Link to USGS home page
Prepared in cooperation with the Miami-Dade Department of Environmental Resources Management
Correlation Analysis of a Ground-Water Level Monitoring Network, Miami-Dade County, Florida

By Scott T. Prinos

The topic is Coastal Erosion. Open-File Report 2004-1412
Abstract
Introduction
Description of Study Area
Previous Studies
Acknowledgments
Correlation Analysis of a Ground-Water Level Monitoring Network
Summary
References Cited
Appendixes I & II
image of Duval County, Florida

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) ground-water level monitoring network in southern Florida began in 1939 as a cooperative effort with the cities of Miami, Miami Beach, and Coral Gables and with Dade County (later renamed Miami-Dade County) to evaluate the effect of a drought on the ground-water supplies in this area (Meinzer and others, 1940). Between 1939 and 2001, the network was expanded to include wells in 10 counties and 3 aquifer systems (which are subdivided into locally named aquifers at some locations). During this period, the hydrology of southern Florida was influenced by urban development and increased management of the hydrologic system. As these changes occurred, the existing network coverage had to be continually modified and redesigned to: (1) aid in the management of the complex hydrologic management system in southern Florida; (2) assess natural and anthropogenic changes affecting the aquifers to protect municipal water supplies; (3) assess water levels in agricultural and urban areas; (4) help eliminate undesirable effects on the delicate ecological system in this area, particularly during droughts; and (5) provide the spatial coverage necessary to produce regional semiannual water-level contour maps, which were used for urban planning.

To provide the coverage necessary to meet the above-mentioned criteria, the network expanded from 4 to 1,020 wells during the 1939-95 period. Ground-water monitoring networks of this size, however, are both difficult and costly to operate. It may be necessary to collect data for decades before changes and trends in the aquifer become evident. Continually monitoring the same wells over a period of decades is a challenge, particularly in urban areas where construction projects often destroy monitoring wells. Sometimes these wells cannot be replaced despite increased efforts. For this and additional reasons, the commitment to cooperatively support collection, computation, quality assurance, publication, and long-term data storage from a network of this size and complexity, through a period that spans many decades can be substantial.

Between 1996 and 2000, the USGS discontinued data collection at many of the wells in its ground-water monitoring network in southern Florida. By 2000, slightly less than half (499 wells) of the 1995 cooperative ground-water monitoring network remained. Most of the wells that were discontinued were measured at a monthly, quarterly, or semiannual frequency. Discontinued wells included most of those that had been needed to produce the regional water-table contour maps. During the 2000-01 drought (Abtew and others, 2003), some wells were added or reinstated to help fill apparent gaps in network coverage, but other wells were discontinued because they were damaged or destroyed. In 2001, there were 518 wells in the network.

The most highly concentrated portion of the current USGS cooperative network occurs in Miami-Dade County in the Biscayne aquifer where 146 wells are used to monitor water levels and aid in evaluation of saltwater encroachment. Ninety-eight of these wells are equipped with water-level recorders to provide continuous monitoring of ground-water levels (fig. 1 and table 1).

Map showing location of continuous ground-water level monitoring network wells in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Figure 1. Map showing location of continuous ground-water level monitoring network wells in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Link to larger version

Although investigations were performed to aid in the design of Miami-Dade County's saltwater encroachment network (Klein and Waller, 1985; Klein and Ratzlaff, 1989; Sonenshein and Koszalka, 1996; Sonenshein, 1997), the design and subsequent changes to the continuous ground-water level monitoring network in the county between 1939 and 2001 were not based on countywide statistical assessments of network coverage, but instead on area specific assessments. Countywide statistical assessments could help ensure that network coverage is sufficient to fully evaluate the complex hydrologic system in this area. These statistical assessments, used in conjunction with other data and analyses, could also be used to help determine whether or not monitoring resources are overallocated.

To aid in the statistical assessment of network coverage, the USGS, in cooperation with the Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management, conducted a study to perform correlation analyses on water-level data from the 98 wells in the continuous ground-water level monitoring network in Miami-Dade County. This report documents the methods used to perform the correlation analysis of the network in Miami-Dade County. Considerations include: (1) spatial relations within the study area, (2) seasonal variation of water level in the study area, and (3) temporal changes in correlation between monitoring wells.

Next:


Figures: Click on a caption to view the figure.
Figure 1. Map showing location of continuous ground-water level monitoring network wells in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Figure 2. Map showing water-supply and water-management systems in Miami-Dade County.

Figure 3. Maps showing lines of equal rainfall in Miami-Dade County during (a) Hurricane Irene on October 14-16, 1999, and an (b) unnamed storm on October 2-3, 2000.

Figure 4. Graphs showing seasonal variation in mean water levels and variation in monthly standard deviation of mean water levels for wells G-620, G-864, G-1183, and S-18.

Figure 5. Hydrograph showing variation in water levels at wells G-3 and G-1368A along with estimated average daily pumpage based on annual pumpage totals during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 6. Hydrograph showing variation in water level at well G-1502 during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 7. Map showing grouping of wells based on average correlation of water-level data during the wet season.

Figure 8. Map showing grouping of wells based on average correlation of water-level data during the dry season.

Figure 9. Map showing grouping of wells based on average correlation of water-level data during both the wet and dry seasons.

Figure 10. Map showing grouping of wells near the West Well Field based on average correlation of water-level data during both wet and dry seasons.

Figure 11. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-1487 and that of well G-855 during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 12. Hydrographs showing water-level elevations from wells G-855 and G-1487 during the 1986 and 1998 water years.

Figure 13. Map showing grouping of wells near the Hialeah-Miami Springs Well Field based on average correlation of water-level data during both the wet and dry seasons.

Figure 14. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-3466 and that of wells G-3465, S-19, and S-68 during water years 1988-2000.

Figure 15. Hydrographs showing water-level elevations from wells G-3465, G-3466, S-19, and S-68 during the 1990 and 1996 water years.

Figure 16. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-3465, G-3466, S-19, and S-68 during water years 1988-99.

Figure 17. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between censored and uncensored water-level data from well G-3466 and that of wells G-3465, S-19, and S-68 during water years 1988-2000.

Figure 18. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water level data from well G-1362 and that of well G-757A during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 19. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-757A and G-1362 during the 1989 and 1997 water years.

Figure 20. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-864 and that of well G-864A during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 21. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-864 and G-864A during the 1990 and 2000 water years.


FirstGov.gov U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Water Resources Discipline, Florida

email Feedback | USGS privacy statement | Accessibility