Link to USGS home page
Prepared in cooperation with the Miami-Dade Department of Environmental Resources Management
Correlation Analysis of a Ground-Water Level Monitoring Network, Miami-Dade County, Florida

By Scott T. Prinos

The topic is Coastal Erosion. Open-File Report 2004-1412
Abstract
Introduction
Correlation Analysis of a Ground-Water Level Monitoring Network
Analytical Considerations
Analysis Methodology
Analysis Results
West Well Field
Hialeah-Miami Springs Well Field
Remaining Well Groups
Summary
References Cited
Appendixes I & II
image of Duval County, Florida

CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF A GROUND-WATER LEVEL MONITORING NETWORK

Analysis Results

Remaining Well Groups

The remaining three well groups each consist of only two wells where water-level data from one well are correlated to that of the other well with an average coefficient of 0.95 or greater (table 4). These groups include wells G-757A and G-1362 in the C-102 and C-1 basins, respectively; wells G-864 and G-864A near the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority Well Field; and wells F-45 and G-3564 in or near the C-7 and C-6 basins, respectively (figs. 1 and 2).

The temporal variation in seasonal correlation between the water-level data from well G-1362 and that of well G-757A is shown in figure 18. The correlation coefficients derived from this comparison generally were high for the period analyzed; however, there were several periods (specifically during water years 1976, 1980, 1984, 1987, and 1997) where correlation of the water-level data was unusually low. Water-level elevations from wells G-757A and G-1362 during water years 1989 and 1997 are shown in figure 19. The correlation coefficients derived for comparison of the 1989 water year water-level data were 0.96 and 0.99 respectively, derived during the dry and wet seasons (fig. 18). By comparison, 1997 water year water-level data had correlation coefficients of 0.83 and 0.97, respectively, during the dry and wet seasons (fig. 18).

Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water level data from well G-1362 and that of well G-757A during water years 1974-2000. Figure 18. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water level data from well G-1362 and that of well G-757A during water years 1974-2000. Link to larger version

Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-757A and G-1362 during the 1989 and 1997 water years. Figure 19. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-757A and G-1362 during the 1989 and 1997 water years. Link to larger version

The water-level data from wells G-757A and G-1362 seem to be very similar (fig. 19) for water years 1989 and 1997. Some of the water-level changes in well G-1362, however, were not apparent in well G-757A during the 1997 dry season (particularly in November).

Wells G-864 and G-864A, which are only about 0.4 mi apart and at about the same depth (20 ft), are located about 0.4 and 0.2 mi, respectively, from the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority Well Field (figs. 1 and 2). The temporal variation of seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-864 and that of well G-864A is shown in figure 20. The correlation coefficients derived from the seasonal water-level data generally were high for the period analyzed. The lowest correlation coefficients were 0.94 during the dry season of water year 1989 and 0.92 during the wet season of water year 1990. Correlation coefficients were 0.99 during the dry season of water year 2000, and 1.0 during the wet season of water year 2000. Water-level elevations from wells G-864 and G-864A during water years 1990 and 2000 are shown in figure 21. The water-level data seem to be very similar in figure 21; however, peaks are often sharper in well G-864A than in well G-864. Because the water-level data are similar and that relation is maintained throughout the period analyzed, the final determination of redundancy rests on determining the degree of resolution of water-level data required in this particular area.

Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-864 and that of well G-864A during water years 1974-2000. Figure 20. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-864 and that of well G-864A during water years 1974-2000. Link to larger version

Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-864 and G-864A during the 1990 and 2000 water years. Figure 21. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-864 and G-864A during the 1990 and 2000 water years. Link to larger version

After seasons were censored to address missing record, wells F-45 and G-3564 in the C-6 and C-7 basins (fig. 1) could only be compared for four wet seasons and five dry seasons (table 4). As such, it may not be reasonable to conclude that either of these wells is redundant based on the limited amount of data available.

Next:


Figures: Click on a caption to view the figure.
Figure 1. Map showing location of continuous ground-water level monitoring network wells in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Figure 2. Map showing water-supply and water-management systems in Miami-Dade County.

Figure 3. Maps showing lines of equal rainfall in Miami-Dade County during (a) Hurricane Irene on October 14-16, 1999, and an (b) unnamed storm on October 2-3, 2000.

Figure 4. Graphs showing seasonal variation in mean water levels and variation in monthly standard deviation of mean water levels for wells G-620, G-864, G-1183, and S-18.

Figure 5. Hydrograph showing variation in water levels at wells G-3 and G-1368A along with estimated average daily pumpage based on annual pumpage totals during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 6. Hydrograph showing variation in water level at well G-1502 during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 7. Map showing grouping of wells based on average correlation of water-level data during the wet season.

Figure 8. Map showing grouping of wells based on average correlation of water-level data during the dry season.

Figure 9. Map showing grouping of wells based on average correlation of water-level data during both the wet and dry seasons.

Figure 10. Map showing grouping of wells near the West Well Field based on average correlation of water-level data during both wet and dry seasons.

Figure 11. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-1487 and that of well G-855 during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 12. Hydrographs showing water-level elevations from wells G-855 and G-1487 during the 1986 and 1998 water years.

Figure 13. Map showing grouping of wells near the Hialeah-Miami Springs Well Field based on average correlation of water-level data during both the wet and dry seasons.

Figure 14. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-3466 and that of wells G-3465, S-19, and S-68 during water years 1988-2000.

Figure 15. Hydrographs showing water-level elevations from wells G-3465, G-3466, S-19, and S-68 during the 1990 and 1996 water years.

Figure 16. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-3465, G-3466, S-19, and S-68 during water years 1988-99.

Figure 17. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between censored and uncensored water-level data from well G-3466 and that of wells G-3465, S-19, and S-68 during water years 1988-2000.

Figure 18. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water level data from well G-1362 and that of well G-757A during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 19. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-757A and G-1362 during the 1989 and 1997 water years.

Figure 20. Graph showing temporal variation in seasonal correlation between water-level data from well G-864 and that of well G-864A during water years 1974-2000.

Figure 21. Hydrograph showing water-level elevations from wells G-864 and G-864A during the 1990 and 2000 water years.


FirstGov.gov U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Water Resources Discipline, Florida

email Feedback | USGS privacy statement | Accessibility