Horizon

C Horizon


INTERPRETATION STATISTICS DOWNLOAD KML
(OPENS WITH GOOGLE EARTH)
DOWNLOAD PDF
(FOR THIS MINERAL/ELEMENT ONLY)
DOWNLOAD TIFF
photograph

The purpose of these interpretive discussions is to provide a perspective on regional- and national-scale variations in element and mineral distributions in soils and their likely causes. The significant spatial variations shown by most elements and minerals can commonly be attributed to geologic sources in underlying parent materials, but other spatial variations seem clearly related to additional factors such as climate, the age of soils, transported source material, and anthropogenic influences. We attempt to distinguish the influence of these various factors on a regional and national scale. Numerous more local features might similarly be related to these same factors, but these features also have some probability of being an artifact of a random sampling of variable compositions, so that there is some probability of samples with similar compositions occurring in clusters of two or more adjacent sites by chance. Distinguishing such random occurrences from true variability is beyond the scope of the data from which these maps are constructed. Some caution, therefore, is advisable in interpreting the significance of these more local features unless some unique sources or processes can clearly be related to them.

Zinc (Zn) is a metallic trace element used in large part as a coating to protect iron (Fe) and steel from corrosion (galvanized metal). It is also used by the chemical, rubber, and paint industries. Zinc is considered essential for humans and all living organisms. It has a relatively low toxicity and, in general, Zn deficiency is a greater problem than Zn toxicity. However, exposure to large amounts of Zn can be harmful. More information about the toxicity of Zn (or other elements and substances) and its potential negative human health impacts can be found at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) website, or click to download a fact sheet about Zn.

Zinc forms many different minerals in combination with sulfur (S), oxygen, and carbonate. Zinc occurs in many common minerals such as pyroxene, amphibole, mica, and garnet, and sulfides. In soils, Zn is often associated with Fe and manganese (Mn) oxides and hydroxides, clay minerals, and organic matter.

The average concentration of Zn in the upper continental crust is estimated to be about 75 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (Hu and Gao, 2008). The average Zn concentration is about 100 mg/kg in shale and mafic rocks (such as basalt and gabbro), 20 mg/kg in sandstone, and 40 mg/kg in limestone.

The distribution of mineral resource deposits with Zn as a commodity (major or minor) in the United States, extracted from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) website, can be seen by hovering the mouse here. Statistics and information on the worldwide supply of, demand for, and flow of Zn–bearing materials are available through the USGS National Minerals Information Center (NMIC) website.

Our data show only a small difference between the three sample types collected. The median Zn concentration is 58 mg/kg in soil from the 0- to 5-cm layer, 59 mg/kg for the soil A horizon, and 54 mg/kg for the soil C horizon (see the summary statistics [open in new window]). In general, the geochemical maps for the three sample types are quite similar for Zn.

The distribution of Zn in soils of the conterminous United States is primarily controlled by the composition of the underlying soil parent materials. Areas of elevated Zn concentrations include:

Areas of northern Idaho, western Montana, west–central Colorado, and near the junction of Oklahoma, Missouri, and Kansas represent areas of historical or current mining activities where Zn was present as either a major or minor constituent of the ore. Soil in these areas may be formed on mineralized bedrock containing elevated concentrations of Zn. In areas of extensive mining and mineral processing, it is also possible that there may be a component of Zn contamination from these activities superimposed on the elevated background concentrations

The Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plain (Fenneman and Johnson, 1946) is bisected by the Southern Mississippi River Alluvium and the Southern Mississippi Valley Loess (USDA, 2006). Alluvial sediments have deposited in the Mississippi River valley as the river flooded in recent geologic time. When these sediments dried, winds picked up the fine material and deposited it in thick loess sheets, mainly along the east side of the river valley. The youngest loess sheets are about 10,000 years old. A pattern of higher Zn concentrations in soil developed on these young sediments reflects long–range transport of Zn–bearing material from the upper part of the Mississippi River drainage basin.

Areas of low Zn concentrations include:

Statistics - 0 TO 5 CM

Number of samples4,841
LLD1 mg/kg
Number below LLD5
Minimum<1 mg/kg
5 percentile12 mg/kg
25 percentile36 mg/kg
50 percentile58 mg/kg
75 percentile80 mg/kg
95 percentile125 mg/kg
Maximum11,700 mg/kg
MAD32.6 mg/kg
Robust CV56.2%
A Horizon Histogram

Histogram


A Horizon Boxplot

Boxplot


A Horizon Empirical cumulative distribution function

Empirical cumulative distribution function


Statistics - A Horizon

Number of samples4,813
LLD1 mg/kg
Number below LLD6
Minimum<1 mg/kg
5 percentile12 mg/kg
25 percentile36 mg/kg
50 percentile59 mg/kg
75 percentile81 mg/kg
95 percentile128 mg/kg
Maximum2,130 mg/kg
MAD34.1 mg/kg
Robust CV57.8 %
A Horizon Histogram

Histogram


A Horizon Boxplot

Boxplot


A Horizon Empirical cumulative distribution function

Empirical cumulative distribution function


Statistics - C Horizon

Number of samples4,780
LLD1 mg/kg
Number below LLD17
Minimum<1 mg/kg
5 percentile10 mg/kg
25 percentile33 mg/kg
50 percentile54 mg/kg
75 percentile76 mg/kg
95 percentile117 mg/kg
Maximum653 mg/kg
MAD31.1 mg/kg
Robust CV57.7 %
C Horizon Histogram

Histogram


C Horizon Boxplot

Boxplot


C Horizon Empirical cumulative distribution function

Empirical cumulative distribution function


 

U.S. Geological Survey Intranet
URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2017/5118/sir20175118_element.php
Page Contact Information:Contact USGS
Page Last Modified: November 12 2019 16:32:37.